Over the few past decades, value gap among generations has presented new challenges for organizations. Although studies have suggested value congruence as a mechanism to bring generations closer together, this study presents evidence showing that providing an autonomy-supportive environment, where higher levels of psychological need satisfaction for autonomy, competence, and relatedness are experienced by employees, facilitates the process of internalization and embrace of others' values. Such a context would result in better communication, mutual understanding, and bridging the generation gap effectively at workplace.
Afshari, L., & Gibson, P. (2015). Development of organizational commitment and value internalization. World, 6(2).
Alizadeh, E.(2012). Factors affecting intention to leave. Human Development bimonthly, 11, 16-26
Amoura, C., Berjot, S., Gillet, N., Caruana, S., & Finez, L. (2015). Effects of autonomy-supportive and controlling styles on situational self-determined motivation: Some unexpected results of the commitment procedure.Psychological reports, 116(1), 33-59.
Chatman, J. A. (1989, August). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1989, No. 1, pp. 199-203). Academy of Management
Chen, P. J., & Choi, Y. (2008). Generational differences in work values: a study of hospitality management. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20(6), 595-615.
Davis, Elissa. "Work Value Priority of Millennial Students." (2016).
Deal, J. J. (2007). Retiring the generation gap: How employees young and old can find common ground (Vol. 35). John Wiley & Sons.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of research in personality, 19(2), 109-134.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University Rochester Press. Pages 123-132
Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of personality, 62(1), 119-142.
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self?determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
Gillet, N., Forest, J., Benabou, C., & Bentein, K. (2015). The effects of organizational factors, psychological need satisfaction and thwarting, and affective commitment on workers’ well-being and turnover intentions. Le travail humain, 78(2), 119-140.
Gonzalez, J. A. (2016). Demographic dissimilarity, value congruence, and workplace attachment: asymmetrical group effects. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(1), 169-185.
Güntert, S. T. (2015). The impact of work design, autonomy support, and strategy on employee outcomes: A differentiated perspective on self-determination at work. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 74-87.
Hart, K. A. (2006). Generations in the workplace: finding common ground.MLO: medical laboratory observer, 38(10), 26-27.
Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 389-399.
Jones, J. (2013). The relation of individual-organizational perceived value congruence and service quality in predicting turnover intentions among hospital workers (Doctoral dissertation, CAPELLA UNIVERSITY).
Jurkiewicz, C. L., & Brown, R. G. (1998). Generational comparisons of public employee motivation. Review of public personnel administration, 18(4), 18-37.
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individual fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigeneration employees: strategies for effective management. The health care manager, 19(1), 65-hyhen.
Puig-Ribera, A., Martínez-Lemos, I., Giné-Garriga, M., González-Suárez, Á. M., Bort-Roig, J., Fortuño, J., ... & Gilson, N. D. (2015). Self-reported sitting time and physical activity: interactive associations with mental well-being and productivity in office employees. BMC public health, 15(1), 1.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Sharma, P., Kong, T. T. C., & Kingshott, R. P. (2016). Internal service quality as a driver of employee satisfaction, commitment and performance–exploring the focal role of employee well-being. Journal of Service Management, 27(5).
Shaw, S., & Fairhurst, D. (2008). Engaging a new generation of graduates.Education+ Training, 50(5), 366-378.
Siu, O. L., Cheung, F., & Lui, S. (2015). Linking positive emotions to work well-being and turnover intention among Hong Kong police officers: The role of psychological capital. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(2), 367-380.
Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (2009). The fourth turning. Three Rivers Press.
Wang, J. C. K., Ng, B. L., Liu, W. C., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Can being autonomy-supportive in teaching improve students’ self-regulation and performance?. In Building Autonomous Learners (pp. 227-243). Springer Singapore.
Weston, M. (2006). Integrating generational perspectives in nursing. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 11(2).
Wong, M., Gardiner, E., Lang, W., & Coulon, L. (2008). Generational differences in personality and motivation: do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace?. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 878-890.
Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (2000). Generations at work: Managing the clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in your workplace (p. 280). New York, NY: Amacom.
Sahraee, R., & Abdullah, H. B. (2017). Managing the Value Gap among Generations in Organizations: Socio-Psychological Approach. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(8), 624-628.
Copyright: © 2017 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode