International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Does Cause-proximity Matters in Cause-related Marketing?

Open access
Over the past 30 years cause-related marketing (CRM) campaigns have taking ground. In the business environment of today, a multitude of companies have aligned themselves with plethora of worthy causes. CRM benefits both the sponsoring company and the cause supported. Companies benefit as CRM is normally linked to a purchase of the sponsoring company’s product and thus brings profit to the companies. Meanwhile, causes benefits from the increasing awareness and funds for the causes through CRM campaigns conducted. Cause-related campaigns support causes at both local and international levels. Hence, examining whether cause-proximity may influence consumers’ response to CRM is crucial. Furthermore, there have been very few studies that focused on this matter. Hence, the current study is carried out to: (1) highlights CRM and CRM’s campaigns in Malaysia and (2) examine the impact of cause-proximity on consumers’ response to CRM in Malaysia. This study employed an experimental method; a 1X2 between subjects factorial design. The results showed that cause-proximity has significant impact on CRM evaluation. More specifically, the findings revealed that CRM campaign links to a local cause produces more favorable response among the Malaysian consumers as compared with CRM links with an international cause.
Adkins, S. (1999). Cause related marketing: Who cares wins. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

Barnes, N.G., (1992), Determinants of consumer participation in cause-related marketing
campaigns, American Business Review, June, 21-24.

Bar-Tal, D., (1976), Prosocial behavior: theory and research, New York: Halstead Press.

Brink, D. V. D., Schroder, G. O. and Pauwels, P. (2006), The effect of strategic and
tactical cause-related marketing on consumer’s brand loyalty, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 23 No.1, p. 15-25.

Brown, T. J. and Dacin, P. A. (1997), the company and the product: corporate
associations and consumer product responses, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61 No. 1, p. 68-84.

Chaney, I. and Dolli, N. (2000), Cause related marketing in New Zealand, International
Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, Vol. 6 No. 2, 156-163.

Cui, Y., Trent, E.S., Sullivan, P.M., and Matiru, G.N. (2003), Cause-related marketing:
how generation Y responds, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 31 No. 6, p.310-320.

Cone Roper Survey (2000). Retrieved October 02, 2007, from http://www.coneinc.com

Ellen, P.S., Mohr, L.A. and Webb, D.J. (2000), Charitable programs and the retailer: do
they mix?, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 76 No. 3, p. 393-406.

IEGSR. (2017). Sponsorship Spending Forecast: Continued Growth Around the World. IEG Sponsorship Report. Retrieved August 02, 2017, from https://www.sponsorship.com
Grau, S.L. and Folse, J.A.G. (2007), Cause-related marketing (CRM), the influence of donation
proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer, Journal of Advertising,
Vol. 36, No. 4, (Winter), p. 19-33.

Hajjat, M. M., (2003), Effect of cause-related marketing on attitudes and purchase
intentions: the moderating role of cause involvement and donation size, Journal of
Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, Vol. 11 No. 1, 93-109.

Mohamed Anuar, M. (2011). Impact of Structural Elements on Cause-related Marketing. Unpublished Thesis: Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Mohamed Anuar, M., & Mohamad, O. (2011). Examining the effects of cause-proximity and genderon consumers' response to Cause-related Marketing: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 174-181.
Mohamed Anuar, M. & Mohamad, O. (2016), Corporate Social Responsibility: Cause-related Marketing, Consumption in Malaysia: Meeting of New Changes, USM Publisher. 159-173.

Porter, M.E., and Kramer, M.R., (2002), The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy,
Harvard Business Review, 84 (December), p. 57-68.

Pracejus, J.W. and Olsen, G.D., (2004), The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of
cause-related marketing campaigns, Journal of Business Research, 57, p. 635-640.

Ross, J.K. III, Stutts, M.A. and Patterson, L.T. (1991), Tactical considerations for
the effective use of cause-related marketing, Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 7 No. 2, p. 58-65.

Ross, J.K. III, Patterson, L.T. and Stutts, M.A., (1992), Consumer perceptions of
organizations that use cause-related marketing, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 20 No. 1, 93-97.

Smith, C. (1994), The new corporate philanthropy, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72
No. 3, p. 105-16.

Unilever. (2017, January 05). Unilever. Retrieved August 02, 2017, from Unilever: https://www.unilever.com

Varadarajan, P.R. and Menon, A. (1988), Cause-related marketing: a coalignment of
marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52 No. 3, p. 58-74.

Watson T. (2006), Consumer philanthropy: nonprofits spend billions to reach consumers.
Huffington Post; Available at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tom-watson/consumer-philanthropy-no_b_36261.html.
Anuar, M. M., & Adam, F. (2017). Does Cause-proximity Matters in Cause-related Marketing? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(7), 718-727.