Random walk hypothesis is one of the models designed to empirically test the stock price behavior. Rejection of Random walk hypothesis (RWH hereafter) implies that stock prices or stock returns can be predicted by using their own previous values. The objective of this study is to test the RWH in Pakistani equity market which is an important emerging market and moreover, characterized by high turnover and high price volatility. This study incorporates the monthly data of 83 individual stocks categorized in 26 sector, covering the period from February 2009 to December 2015. In order to check the random walk hypothesis Augmented Dickey Fuller test, the Phillip-Perron Test and The Runs test are applied. Findings suggest that the KSE-100 stock returns are predictable on the basis of past information and the investors can earn the abnormal profit by following the systematic pattern. In other words, Pakistani stock market does not reflect the weak form efficiency.
Araújo Lima, E. J., & Tabak, B. M. (2004). Tests of the random walk hypothesis for equity markets: evidence from China, Hong Kong and Singapore. Applied Economics Letters, 11(4), 255-258.
Asif, M., Khwaja, H., & Wali, S. (2015). Testing the weak form efficiency of KSE 100 Index. City University Research Journal, 05(02), 291-300.
Chakraborty, M. (2006). Market efficiency for the Pakistan stock market: evidence from the Karachi Stock Exchange. South Asia Economic Journal, 7(1), 67-81.
Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American statistical association, 74(366a), 427-431.
Dryden, M. M. (1970). A statistical study of UK share prices. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 17(3), 369-389.
Errunza, V. R., & Losq, E. (1985). The behavior of stock prices on LDC markets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 9(4), 561-575.
Evans, T. (2006). Efficiency tests of the UK financial futures markets and the impact of electronic trading systems. Applied Financial Economics, 16(17), 1273-1283.
Fama, E. F. (1965). The behavior of stock-market prices. The Journal of Business, 38(1), 34-105.
Gozbasi, O., Kucukkaplan, I., & Nazlioglu, S. (2014). Re-examining the Turkish stock market efficiency: Evidence from nonlinear unit root tests. Economic Modelling, 38, 381-384.
Granger, C. W., & Morgenstern, O. (1963). Spectral analysis of New York stock market prices. Kyklos, 16(1), 1-27.
Groenewold, N. (1997). Share market efficiency: tests using daily data for Australia and New Zealand. Applied Financial Economics, 7(6), 645-657.
Grossman, S. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. The American Economic Review, 70(3), 393-408.
Haque, A., Liu, H. C., & Nisa, F. U. (2011). Testing the Week Form Efficiency of Pakistani Stock Market (2000-2010). International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 1(4), 153.
Hawawini, G., & Michel, P. (1984). European Equity Markets: A Review of the Evidence on Price Behavior and Efficiency in European Equity Markets: Risk, Return and Efficiency: Garland Publishing Company, New York and London.
Hudson, R., Dempsey, M., & Keasey, K. (1996). A note on the weak form efficiency of capital markets: The application of simple technical trading rules to UK stock prices-1935 to 1994. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(6), 1121-1132.
Husain, F. (1997). The random walk model in the Pakistani equity market: An examination. The Pakistan Development Review, 221-240.
Jun, K., & Uppal, J. (1994). Portfolio flows to Pakistan: Trends and policies. Paper presented at the A paper presented at the private sector development conference, LUMS.
Kendall, M. G., & Hill, A. B. (1953). The analysis of economic time-series-part i: Prices. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 116(1), 11-34.
Khilji, N. M., & Nabi, I. (1993). The Behaviour of Stock Returns in an Emerging Market: A Case Study of Pakistan [with Comments]. The Pakistan Development Review, 32(4), 593-604.
Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1988). Stock market prices do not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test. Review of financial studies, 1(1), 41-66.
Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1989). The size and power of the variance ratio test in finite samples: A Monte Carlo investigation. Journal of econometrics, 40(2), 203-238.
Mandelbrot, B. (1963). New methods in statistical economics. Journal of political Economy, 71(5), 421-440.
Mehmood, M. S., Mehmood, A., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2012). Stock Market Prices Follow the Random Walks: Evidence from the Efficiency of Karachi Stock Exchange. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 51(1).
Mobarek, A., & Fiorante, A. (2014). The prospects of BRIC countries: Testing weak-form market efficiency. Research in international Business and Finance, 30, 217-232.
Ngene, G., Tah, K. A., & Darrat, A. F. (2017). The random-walk hypothesis revisited: new evidence on multiple structural breaks in emerging markets. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, 10(1), 88-106.
Omar, M., Hussain, H., Bhatti, G. A., & Altaf, M. (2013). Testing of random walks in Karachi stock exchange. Elixir Financial Management, 54, 12293-12299.
Phillips, P. C., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 335-346.
Rahman, M. S., Simon, H., & Hossain, M. M. (2016). An Empirical Analysis of Weak Form Market Efficiency: Evidence from Chittagong Stock Exchange (CSE) of Bangladesh.
Said, A., & Harper, A. (2015). The Efficiency of the Russian Stock Market: A Revisit of the Random Walk Hypothesis. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 19(1), 42.
Solnik, B. H. (1973). Note on the validity of the random walk for European stock prices. The journal of finance, 28(5), 1151-1159.
Sung, M., & Johnson, J. (2006). A new perspective on weak form efficiency: Empirical evidence from the UK bookmaker based betting market.
Tiwari, A. K., & Kyophilavong, P. (2014). New evidence from the random walk hypothesis for BRICS stock indices: a wavelet unit root test approach. Economic Modelling, 43, 38-41.
Habibah, U., Ghumro, N. H., & Mirani, M. A. (2017). Testing the Random Walk Hypothesis: A Case of Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(7), 503-517.
Copyright: © 2017 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
