The purpose of this paper is to obtain expert consensus on the writing of relevant items which allied their competency indicators of integrated science process skills. There are five constructs of integrated science process skills, namely formulating hypotheses, defining operationally, identifying and controlling variables, interpreting data, and experimenting. Verification is done by 13 experts in the field of science education using structured questionnaire aiming to validate the items-indicators to gain response about form one student’s ability on integrated science process skills. Questionnaire containing 26 items of 5-point Likert scale was given to experts. Consensus from the experts was further analysed using Fuzzy Delphi method. The study found that expert consensus on the items-indicators of integrated science process skills were more than 75% with the threshold value (d) ? 0.2 and ?-cut value ? 0.5.
Abu Hassan K., & Rohana H. (2003). Tahap Penguasaan Kemahiran Proses Sains dan Hubungannya dengan Pencapaian Kimia di kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Daerah Johor Bahru. Retrieved from http://eprints.utm.my/2345/
Adler, M. & Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the oracle: the Delphi method and its
application to social policy and public health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Burns, J. C., Okey, J. R. & Wise, K. C. (1985). Development of an Integrated Process Skill Test: TIPS II. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(2), 169-177.
Beaumont-Walters, Y., & Soyibo, K. (2001). An Analysis of High School Students’ Performance on Five Integrated Science Process Skills. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(2). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 02635140120087687.
Chang, P.-L., Hsu, C.-W., & Chang, P.-C. (2011). Fuzzy Delphi Method for Evaluating Hydrogen Production Technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(21), 14172–14179. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.045
Cheng C. H., & Lin Y. (2002). Evaluating the Best Main Battle Tank using Fuzzy Decision Theory with Linguistic Criteria Evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142, 174-186.
Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2006). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools: Developing fundamental knowledge and skills. San Francisco: Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.
Chu, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2008). A Delphi-Based Approach to Developing Expert Systems with the Cooperation of Multiple Experts. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 2826–2840. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.034
Curriculum Development Centre. (2013). Dokumen standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran sains tahun empat. Putrajaya: MOE.
Dillashaw, F. G., & Okey, J. R. (1980). Test of Integrated Science Process Skills for Secondary Students. Science Education. 64, 601-608.
Edy Hafizan M. S., & Lilia H. (2010). Development and Validation of a Test of Integrated Science Process Skills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 142-146. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.127
Harlen, W., & Elstgeest, J. (1992). UNESCO sourcebook for science in the primary school: A workshop approach to teacher education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org
Harlen, W. (2006). Teaching, learning and assessing science 5-12. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Jones, H., & Twiss B. L. (1978). Forecasting technology for planning decisions. New York: Macmillan.
Kazeni, M. M. M. (2005). Development and validation of a test of integrated science process skills for the further education and training learners. Master dissertation, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Krosnick, J. A., & Presser, S. (2009). Question and questionnaire design. Handbook of Survey Research, 2(3), 263-314.
Ludeman, R. R. (1975). Development of the science processes test. Paper work presented at Annual Meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Mac, Los Angeles.
Mat Rasit I. (2014). Kajian Keberkesanan Program Pentaksiran Kerja Amali Sains (PEKA): Satu Penilaian di Sekolah Rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 39(2), 83-93.
Nazirah M. A., Abdullah Hisam O., Shuib R., Rodzah Y., Siti Zainon M., Tuan Mohammad T. Y., Wan Muhammad Aizat W. A., Mohd Farid Al Azmi I., & Mohd Naszrie R. (2015). Fuzzy Delphi for marine space stakeholder framework development: An analytical literature review. Paper work presented at The World Cadastre Summit, Congress & Exhibition, 20 –25 April, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ong, E. T., Wong, Y. T., Sopia M. Y., Sadiah B., Asmayati Y., & Zahid M. S. (2012). Malaysian Based Science Process Skills Inventory: Development, Validation and Utilisation. CREAM – Current Research in Malaysia. 1(1), 125-149.
Ong, E. T., & Mohd. Al-Junaidi M. (2013). Pembinaan dan Penentusahan Instrumen Kemahiran Proses Sains untuk Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Teknologi (Social Sciences). 66(1), 7–20.
Ong, E. T., Norjuhana M., Siti Eshah M., Sabri M. S., Nik Azmah N. Y., & Koon, P. Y. (2015). Basic Science Process Skills Test for Primary Schools: Item Development and Validation. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia. 5(1).
Oppenheim, A. N. (2009). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. New edition. London: Continuum.
Padilla, M. J. (1990). The Science Process Skills. Research Matters - to the Science Teacher, 9004. Retrieved from https://www.narst.org/publications/research/skill.cfm
Rezba, R.J., Sprague, C., Fiel, R.L., & Funk, H.J. (1995). Learning and assessing science process skills. 3rd ed. Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.
Shanteau, J., Weiss, D. J., Thomas, R. P., & Pounds, J. C. (2002). Performance-based assessment of expertise: How to decide if someone is an expert or not. European Journal of Operational Research, 136, 253-263.
Schuman, H. (1972). Two Sources of Anti-War Sentiment in America. American Journal
of Sociology, 78, 513-536. Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/ 2027.42/ 91773
Sheeba, M. N. (2013). An Anatomy of Science Process Skills in The Light of the Challenges to Realize Science Instruction Leading to Global Excellence in Education. Educationia Confab, 4(2), 108-123. Retrieved from http://wwwconfabjournals.com/confab journals/ images/6520138281213.pdf
Smith, K. A., & Welliver, P. W. (1990). The Development of a Science Process Assessment for Fouth-Grade Students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 27(8), 727-738.
Tang, C.W., & Wu, C.T. (2010). Obtaining a Picture of Undergraduate Education Quality: A Voice From Inside the University. Higher Education (60), 269-286.
Temiz, B. K., Tasar, M. F., & Tan, M. (2006). Development and Validation of a Multiple Format Test of Science Process Skills. International Education Journal, 7(7), 1007-1027.
Yeoh P. C., & Gan C. M. (2004). Emphases of Malaysian primary science curriculum. In. Yap K. C., Goh N. K., Toh K. A., & Bak H. K. Teaching primary science, Jurong: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Karim, E., Ahmad, J., & Osman, K. (2017). Fuzzy Delphi Method for Content Validation of Integrated Science Process Skills Instrument. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 707-718.
Copyright: © 2017 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
