This study was done in two State-owned enterprise banking which are Bank Rakyat Indonesia and Bank Negara Indonesia. The aim of this study is to know the underlying reason of the companies do the activity of CSR for education and their startegies in implementing the CSR program for education. This study used qualitative research method with descriptive approach with multy sites study type. The result of this study showed that both companieshave less striking similarities and differences, since both banks are state-owned banks which have been recognized by the people in terms of Corporate Social Responsibility for education. The underlying reason for the company to do CSR activities is because of government regulations about the obligation of SOEs (BUMN) to implement CSR. The strategies of the two companies do not have a significant difference. Since the researcher conducted the research in the branch office that hascentral office, then all activities undertaken must get approval from the regional and central office by sending a letter of recommendation. As seen in the objectives of the Corporate Social Responsibility program undertaken by the company, there are things that cannot be separated with corporate objectives. The development of CSR for education is very useful for companies and corporate partners for the implementation of social activities and the achievement of corporate goals. As performed by BRI and BNI in carrying out CSR activities, BRI has included it in the Vision of the company, while BNI has included it on the Mission of the company so that the implementation of CSR is in line with corporate goals.
Adebayo, E. (2000), “Corporate social responsibility disclosure, corporate financial and social performance: an empirical analysis”, dissertation, Wayne Huizenga Graduate School of Business and Enterpreneurship, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL.
Asongu, J.J., 2007, ‘The Legitimacy of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility as a marketing Tool’,Journal of Business and Public Policy, Vol. 1 No. 1.
Anggraini, Fr. 2006.Pengungkapan informasi sosial dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pengungkapan informasi sosial dalam laporan keuangan tahunan: Studi empiris pada perusahaan-perusahaan yang terdaftar bursa efek Jakarta. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 9.
Cordeiro, J.J., Sarkis, J., 1997. Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earning forecast. Business Strategy and the Environment 6 (2), 104–114.
Dobrea, R.C., Dinu, F.A (2011), Social Responsibility: Support for the economic Performance of Romanian SMEs, Proceeding of the 12th Management International Conference, Portonoz, Slovenia, 23-26 November.
David, Fred R., 2007, ‘Strategic Management : Concepts and Cases’, Eleventh Edition, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Epstein, M.J., Flamholtz, E. and McDonough, J.J. (1976). Corporate Social Accounting in the United States of America: state ofe the art and future prospects”. Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 1, pp. 23-42
George, G (2016), Corporate Social Responsibility: An Overview and New Research Directions, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 59, No. 2, pp. 534-544.
Kotler, Philip and Lee, Nancy., 2005, “Corporate Social Responsibility : Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause” , New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Lee, S., Park, S., 2009. Do socially responsible activities help hotel and casino achieve their financial goals? International Journal of Hospitality Management 28 (1), 105–112.
Linda and Jenny Fairbrass, 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Models and Theories in Stakeholder Dialogue’, CRRC, Queen’s University Belfast.
Martijn, C., Spears, R., Van Der Pligt, J., Jakobs, E., 1992. Negativity and positivity effects in person perception and inference: Ability versus morality. European Journal of Social Psychology 22 (5), 453–463.
Mitchell, R. K., 1997, ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp.853-886.
Miles,M.B., Huberman, A.M., & Saldana,j. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: A Metods Sourcebook (3nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
PERATURAN MENTERI BUMN NO. PER-09/MBU/07/2015tentang program kemitraan dan program bina lingkungan badan usaha milik Negara
Peter, Brabeck Letmathe., 2009. The Nestle Concepts of Corporate Social Responsibility: as implemented in Latin America
Rangan, K., Chase, L.A., Karim, S (2012), Why every company needs a CSR Strategy and How to build it. Working paper 12-088. Harvard Business School. Social Responsibility: an integrative framework grounded in theory and practice”.
Rodriguez, F.J.G., Cruz, Y.D.M.A., 2007. Relation between social-environmental responsibility and performance in hotel firms. International Journal of Hospitality Management 26 (4), 824–839.
Suharto, Edi .2008., “Corporate Social Responsibility: What is and Benefit for Corporate” makalah yang disajikan pada Seminar Dua Hari, Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategy, Management and Leadership, Intipesan, Hotel Aryaduta Jakarta 13-14 Februari
Smith, T. & Crane, E. (1992) The Impact on Corporations of Shareholder Actions (The Social Investment Almanac, Henry Holt).
Sparkes, R. (2002) Socially Responsible Investment: A Global Revolution (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons).
Soetjipto,B.E et al .2016. Corporate Social Responsibility: The alternative Financing To Regional Development
Taylor, S.E., Koivumaki, J.H., 1976. The perception of self and others: acquaintanceship, affect, and actor-observer differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 33 (4), 403–408
Vance, S.C., 1975. Are socially responsible corporations good investment risks? Management Review 64 (8), 18–24.
Wright, P., Ferris, S.P., 1997. Agency conflict and corporate strategy: the effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic Management Journal 18 (1), 77–83.
Wojciszke, B., Brycz, H., Borkenau, P., 1993. Effects of information content and evaluative extremity on positivity and negativity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64 (3), 327–335.
Sejati, D. S., Soetjipto, B. E., & Rahayu, W. P. (2017). Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility Program for Education in Government Banking of Malang. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 35-46.
Copyright: © 2017 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
