International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Urban Youth Subjective Well-Being in Malaysia: Potential Factors

Open access

Siti Aisyah Ramli, Bahaman Abu Samah, Asnarulkhadi Abu Samah, Hayrol Azril Mohammed Shaffril

Pages 477-482 Received: 24 Feb, 2017 Revised: 06 Mar, 2017 Published Online: 17 Apr, 2017

http://dx.doi.org/10.46886/IJARBSS/v7-i4/2827
This conceptual paper aims to identify the potential factors for subjective well-being among urban youth in Malaysia. To understand urban youth’s subjective well-being is important as it offers a comprehensive view on the issue. Based on a review of literature and document analyses, it concludes that subjective well-being is not merely covering the tangible aspects such as physical infrastructure and the economy, but also the non-tangible aspects such as emotional, social, political, spiritual, psychological, happiness and others.
1. Alatartseva, E., & Barysheva, G. (2015). Well-being: subjective and objective aspects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 36-42.
2. Deutsche Bank (2006). Measures of Well-being. Available at: http://www.dbresearch.com/PROD/DBR_INTERNET_EN-PROD/PROD0000000000202587.PDF
3. Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian journal of clinical psychology, 24, 25-41.
4. Durayappah, A. (2011). The 3P model: A general theory of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(4), 681-716.
5. Economic Planning Unit (2013). The Malaysian Economy in Figures 2013. Economic Planning Unit.
6. Economic Planning Unit (2013). Malaysian Well-being Report 2013. Economic Planning Unit. Available at: http://www.epu.gov.my/sites/default/files/Pembentangan%20MWI%202013_2Disember%202013.pdf
7. Economic Planning Unit (2013). Laporan Kesejahteraan Rakyat Malaysia 2013. Available at: http://www.epu.gov.my/sites/default/files/3Laporan.pdf
8. Galinha, I. C., & Pais-Ribeiro, J. L. (2012). Cognitive, affective and contextual predictors of subjective well-being. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(1).
9. Institute for Youth Research Malaysia. (2010). Pemetaan Belia dan Indeks Belia Malaysia: Ke arah Perancangan Strategik Pembangunan Belia. Available at: http://mpbn.kbs.gov.my/maklumat.pdf/MPBN-PETA%20BELIA%20(m.s%2076%20-%2095).pdf
10. Institute for Youth Research Malaysia. Malaysian Youth Index (2015). Available at: http://www.iyres.gov.my/images/indeksbeliamalaysia2015/IBM2015full.pdf
11. Ivkovi?, A. F., Ham, M., & Mijo?, J. (2014). Measuring objective well-being and sustainable development management. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 4(2), 1-29.
12. Legatum Institute (2013). Legatum Properity Index. Available at: http://www.prosperity.com/#!/
13. Malaysian Youth policy. Executive Summary Malaysian Youth Policy. Available at: http://www.youthpolicy.org/library/wp-content/uploads/library/2002_Youth_Malaysia_Review_Policies_Programmes_Eng.pdf
14. McGillivray, M., & Clarke, M. (Eds.). (2006). Understanding human well-being. Tokyo:: United Nations University Press.
15. Ministry of Rural and Regional Development. Basic Malaysian Data. Available at: http://www.rurallink.gov.my/en/citizen/desa-information/statistic/
16. OECD (2013). Measuring the Sustainability of Well-being over Time in How’s life? 2013 Measuring Well-being, OECD Publishing.
17. Omar, N., & Abu Bakar, S.H. (2017). Poor Children in Malaysia: Their Index of Objective Wellbeing. Southeast Asia: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 8–21.
18. Ravens-Sieberer, U., Devine, J., Bevans, K., Riley, A. W., Moon, J., Salsman, J. M., & Forrest, C. B. (2014). Subjective well-being measures for children were developed within the PROMIS project: presentation of first results. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 67(2), 207-218.
19. Sulaiman, Y., Ortega, A., D’Silva, J. L., Samah, A. A., & Omar, S. Z. (2015). A Comparison across Ranks of Well-being among Police Officers in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 12(1), 151.
Ramli, S. A., Samah, B. A., Samah, A. A., & Shaffril, H. A. M. (2017). Urban Youth Subjective Well-Being in Malaysia: Potential Factors. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(4), 477-482.