The Kenya sugar industry operate at an average capacity utilization of 50-60% due to technical limitations which make them uncompetitive in the COMESA region putting at stake 25% of the population that depends on the industry. The objective of the study was to determine the influence of technology capability on competitive advantage of sugar companies in Western Kenya and the hypothesis was that there is no significant relationship between technology capability and competitive advantage in sugar companies in Western Kenya. Descriptive and correlational research design was used. The target population was 727 senior and middle level managers. A sample of 88 respondents was used in the study. Pilot testing of the questionnaire for validity and reliability was done using 10% of the 88 respondents giving 9 participants. Secondary data was obtained from KSB Year Book of Sugar Statistics and AFFA Year Book of Sugar Statistics reports. Out of 88 questionnaires sent out, 64 were received giving a response rate of 73%. Correlation (r=0.289, p=0.050, CL=95%) and hypothesis (X2 critical value 3.84< X2 test statistics 5.343) analyses established a positive relationship between technology capability and competitive advantage. The conclusion drawn from the study findings is that The companies under study have technology capability limitations. The study recommends that each firm pays more attention to proper technology capability management. Further research should be carried out on the factors influencing factory capacity utilization of the sugar industry in Kenya.
Afuah, A. (2002). Mapping technological capabilities into product markets and competitive advantage: the case of cholesterol drugs. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (2).
Amaeshi U. F., Okorocha K.A. and Akujor J. C. (2015). Effects of Production Facilities Maintenance on Competitive Advantage of Selected Firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Research in Management, Science & Technology 3(4).
Baark, E., Lau, A. K. W., Lo, W., & Sharif, N. (2011, April). Innovation sources, capabilities and competitiveness: Evidence from Hong Kong Firms. Paper presented at the Dynamics of Institutions & Markets in Europe (DIME) Final Conference, Maastrich.
Baker, T.L. (1994). Doing Social Research (2nd. edition New York: McGraw – Hill Inc.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99-120.
Barney, J. B. (2002). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage, (2nd ed.) Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Bulitia, G. M., Obonyo, P. K., & Ojera, P. B. (2014). Moderating effect of technology innovation on the human resource management practices and firm performance: A study of manufacturing firms in Kenya. Research Journal of Human Resource, 2 (3), 1 – 21.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition).New Jersey State: Lawrence Erlbaum.
FAO Statistics Division (FAOSTAT). Retrieved from http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx
Hermelo, F. D., & Vassolo, R. (2007). The determinants of firm’s growth: An empirical examination. Revista Abante, 10 (1), 3-20.
Kaumbutho, P. G., Awiti, L. M., & Some, D. K. A. (1991). Analysis of sugarcane and
sugar production costs for the Kenyan Sugar Industry. Kenya Sugar Authority.
Kenya Sugar Board Year Book of Sugar Statistics (2010).
Kenya Sugar Board Year Book of Sugar Statistics (2013).
Kenya Sugar Industry (2009).
Khalaji, A. (2014). The analysis of technological capabilities in sugarcane industries: Case study of Salman Farsi Cultivation and Industry Company. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4, 965 - 972.
Kotha, S., & Swamidass, P. M. (1998). Explaining manufacturing technology use, firm size and performance using a multidimensional view of technology. Journal of Operations Management, 17(1), 23–37.
Kumar, S., & Arora, N. (2009). Analyzing regional variations in capacity utilization of Indian Sugar Industry using non-parametric frontier technique. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 2 (4), 1-26.
Lall, S. (2001). Competitiveness, technology and skills. UK: Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Maletic, D., Maletic, M., Al-Najjar, B. & Gomiscek, B. (2014). The role of maintenance in improving company's competitiveness and profitability: a case study in a textile company. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 25 (4), pp. 441-456.
Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research methods. Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nairobi, Kenya: African Centre for Technology Studies (ACTS).
Mwanaongoro, S., & Imbambi, R. M. (2014). Assessment of relationship between plant and equipment maintenance strategies and factory performance of the Kenya Sugar Firms. Asian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 1 (2), 18 – 28.
Obonyo, W. O. (2004).The influence of sugarcane financing on production: A case of South Nyanza Sugar Company Limited (Unpublished master’s thesis). Egerton University, Kenya.
Odek, O., Kegode, P., & Ochola, S. (2003). The Challenges and way forward for the sugar sub-sector in Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya.
Oruwari, Y., Jev, M., & Owei, O. (2002). Acquisition of technological capability in Africa: A case study of indigenous building materials firms in Nigeria. ATPS Working Paper Series No. 33.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2), 171-80.
Wernerfelt, B. (1989). From critical resources to corporate strategy. Journal of General Management, 14 (3), 4-12.
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics, an introductory analysis. (2nd. ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
Zhou, K. Z., & Wu, F. (2010). Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 547 –560.
Imbambi, E. R. M., Oloko, M., & Rambo, C. M. (2017). Influence of Technology Capability on Competitive Advantage of Sugar Companies in Western Kenya. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 155-167.
Copyright: © 2017 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
