The influence of two primary consumption value (utilitarian and hedonic) factors was investigated on the college students’ intention to purchase athletic footwear. Three hundred twenty (N = 320) college students participated in the study. Three utilitarian value factors (comfort, durability, and price) and three hedonic value factors (style, color, and celebrity endorsement) have emerged through literature review and a factor analysis. The results indicated that utilitarian value factors play a more significant role than hedonic values when college students purchase athletic footwear. A series of ANOVA indicated that the influence of consumption value factors did not significantly differ on students’ demographic backgrounds of genders and races. Marketers and advertising managers of athletic footwear companies should utilize the findings of this study to communicate with college student consumers more effectively.
Apasu-Gbotsu, Y. (1982). The role of personal values in the explanation of salespersons' performance, satisfaction and propensity to quit (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Babin, B. J., Chebat, J. C., & Michon, R. (2004). Perceived appropriateness and its effect on quality, affect and behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11(5), 287-298.
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656.
Bahng, Y., Kincade, D., & Yang, J. (2013). U.S. college students' apparel shopping orientation and brand/product preferences within the context of college major. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 17(3), 367-384.
Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1990). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159-170.
Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behaviors: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1207–1220.
Bloch, P. H., & Bruce, G. D. (1984). The leisure experience and consumer products: an investigation of underlying satisfactions. Journal of Leisure Research, 16(1), 74-88.
Chang, E., Burns, L. D., & Francis, S. K. (2004). Gender differences in the dimensional structure of apparel shopping satisfaction among Korean consumers: The role of hedonic shopping value. International Textile and Apparel Association, 22, 185-199.
Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing,77, 511-535.
Chiu, H. C., Hsieh, Y. C., Li, Y. C., & Lee, M. (2005). Relationship marketing and consumer switching behavior. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1681-1689.
Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. (2007). Form versus function: How the intensities of specific emotions evoked in functional versus hedonic trade-offs mediate product preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), 702-714.
Clawson, C. J., & Vinson, D. (1978). Human Values: A Historical and Interdisciplinary Analysis. Advances in Consumer Research, 5, 396-402.
College Media Marketing Advertising, College Promotions, on Campus Promotion Ads, Placement Ads." Alloy Media Marketing, Reaching Today's Teens, College Students. N.p., n.d. Web. 4. Sept. 2016
Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76, 193-218.
Crowley, A. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Hughes, K. R. (1992). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attitudes toward product categories. Marketing Letters, 3(3), 239-249.
DeBard, R. D. (2004). Millennials coming to college. In R. D. DeBard & M. D. Coomes (Eds.), Serving the millennial generation: New directions for student services (pp. 33–45). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71.
Feather N. T. (1988). Values, valences, and course enrollment: Testing the role of personal values within an expectancy-valence framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 381-391.
Fischer, E., & Arnold, S. J. (1990). More than a labor of love: Gender roles and Christmas gift shopping. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 333-345.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Griffin, M., Babin, B., & Modianos, D. (2000). Shopping values of Russian consumers: The impact of habituation in a developing economy. Journal of Retailing, 76(1), 33-52.
Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33-44.
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101.
Honkanen, P., Verplanken, B., & Olsen, O. S. (2006). Ethical Values and Motives Driving Organic Food Choice. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 1(5), 420-430.
Kim, H. Y., & Chung, J. E. (2011). Consumer purchase intention for organic personal care products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1),40-47.
Kim, S. H. (2005). Consumer profiles of apparel product involvement and values. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 9(2), 207-220.
Kim, Y., & Choi, S. M. (2005). Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 592-599
Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I. (2002). Earning the right to indulge: Effort as a determinant of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(2), 155-170.
Morrison, D.A. (2004). Marketing to the campus crowd: Everything you need to know to capture the $200 billion college market. Chicago, IL: Dearborn Trade Publishing.
Nili, M., Delavari, D., Tavassoli, N., & Barati, R. (2013). Impacts of utilitarian and hedonistic Values of online shopping on preferences and intentions of consumers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(5), 82-85.
Noble, S. M., Haytko, D. L., & Phillips, J. (2009). What drives college-age Generation Y consumers. Journal of Business Research 62, 617–628.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
Okada, E. M. (2005). Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 43-53.
Overby, J. W., & Lee, E. J. (2006). The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 59, 1160-1166.
Pepper, M., Jackson, T., & Uzzell, D. (2009). An Examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviors. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 126-136.
Pinto, D. C., Nique, W. M., Añaña, E. D. S., & Herter, M. M. (2011). Green consumer values: How do personal values influence environmentally responsible water consumption? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(2), 122–131.
Refuel Agency (2015). What makes college consumers so valuable to marketers? Retrieved from http://www.refuelagency.com/expertise/college-marketing/
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2000). Consumer Behavior (7th ed.). Wisconsin: Prentice Hall.
Schwartz, S. H. (1997). Values and culture. In D. Munro, S. Carr, & J. Schumaker (Eds.), Motivation and culture (pp. 69-84). New York: Routledge.
Sherry, J. F., McGrath, M. A., & Levy, S. J. (1992). The disposition of the gift and many unhappy returns. Journal of Retailing, 68, 40–65.
Suar, D., & Khuntia, R. (2010). Influence of personal values and value congruence on unethical practice and work behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 443-460.
The 360 Youth College Explorer. (2009). College students tote $122 billion in spending power back to campus this year. Retrieved from http://www.harrisinteractive.com/NEWS
To, P. L., Liao, C. & Lin, T. H. (2007). Shopping motivations on Internet: A study based on utilitarian and hedonic value. Technovation, 27, 774–787.
Trail, G. T., & Chelladurai, P. (2002). Perceptions of intercollegiate athletic goals and processes: The influence of personal values. Journal of Sport Management, 16, 289-310.Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohman, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310-320.
Wong, N. & Smith, J. (2002). College students spend $200 billion per year. Retrieved from http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/allnewsbydate.asp?NewsID=480.
Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lee, S. (2000). An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2),195-211.
Yoh, T., Chen, H. (Yentin), & Jang, I. (2016). Utilitarian and Hedonic Consumption Values on American College Students’ Athletic Footwear Purchase Intention. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(12), 288-300.
Copyright: © 2016 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
