This paper investigates the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) for ISE30, ISE50, ISE100 and ISE Composite indices with unit root tests which were adapted for the non-linear ESTAR process. Firstly, Harvey et al. (2008) linearity test is employed. The test results indicate that all indices have non-linear behavior. Afterwards, non-linear unit root tests developed by Kapetanios et al. (2003) and Kruse (2011) were conducted. While the Kapetanios et al. (2003) test accepts the existence of EMH for all indices, the Kruse (2011) test which is relatively more recent rejects the hypothesis.
Abadir, K. M & Distaso, W. (2007): Testing joint hypotheses when one of the alternatives is one-sided. Journal of Econometrics, Vol 140(2), p. 695–718.
Aga, M. & Kocaman, B. (2011): Efficient Market Hypothesis and Emerging Capital Markets: Empirical Evidence from Istanbul Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Markets Research, Vol 3, p. 44-57.
Antoniou, A., Ergul, N. & Holmes, P. (1997): Market efficiency, thin trading and non-linear behaviour: evidence from an emerging market. European Financial Management, Vol 3(2), p. 175-190.
Balaban, E. (1995): Informational Efficiency of the Istanbul Securities Exchange and Some Rationale for Public Regulation. The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Discussion Paper No: 9502, p.1-27.
Balaban, E. & Kunter, K. (1999): A note on the efficiency of financial markets in a developing country. Applied Economics Letters, Vol 4(2), p. 109-112.
Borges, M. (2010): Efficient market hypothesis in European stock markets. The European Journal of Finance, Vol 16(7), p. 711-726.
Çelik, T. & Ta?, O. (2007): Etkin Piyasa Hipotezi ve Geli?mekte Olan Hisse Senedi Piyasalar?. ?TÜ Dergisi, Vol 4(2), p. 11-22.
Çevik, E. (2012): ?stanbul Menkul K?ymetler Borsas?'nda Etkin Piyasa Hipotezinin Uzun Haf?za Modelleri ile Analizi: Sektörel Bazda Bir ?nceleme. Journal of Ya?ar University, Vol 26(7), p. 4437-4454.
Çevik, E. & Erdo?an, S. (2009): Bankac?l?k Sektörü Hisse Senedi Piyasas?n?n Etkinli?i: Yap?sal K?r?lma ve Güçlü Haf?za. Do?u? Üniversitesi Dergisi, Vol 10(1), p. 26-40.
Duman Atan, S., Özdemir, Z. & Atan, M. (2009): Hisse Senedi Piyasas?nda Zay?f Formda Etkinlik: ?MKB Üzerine Ampirik Bir Ara?t?rma. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi ?ktisadi ve ?dari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol 24(2), p. 33-48.
Ergül, N. (2009): Ulusal Hisse Senetleri Piyasas?'nda Etkinlik. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Vol 7(1), p. 101-117.
Fama, E. (1965): The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices. The Journal of Business, Vol 38(1), p. 34-105.
Fama, E. (1970): Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Works. Journal of Finance, Vol 17(2), p. 383-417.
Finnet 2000 Plus I; Retrieved October 30, 2015, from http://www.finnet.com.tr/f2000plus
Gozbasi, O., Kucukkaplan, I. & Nazlioglu, S. (2014): Re-examining the Turkish stock market efficiency: Evidence from nonlinear unit root tests. Economic Modelling, Vol 38, p. 381-384.
Granger, C. & Morgenstern, O. (1962): Spectral Analysis of New York Stock Market Prices. Econometric Research Program Research Memorandum No. 45, 1-31.
Harvey, D. I., Leybourne, S. J. & Xiao, B. (2008): A powerful test for linearity when the order of integration is unknown. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, Vol 12(3).
Hoque, H., Kim, J. & Pyun, C. (2007): A compatison of variance ratio tests of random walk: A case of Asian emerging stock markets. International Review of Economics and Finance, Vol 16, p. 488-502.
Kan, D. & O'Callaghan, B. (2007): Examination of the efficient market hypothesis-the case of post-crisis Asia Pacific countries. Journal of Asian Economics, Vol 18, p. 294-313.
Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y. & Snell, A. (2003): Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics, Vol 112(2), p. 359–379.
Karacaer, S., Kapusuzo?lu, A. & Bozkurt, F. (2010): From the Anomalies of the Days of the Week Point of View Testing of the Validity of Efficient Market Hypothesis: Evidence from Istanbul Stock Exchange. Banking and Finance Letters, Vol 2(1), p. 215-221.
Kasman, A. & K?rkulak, B. (2007): Türk Hisse Senedi Piyasas? Etkin mi? Yap?sal K?r?lmal? Birim Kök Testlerinin Uygulanmas?. ?ktisat ??letme ve Finans, p. 68-78.
Kim, M., Nelson, C. & Startz , R. (1991): Mean Reversion in Stock Prices? A Reappraisal of the Empirical Evidence. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol 58(3), p. 515-528.
Kruse, R. (2011): A new unit root test against ESTAR based on a class of modified statistics. Statistical Papers, Vol 52(1), p. 71–85.
Lo, A. & MacKinlay, A. (1988): Stock Market Prices Do Not Follow Random Walks: Evidence from a Simple Specification Test. The Review of Financial Studies, Vol 1(1), p. 41-66.
Lo, A. & MacKinlay, A. (1989): The size and power of the variance ratio test in finite samples: A Monte Carlo investigation. Journal of Econometrics, Vol 40(2), p. 203-238.
Lumsdaine, R. & Papell, D. (1997): Multiple Trend Breaks and the Unit-Root Hypothesis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol 79(2), p. 212-218.
Luukkonen, R., Saikkonen, P. & Teräsvirta, T. (1988): Testing linearity against smooth transition autoregressive models. Biometrika, Vol 75(3), p. 491–499.
Michael, P., Nobay, A. R. & Peel, D. A. (1997): Transactions costs and nonlinear adjustment in real exchange rates; An empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy, Vol 105(4), p. 862–879.
Muradoglu, Y. & Metin, K. (1996): Efficiency of the Turkish Stock Exchange with respect to monetary variables: A cointegration analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 90, p. 566-576.
Müslümov, A., Aras, G. & Kurtulu?, B. (2003): Evolving Market Efficiency in Istanbul Stock Exchange. Istanbul Technical University Selected Articles, p. 1-19.
Narayan, P., Narayan, S., Popp, S. & Ahmed, H. (2015): Is the efficient market hypothesis day-of-the-week dependent? Evidence from the banking sector. Applied Economics, Vol 47(23), p. 2359-2378.
Özdemir, Z. (2008): Efficient market hypothesis: evidence from a small open-economy. Applied Economics, Vol 40(5), p. 633-641.
Rapach, D. E. & Wohar, M. E. (2006): The out-of-sample forecasting performance of nonlinear models of real exchange rate behavior. International Journal of Forecasting, Vol 22(2), p. 341–361.
Roberts, H. (1959): Stock market patterns and financial analysis: Methodoloigical suggestions. Journal of Finance, Vol 14(1), p. 1-10.
Sarantis, N. (1999): Modeling non-linearities in real effective exchange rates. Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol 18(1), p. 27–45.
Schwert, G. W. (2003): Anomalies and market efficiency. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1, p. 939-974.
Shiller, R. J. & Perron, P. (1985): Testing the random walk hypothesis: Power versus frequency of observation. Economics Letters, Vol 18(4), p. 381-386.
Smith, G. & Ryoo, H.-J. (2003): Variance ratio tests of the random walk hypothesis for European emerging stock markets. The European Journal of Finance, Vol 9(3), p. 290-300.
Ta?, O. & Dursunoglu, S. (2005): Testing Random Walk Hypothesis for Istanbul Stock Exchange. International Trade and Finance Association 15th International Conference. Istanbul, p. 1-17.
Taylor, M. P., Peel, D. A. & Sarno, L. (2001): Nonlinear mean-reversion in real exchange rates: toward a solution to the purchasing power parity puzzles. International Economic Review, p. 1015–1042.
Teräsvirta, T. (1994): Specification, estimation, and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol 89(425), p. 208–218.
Yavuz, N. & Yilanci, V. (2012): Testing for nonlinearity in G7 macroeconomic time series. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, Vol 3, p. 69–7
KILIC, Y., & BUGAN, M. F. (2016). The Efficient Market Hypothesis: Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(10), 237-246.
Copyright: © 2016 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
