International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

The Effect of Freemind on Students’ Performance in an Advanced Financial Accounting Course

Open access
This study examines the effect of using an application of a computer-assisted teaching tool in enhancing the dissemination of knowledge to students in improving their understanding and performance of a course. This study was conducted on undergraduate students who sat for an advanced financial accounting course. The teaching tool known as Freemind was introduced in the class with the aim to mitigate the possibility of knowledge dissemination breakdown due to the reduction of meeting hours of this course from 4 to 3 hours and application of a mass lecture of over 90 students. Based on 160 students as the sample study, this study shows a significant increase in the results of the students when Freemind was adopted as the teaching tool compared to those students who were taught using PowerPoint. This study provides some evidences that students’ performance in advanced financial accounting could be improved with the assistance of Freemind.
• Abdulrahman, K.A. (2007). Factors influencing academic achievement of medical students in the basic medical sciences at a conventional College of Medicine. Working paper, King Saud University, http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/11489/Documents/Download%2014.pdf
• Amare, N. (2006), To slideware or not to slideware: Students’ experiences with PowerPoint vs. lecture. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 36, 297-308
• Anderson, G., Benjamin, D., & Fuss, M, (1994). The determinants of success in university introductory economics course. Journal of Economic Education, 25, 99-120
• Apperson, J.M., Laws, E.L. & Scepansky, J.A. (2008). An assessment of student preferences for PowerPoint presentation structure in undergraduate courses. Computers & Education, 50 (1), 148-153
• Barkley, A. (2004). The determinants of college student performance: The role of assessment method. NACTA Journal, December
• Bartsch R.A. & Cobern K.M., (2003), Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in pictures”, Computers and Education, 41(1), 77-86.
• Benning, V. (1999). Pay raise considered for Fairfax educator, plan links salary, student performance, June
• Blalock, M.G. & Montgomery, R.D. (2005). The effect of PowerPoint on student performance in principles of economics: an exploratory study. Journal for Economics Educators, 5 (3), 1-7
• Borg, M., Shapiro, S. (1996). Personality type and student performance in principles of economics. Journal of Economic Education, 27, 3-25
• Campbell, W.M. & Glezen, G.W. (1989). A investigation of the effect of the accounting information systems course and other variables on student performance in the first auditing course. Paper presented at the AAA Meeting, Honolulu, Hawaii.
• Cheers, B. (1990). Rural disadvantage in Australia. Australian Social Work, 43 (1), 5-13
• Chen, R.; Maksy, M.M., Zheng, L. (2006). Factors associated with students? Performance in advanced accounting and auditing: An empirical study in a public university. Working paper, AAA Midwest Region Meeting, Chicago
• Christensen, T.E., Fogarthy, T.J. & Wallace, W.A. (2002). The association between the directional accuracy of self-efficacy and accounting course. Issues in Accounting Education, 17 (1), 1-26
• Considine, G. & Zappala, G. (2001). Factors influencing the educational performance from students of disadvantaged background. Proceedings from the SPRC Competing Visions: National Social Policy Conference, Sydney
• Deboer, G. (1984). A studying of gender effects in the science and mathematics course-taking behaviour of a group of students who graduated from college in the late 1970’s. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 95-103
• Devadoss, S. & Foltz, J. (1996). Evaluation of factors influencing student class attendance and performance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78 (3), 499-508
• Durden, G.C. & Ellis, L.V. (1995). The effects of attendance on student learning in principles of economics. American Economic Review, 85 (5), 343-346
• Ewer, S., Greer, O., Bridges, W. & Lewis, B. (2002). Class length and student performance: An extended study. International Advances in Economic Research, 8 (2), 160-169
• Frownfelter-Lohrke, C (1998). The effects of differing presentations of general purpose financial statements on users’ decisions. Journal of Information Systems, 12(2), 99-107
• Harknett, R.J. & Cobane, C.T. (1997). Introducing instructional technology to international relations. Political Science and Politics, 30, 496–500.
• Hijazi, S.T. & Naqvi, S.M.M. (2006). Factors affecting students’ performance. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology, 3 (10), 1-10
• Hogarty, K.Y., Lang, T.R. & Kromrey, J.D. (2003). Another look at technology in classrooms: The development and validation of an instrument to measure teachers’ perceptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 139-162
• Horne, R. (2000). The performance of males and females in school and tertiary education. Australian Quarterly, 72 (5/6), 21-26
• Khan, H., Khattak, A.M., Mahsud, I., Munir, A., Ali, S. & Khan, M.H. (2003). Impact of class attendance upon examination results of students in basic medical sciences. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Apr-Jun; 15, 56-58
• Kumar, S (2011). Freemind: Mind-Mapping Software: User Guide, Open Source Mind-Mapping Software,
http://freemind.sourceforge.net/FreeMind%20User%20Guide%20by%20Shailaja%20Kumar%20(manual).pdf
• Nicholson, D.T. (2002). Lecture delivery using MS PowerPoint: Staff and student perspectives at MMU. Learning and Teaching in Action, (2), 14
• Nordstrom, B.H. (1990). Predicting performance in freshman chemistry. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED347065
• Nouri H. & Shahid. A. (2005). The effect of PowerPoint presentations on student learning and attitudes. Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 2, 53-73
• Park, K.H. & Kerr, P.M. (1990). Determinants of academic performance: A multinomial logit approach. Journal of Economic Education, 21, 101-111
• Rankin, E.L. & David, J.H. (2001). The use of PowerPoint and student performance. Atlantic Economic Journal, 1
• Romer, D. (1993). Do students go to class? Should they? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, Summer, 167-174
• Selimoglu, S.K. & Arsoy, A.P (2009). The effect of PowerPoint preferences of students on their performance: A research in Anadolu University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, January, 10 (5).
• Sugahara, S. & Boland, G. (2006). The effectiveness of PowerPoint presentation in the accounting classroom., Accounting Education, 15 (4), 391-403
• Tai, R.H., Sadler, P.M. & Loehr, J.F. (2005). Factors influencing success in introductory college chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42 (9), 987-1012
• Thatcher, A., Fridjhon, P. & Cockcroft, K. (2007). The relationship between lecture attendance and academic performance in an undergraduate psychology class. South African Journal of Psychology, 37 (3), 656-660 Topping, E. (1994). The effects of absences on performance in principles of Macroeconomics. Missouri Academy of Science Annual Meeting. Cape Girardeau, Missouri
• Tho, L.M. (2007). Self-efficacy and student performance in an accounting course. Masalah Pendidikan, 30 (2), 33-48
• Yamamura, J.H., Martin, R.M., Campbell, W.M., Campbell, S.N., Frakes, A. (2000). Performance in auditing: The effect of the accounting information systems course. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Fall, 43-57
Ghani, E. K., & Muhammad, K. (2016). The Effect of Freemind on Students’ Performance in an Advanced Financial Accounting Course. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(7), 234-246.