The goal of this research was to determine the relative contribution of an individual’s personality traits and motives and their interactions with a person’s willingness to take risks in a business environment. The test sample was made up of managers from different hierarchical positions with varied work experiences (N = 172; 55% male). For this research Hogan’s battery tests were chosen.The results of the regression analysis suggest that personality traits and motives are important predictors for willingness to take risks. The individual personality traits that stand out are prudence (?= -.32, p< .01) and inquisitiveness (?=.31, p< .01), and the motives that stand out are hedonism (?= .31, p< .01) and recognition (?=.27, p< .001). On the level of interactions, the significant moderating effects of science on the relationship of inquisitiveness and willingness to take risks (?F= 6.80, p<.01; ?= .223, p< .01) and of affiliation on the relationship of learning approach and willingness to taking risks (?F= 6.01, p<.01; ?= -.183, p< .01) were noted. The results suggest, both directly and indirectly, ways of motivating employees and devising activities tied to changes and risk. The results can be of importance for selecting, recruiting, training and educating managers.
Armenakis, A.A., Harris, S.G., & Mossholder, K.W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46, 681-703.
Arnold, J., Cooper C.L., & Robertson I.T. (2004). Work psychology: understanding human behaviour in organization (5thed). Harlow: FT Prentice Hall.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Barr, P.S., Stimpert, J.L., & Huff, A.S. (1992). Cognitive Change, Strategic Action and Organizational Renewal. Journal of Change Management, 13, 15-36.
Barrick, M.R., & Mount, M.K. (1991). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
Bogicevic-Milikic, B., Janicijevic, N., & Petkovic, M. (2008). HRM in Transition Economies: The Case of Serbia. The South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 3, (2), 75-88.
Canas, J.J., Quesada J.F., Antoli, A., & Fajardo, I. (2003). Cognitive flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes in dynamic complex problem-solving tasks. Ergonomics, 46, 482-501.
Chattopadhayay P., Glick, W.H., & Huber, G. P. (2001). Organizational Actions in Response to Threats and Opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 44, (5), 937-955.
Clifton, J. (2009). Beyond Taxonomies of Influence: “Doing” Influence and Making Decisions in Management Team Meetings. Journal of Business Communication, 46, (1), 57-79.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Corr, P.J., DeYoung, C.G., & McNaughton, N. (2013). Motivation and Personality: A Neuropsychological Perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, (3), 158-175.
Ðurišic-Bojanovi?, M. (2016). The interplay between cognitive styles and organisational change. Journal for East European Management Studies, 21, (1), 35-59.
?uriši?-Bojanovi?, M. (2015). Psihologija organizacionih promena i razvoja. Beograd: Institut za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu.
Fairchild, A. J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2009). A General Model for Testing Mediation and Moderation Effects. The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 10, (2), 87–99.
Fischer, R., & Boer, D. (2014). Motivational Basis of Personality Traits: A Meta-Analysis of Value-Personality Correlations. Journal of Personality, doi: 10.1111/jopy.12125
Figner, B., & Weber, E.U. (2011). Who Takes Risks When and Why?: Determinants of Risk Taking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 211-216.
George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2012). Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hogan, R., & Brent, R. W. (2001). Introduction: Personality and Industrial and Organizational Psychology. In: R.W. Brent & R. Hogan (Eds). Personality Psychology in the Workplace. Washington, DC: APA.
Hogan, R. & Hogan, J. (1996). Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory Manual. Tulsa: Hogan Assessment Systems Inc.
Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1997). Hogan Development Survey Manual. Tulsa: Hogan Assessment Systems Inc.
Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2007). Hogan Personality Inventory Manual. Tulsa: Hogan Assessment Systems Inc.
Holmbeck, G.N. (1997). Toward Terminological, Conceptual, and Statistical Clarity in the Study of Mediators and Moderators: Examples from Child-Clinical and Paediatric Psychology Literature. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, (4), 599-610.
Huisman, M. (2001). Decision-making in meetings as talk-in-interaction. International Studies of Management & Organization, 31, (3), 69-90.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, (2), 263-291.
Lauriola, M., & Levin, I. P. (2001). Relating individual differences in attitude toward ambiguity to risky choices. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, 107–22.
Lauriola, M., Panno, A., Levin, I.P., & Lejuez, C.W. (2014). Individual differences in risky decision making: a meta-analysis of sensation seeking and impulsivity with the balloon analogue risk task. Journal of Behavior and Decision Making, 27, (1), 475-479.
Levin, I.P., Gaeth, G. J., Schreiber, J., & Lauriola, M. (2002). A new look at framing effects: distribution of effect sized, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 411–29.
Malouff, J.M., Thorsteinsson, E.B., & Schutte, N.S. (2006). The Five-Factor Model of personality and smoking: A meta-analysis. Journal of Drug Education, 36, 47-58.
McCrae, R. (2009). The Five-Factor Model of Personality Traits: Consensus and Controversy. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds). The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton-O'Creevy, M., & William, P. (2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8, (2), 157-176.
Oreg, S. (2006). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 73-101.
Parks-Leduc, L., Feldman, G., & Bardi, A. (2015). Personality Traits and Personal Values: A Meta-Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 3-29.
Piderit, S.K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 783-794.
Pinquart, M., Silbereisen, R.K., & Körner, A. (2009). Perceived work-related demands associated with social change, control strategies, and psychological well-being. European Psychologist, 14, (3), 207-223.
Petkovi?, M., Aleksi? A., Miri?, A., & Božinovi?, I. (2010). Corporate Leadership and Knowledge Management. Sociologija, 53, (1), 1-20.
Resick, C. J., Whitman, D. S., Weingarden, S. M., & Hiller, N. J. (2009). The bright-side and the dark-side of CEO personality: examining core self-evaluations, narcissism, transformational leadership, and strategic influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, (6), 1365-1381.
Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. (2013). Organizational Behavior (15th Ed.). Essex: Pearson.
Rokeach, M. (1970). The nature and meaning of dogmatism. In: P.B. Warr (Ed.). Thought and personality. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
Rothmann, S., &Coetzer, E.P. (2003). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29, (1), 68-74.
Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
Shimizu, K., & Hitt A.M. (2004). Strategic flexibility: Organizational preparedness to reverse ineffective strategic decisions. Academy of Management Executive, 18, (4), 44-59.
Soane, E., & Chmiel, N. (2005). Are risk preferences consistent? The influence of decision domain and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1781-1791.
Sun, Y., & Li, S. (2011). Testing the Effect of Risk on Intertemporal Choice in the Chinese Cultural Context, Journal of Social Psychology, 151, (4), 517-522.
Vollrath, M., & Torgersen, S. (2002). Who takes health risks? A probe into eight personality types. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1185-1197.
Vuji?, D. (2015). Kompetencije za rad i rukovo?enje: Novi izazovi primenjene psihologije i menadžment ljudskih resursa. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju.
Watanabe, S., Tareq, M., & Kanazawa, Y. (2011). When openness to experience and conscientiousness affect continuous learning: A mediating role of intrinsic motivation and a moderating role of occupation. Japanese Psychological Research, 53, (1), 1-14.
Zerbe, W., & Paulhus, D. (1987). Socially desirable responding in organizational behavior: A reconception. Academy of Management Review, 12, (2), 250–264.
Zuckerman, M., & Kuhlman, D.M. (2000). Personality and risk taking: common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality, 68, 999-1029.
Mirosava, D.-B., Ana, M., & Rastko, R. (2016). The Managerial Preferences for Risk-Taking in a Business Environment. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(7), 1-14.
Copyright: © 2016 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
