China's rapid expansion of digital education has increased the use of educational technology (EdTech) across primary, secondary, and tertiary teaching. Whether these tools are useful in practice, however, depends on more than access to technology. Teachers must be able to judge whether a digital tool fits the subject matter, the intended pedagogy, and the needs of their learners. This study examined the relationship between Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), perceived EdTech suitability, and teacher readiness among 384 in-service Chinese language teachers in China. Six TPACK components, four dimensions of EdTech suitability, educational effectiveness, content fidelity, feedback, and professional development and three indicators of teacher readiness confidence, digital skills, and perceived barriers were assessed. Correlation, multiple regression, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) were used in the analysis. TPACK explained 45% to 55% of the variance in the four EdTech-suitability dimensions. EdTech suitability was also related to teacher readiness: more favourable evaluations of the technology were associated with greater confidence and stronger digital skills, while perceived barriers were lower. The findings suggest that teacher readiness is shaped not only by what teachers know about technology, pedagogy, and content, but also by whether the available technologies are seen as appropriate for Chinese language teaching. This provides a basis for professional development that combines TPACK development with critical evaluation of the pedagogical fit of EdTech.
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
Celik, I. (2023). Towards intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2022). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge research. Computers & Education, 182.
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2020). Teacher technology change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Emerging technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(3), 4–27.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K–12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education. Boston.
Humaera, I. (2025). The TPACK framework in English language education practice. English Studies in Language Education. https://doi.org/10.58812/esle.v3i01.487
Ismail, I., et al. (2025). Assessing science teachers’ readiness for technology integration. Results in Engineering Education.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2014). What is TPACK? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
Li, M. (2023). Chinese mathematics teachers’ TPACK and attitudes toward ICT integration in the post-pandemic era. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5), em2263. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13346
Li, N., Lau, K. L., Liang, Y., & Chai, C. S. (2024). Pre-service foreign language teachers’ TPACK preparation for technology integration: What are the profiles and key drivers? Asia Pacific Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2415392
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
OECD. (2021). Digital education outlook 2021. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en
Otom, J. E., et al. (2025). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward ICT and TPACK readiness. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.5.31
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2017). The technology acceptance model in education. Computers & Education, 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2025, May 17). Chinese smart education online platform surpasses 164 mln registered users. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/statistics/202505/17/content_WS6828769cc6d0868f4e8f29e4.html
Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S., & Consuegra, E. (2017). A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher’s ICT competencies. Computers & Education, 122, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.002
Trust, T. (2020). The 3 Ts of teacher professional learning: Teams, technology, and time. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36(4), 225–238.
Vanacore, A., Bellini, S., & Di Palma, D. (2025). Evaluating the suitability of educational technology tools: A multidimensional framework for teaching and learning. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1–27.
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2015). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
Choi, L. J., & Bujang, S. (2026). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Educational Technology Suitability in Chinese Language Education: A Structural Equation Modeling Study of Teacher Readiness in China. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(10), 208–221.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
