This research examines the enforcement of arbitral awards in commercial disputes under United Arab Emirates (UAE) legislation, focusing on the problem of reconciling the requirements of international commercial arbitration with adherence to Islamic rules as an integral component of public policy (ordre public). The study originates from the hypothesis that the efficacy of arbitration is not realized merely by the issuance of an award; rather, it materializes during the enforcement stage, which constitutes the true litmus test for the viability of this system. Utilizing an analytical methodology, this study reviews the regulatory legal framework governing the enforcement of arbitral awards pursuant to Federal Law No. (6) of 2018. It elucidates the conditions and procedures required to grant an award executory force, and analyzes the judiciary's role in exercising limited supervisory control restricted to formal, procedural aspects without review on the merits. Furthermore, the study addresses the concept of public policy and its extension to Islamic rules, demonstrating the prominent forms of conflict that may arise between arbitral awards and these rules, such as issues pertaining to usury (riba), uncertainty (gharar), and the illegality of certain contracts. The study concludes that the primary challenge lies in achieving a delicate balance between openness to international arbitration standards and preserving the legislative particularity derived from Islamic Sharia. This necessitates the adoption of a flexible approach that distinguishes between material and non-material non-compliance. The findings also underscore the pivotal role of the judiciary in sustaining this equilibrium by interpreting the concept of public policy in a non-restrictive manner, alongside the importance of the parties' and arbitral tribunals' awareness of the local legal environment to preempt complications at the enforcement stage. Ultimately, the study recommends enhancing the integration between legal frameworks and Sharia reference points to guarantee the efficacy and stability of the commercial arbitration system.
Abdulmalek, F., & Alnimer, R. (2026). Confidentiality in international commercial arbitration: Significance, challenges, and enforcement mechanisms. In Technological innovation and enhancing decision processes in modern enterprises (pp. 657-663). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/[Insert-DOI-If-Available]
Abdel-Qader, Y. A. A. (2026). Al-tahkeem ala darajatayn bayna al-adalah wal-niha'iyah (Dirasah tahliyah naqdiyah) [Arbitration on two levels between justice and finality (A critical analytical study)]. Journal of Humanitarian and Natural Sciences, 7(1), 832-856. (In Arabic).
Aladaseen, M. A. (2026). Unlocking arbitration: Evolving legal standards for commercial agency disputes in Jordan and the UAE. International Journal of Law and Management, 68(3), 554-572. https://doi.org/10.1108/[Insert-DOI-If-Available]
Alhiniti, Y., & Zaid, M. Y. A. (2026). The legal nature of electronic commercial arbitration: A comparative study of international legal systems. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Innovation Management and Risk Management: A Systems (and Network) Perspective, 2409-2420.
Aqil, M. A., & Qala'a, F. (2023). Tanfeedh ahkam al-tahkeem al-tijari fi al-qanoun al-jaza'iri wa ittifaqiyyat New York 1958 [Enforcement of commercial arbitration awards in Algerian law and the 1958 New York Convention] (Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Mohamed El Bachir El Ibrahimi University, Bordj Bou Arréridj). (In Arabic).
Ben Soucha, J., & Khaddour, B. (2025). Ijra'at tanfeedh ahkam al-tahkeem al-tijari al-dawli amama al-qada' al-jaza'iri [Procedures for enforcing international commercial arbitration awards before the Algerian judiciary] (Doctoral dissertation). Library of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, Mohamed El Bachir El Ibrahimi University, Bordj Bou Arréridj, Algeria. (In Arabic).
Hori, M. (2025). Efficiency indicators in online commercial arbitration and their correlation with enforcement success in cross-border disputes. Scientific Journal of Research Studies in Future Law, 3(1), 68-74.
Miri, S. M. (2026). A comparative analysis of the approach of Iranian and English courts to the application of the public policy exception in the enforcement of international commercial arbitration awards. Comparative Civil Procedure, 1(2), e732446.
Shabat, R. T. (2026). Hujjiyat hukm al-tahkeem: Dirasah fiqhiyah wa qanouniyah wa qada'iyah muqaranah [The binding force of the arbitral award: A comparative jurisprudential, legal, and judicial study]. Journal of Humanitarian and Natural Sciences, 7(2), 815-846. (In Arabic).
Wahab, H., & Maramria, W. (2021). Tanfeedh ahkam al-tahkeem al-tijari wifqan lil-ittifaqiyyat al-dawliyah wa ahkam qanoun al-ijra'at al-madaniyah wal-idariyah al-jaza'iri [Enforcement of commercial arbitration awards in accordance with international conventions and the provisions of the Algerian civil and administrative procedures law]. Al-Maydan Journal for Sports, Social and Human Studies, 3(1), 232-245. (In Arabic).
Rashdan, M. M. S., & Marni, N. Bin. (2026). The Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Commercial Disputes: Challenges of Aligning UAE Law with the Necessity of Adherence to Islamic Rules. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(6), 492–502.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
