Emha Ainun Nadjib and Faiz Ahmed Faiz were influential and prolific literary figures from distinct countries and regions. Emha Ainun Nadjib gained prominence in Southeast Asia, particularly Indonesia, while Faiz Ahmed Faiz was celebrated in Pakistan’s literary sphere. Despite their differing social and cultural backgrounds, these differences became points of convergence for their shared ideals. Both poets’ works resonate with powerful critiques and protests the moral failings of authoritarian regimes. This article explores their shared idealism concerning socio-political developments and the struggles of local communities. It emphasizes a comparative analysis to reveal their collective consciousness and shared vision of universal humanity. Using the Prophetic Social Science framework proposed by Kuntowijoyo, the article examines their intellectual and emotional reflections, showcasing humanity's inherent inclination toward goodness. Both poets adeptly highlighted the flaws within their societies’ social structures while condemning cruelty and oppression. Moreover, they envisioned a universal humanity rooted in justice and divine human values. This discourse is significant as it underscores the concept of kaffah, foundational to prophetic ethics, while fostering a deeper awareness of the well-being and dignity of local communities.
Abdul Majid, M. Y., Hajimaming, P., & Ismail, M. Z. (2016). ’Azra’ Jakarta karya Naguib Al-Kilani: Satu bacaan berdasarkan gagasan sastera profetik. Jurnal Melayu, 15(1), 82–98.
Alatas, S. H. (2016). Mitos pribumi malas. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Ali, A. Y. (1998). The Holy Qur’an: Meanings & commentary (Trans.). Tahrike Tarsile Quran Inc.
Aljunied, K. (2022). Shapers of Islam in Southeast Asia. Oxford University Press.
Asfa, W. (2013). Religious pluralism and contested religious authority in contemporary Indonesia Islam: A. Mustofa Bisri and Emha Ainun Nadjib. In J. Burhanuddin & K. Dijk (Eds.), Islam in Indonesia: Contrasting images and interpretations (pp. 162–171). Amsterdam University Press.
Asfa, W. (2016). Religious authority and the prospects for religious pluralism in Indonesia: The role of traditionalist Muslim scholars. Lit Verlag GmbH & Co. KG Wien.
Clark, M. (2001). Shadow boxing: Indonesian writers and the Ramayana in the New Order. Indonesia, 72, 159–187.
Clark, M. (2002). Smells of something like postmodernism: Emha Ainun Nadjib’s rewriting of the Mahabharata. In K. Foulcher & T. Day (Eds.), Clearing a space: Postcolonial readings of modern Indonesian literature (pp. 273–292). KITLV Press.
Devji, F., & Kazmi, Z. (Eds.). (2017). Islam after liberalism. Oxford University Press.
Emha Ainun Nadjib. (2007). Biografi Emha Ainun Nadjib. Retrieved October 23, 2020, from https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B3UxDd4duYHuaDYzaE5sdmJUTTg/edit.
Emha Ainun Nadjib. (2017). Sesobek buku harian Indonesia: Sekumpulan puisi. PT Bentang Pustaka.
Hammond, M. M., & Kim, J. S. (2014). Rethinking empathy through literature. Routledge.
Hanafi, H. (1995). Islam in the modern world: Vol. II Tradition, revolution and culture. The Anglo-Egyptian Bookshop.
Hassan, K. (Ed.). (2006). O city of lights Faiz Ahmed Faiz: Selected poetry and biographical notes. Oxford University Press.
Heddy Shri Ahimsa-Putra. (2016). Paradigma profetik Islam: Epistemologi, etos, dan model. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Hefner, R. W. (2000). Civil Islam: Muslims and democratization in Indonesia. Princeton University Press.
Helmy Nur Laily, Turahmat, & Chamalah, E. (2019). Humanisasi dalam novel Pemimpin Yang Tuhan karya Emha Ainun Nadjib. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v24i1.27631
Hussain, A., Ali, R., & Khalil, A. (2021). A comparative analysis of Percy Bysshe Shelley and Faiz Ahmed Faiz. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies, 4(4), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejlll.v4i4.240
Keen, S. (2022). Empathy and reading: Affect, impact, and the co-creating reader. Routledge.
Kuntowijoyo. (1996). Paradigma Islam: Interpretasi untuk aksi. Penerbit Mizan.
Kuntowijoyo. (1999). Ilmu sosial profetik: Etika pengembangan ilmu-ilmu sosial. Pyramid, 2, 14–23.
Kuntowijoyo. (2001). Muslim tanpa masjid: Esei-esei agama, budaya, dan politik dalam bingkai strukturalisme transendental. Penerbit Mizan.
Kuntowijoyo. (2004). Ilmu sosial profetik sebagai gerakan intelektual. Akademi Kajian Ketamadunan.
Kuntowijoyo. (2017). Petani, priyayi, dan mitos politik: Esei-esei sejarah. Labirin dan Mata Bangsa.
Manheim, K. (1936). Ideology and utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowledge. Harcourt, Brace and World.
Meuleman, J. (2002). Islam in the era of globalization: Muslim attitudes towards modernity and identity. Routledge Curzon.
Mohammadi, D. M. (2017). Causes of General Zia Ul Haq's Islamization program. Retrieved December 2, 2020, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325653742
Muzaffar, C. (2002). Rights, religion and reform: Enhancing human dignity through spiritual and moral transformation. Routledge Curzon.
Nadjib, E. A. (2017). Sesobek buku harian Indonesia: Sekumpulan puisi. PT Bentang Pustaka.
Rahim, R. (2008). In English, Faiz Ahmed Faiz: A renowned Urdu poet. Xlibris Corporation.
Rahman, S. (2002). 100 poems by Faiz Ahmed Faiz (1911–1984): Translated from the original Urdu. Abhinav Publications.
Said, E. W. (2001). Power, politics and culture. Pantheon Books.
Sain, S. (1987). Memory: Poetry of Faiz Ahmad Faiz. Vudya Kitaban Forlag.
Shari’ati, A. (1981). Man and Islam (F. Marjani, Trans.). Free Islamic Literatures Inc.
Syamsul Arifin, Tongat, & Wahyudi. (2018). Intelektualisme profetik: Respons terhadap isu-isu kontemporer di seputar HAM, radikalisme, ekologi, dan pendidikan. UMM Press.
Syarifuddin Jurdi. (2010). Sosiologi Islam dan masyarakat modern: Teori, fakta dan aksi sosial. Kencana Pranada Media Group.
Hassan, A. A., Hamid, M. N. S., & Ali, R. M. (2026). Exploring Universal Humanity, Collective Ideals, and Shared Consciousness in the Works of Emha Ainun Nadjib and Faiz Ahmed Faiz: Insights from Prophetic Social Science. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(6), 211–229.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
