The adoption of accrual accounting in the public sector has been widely promoted as a reform to enhance transparency, accountability, and efficiency. However, emerging evidence suggests a paradox in which these intended benefits are not consistently realised. This conceptual paper critically examines the negative effects of accrual accounting reform by synthesising existing literature across five key themes: evolution over time, theoretical frameworks, research methods, geographical contexts, and organisational settings. Drawing primarily on institutional theory, the paper develops an integrative framework that explains how external pressures drive the adoption of accrual accounting, often resulting in decoupling between formal compliance and practical use. It further identifies a critical source of misalignment at the asset level, where accounting treatment may not reflect the underlying economic intent, leading to distorted decision-making and governance outcomes. By linking macro-level institutional dynamics with micro-level accounting mechanisms, the study provides a comprehensive explanation of why accrual accounting reforms may produce unintended consequences. The paper concludes with practical recommendations aimed at improving the relevance, usability, and contextual alignment of accounting systems in the public sector.
Barton, A. (2009). The use and abuse of accounting in the public sector financial management reform program in Australia. Abacus, 45(2), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00283.x
Broadbent, J., & Guthrie, J. (2008). Public sector to public services: 20 years of “contextual” accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(2), 129–169. DOI:10.1108/09513570810854383
Brusca, I., Gómez-Villegas, M., & Montesinos, V. (2015). Public financial management reforms: The role of IPSAS in Latin America. Public Administration and Development, 35(5), 334–348. DOI:10.1002/pad.1747
Carlin, T. M. (2005). Debating the impact of accrual accounting and reporting in the public sector. Financial Accountability & Management, 21(3), 309–336. DOI:10.1111/j.0267-4424.2005.00223.x
Cavanagh, J., Flynn, S., & Moretti, D. (2016). Implementing accrual accounting in the public sector. International Monetary Fund. DOI:10.5089/9781513589466.005
Chan, J. L. (2003). Government accounting: An assessment of theory, purposes and standards. Public Money & Management, 23(1), 13–20. DOI:10.1111/1467-9302.00336
Christiaens, J., Reyniers, B., & Rollé, C. (2010). Impact of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial information systems. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), 537–554. DOI:10.1177/0020852310372449
Christiaens, J., & Rommel, J. (2008). Accrual accounting reforms: Only for businesslike (parts of) governments. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(1), 59–75. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00443.x
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. January 1983, American Sociological Review 23(2)
Dorn, F., Gaebler, S., & Roesel, F. (2021). Ineffective fiscal rules? The effect of public sector accounting standards on fiscal performance. Public Choice, 186(1–2), 387–406. DOI:10.1007/s11127-019-00755-8
Gårseth-Nesbakk, L., Adhikari, P., & Polzer, T. (2025). Attempts at making public sector accrual accounting and reporting useful and useable: The preparers’ perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 91(3), 448–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523251355761
Hood, C. (1995). The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
Hyndman, N., & Connolly, C. (2011). Accruals accounting in the public sector: A road not always taken. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(1), 36–62. DOI:10.1016/j.mar.2010.10.008
Hyndman, N., Liguori, M., Meyer, R. E., Polzer, T., Rota, S., & Seiwald, J. (2014). The translation and sedimentation of accounting reforms. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(7), 617–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.05.008
Lapsley, I., Mussari, R., & Paulsson, G. (2009). On the adoption of accrual accounting in the public sector. European Accounting Review, 18(4), 719–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180903334960
Lapsley, I., & Pallot, J. (2000). Accounting, management and organizational change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(3), 263–273. DOI:10.1006/mare.2000.0129
Pallot, J. (2001). A decade in review: New public management and accounting reform. International Public Management Journal, 4(2), 199–211.
Pollitt, C. (2003). Public management reform: Reliable knowledge and international experience. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3(3), 121–134. DOI:10.1787/budget-v3-art19-en
Polzer, T., Grossi, G., Reichard, C., & Ruggiero, P. (2021). Implementation of the international public sector accounting standards. Public Money & Management, 41(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2021.1920277
Moretti, D., & Youngberry, T. (2018). Getting added value out of accruals reforms. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 18(2), 1–27. DOI:10.1787/budget-18-5j8l804hpvmt
Van Helden, J., & Reichard, C. (2019). Making sense of the users of public sector accounting information and their needs. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31(4), 478–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-10-2018-0124
Mohamad, R. N. S. B. R., & Mahadi, N. (2026). The Paradox of Accrual Accounting Reform: Transparency, Complexity, and Misalignment in the Public Sector. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(5), 895–906.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
