The current review article aims at classifying, summarizing and organizing some researches conducted about the process of centralization-decentralization and its influence on curricula. Regarding some conducted studies in this area, this paper discusses the condition of decentralization in general and then represents decentralization levels in order to provide the readers more information. Types of decentralization in education are the issues that have been mainly discussed in this paper. The analysis of centralization reduction policies in curriculum of Iran's higher education is the next subject to be discussed; some investigations carried out in this scope are also presented. Then school-based curriculum planning is explored as a practical solution to reduce centralization of curriculum planning system. Finally, after introducing the dualistic (zero or one) view as the main problem that makes educational issues complicated and inefficient, such as in curriculum planning decentralization, the evolution overview is presented from centralization to decentralization and then again turning back to centralization in Iran's and world's curriculum systems. The most important result obtained from this review is that although many theorists and experts in the field of curriculum planning have supported the dominance of decentralization on curricula and have talked about various shortcomings of centralization, the real move towards decentralization of different parts of educational system such as curriculum planning, specially in Iran, is very slow.
Agha Zade, M. (2006). Centralized and decentralized curriculum in education. Paper presented at the fifth conference of Iranian curriculum studies association: Kerman.
Ahmadi, A. (2007). Centralized or decentralized curriculum. Roshd-e-Moalem journal. 25(14).
Amin Khandaghi, M. and Dehghani, M. (2010). Reflecting on centralization, decentralization and returning to centralization. Journal of Educational and psychological studies. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
Amin Khandaghi, M. and Goudarzi, M. A. (2009). Decentralization of curriculum planning system. The conference of centralization and decentralization of curriculum process.
Aziz Zade, H. (2002). School-based management: the analysis of force field for executing school-based management in Iran. The research and educational planning organization. Tehran.
Behrman,J.R et al(2002). Conceptual issues in the role of education decentralization in prompting effective schooling in Asian developing countries.
Bray,M(1999). Control of Education: Issues and Tensions in Centralization and Decntralization. Rowman&Littlefield. Lanham. MD. Chapter8.
Brooks,J and Brooks,M(1993).In search of understanding:The case for constructivist classroom.USA.ASCD(Association Supervision and Curriculum Development.)
Cheng,Y.C(1996). School effectivness and School-Based management. Bristol. PA:Falmer Press.
Colins and Zambon(1994). Decentralization in educational government and management. The international Encyclopedia of Education.USA.
Costa,A and Kallic,B(1995). Assesment in the Learning Organization: Shifting the Paradigm. Assosiation for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria. VA.
Eisner,E(1994). The Educational Imagination: On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs. Macmillan Publishing Company. N.Y.
Florestal and Cooper(1997). Decentralization of Education: Legal Issues. World bank. Washington DC.
Gershberg,A.L(1998). Decentralization and Recentralization: Lessons from the Social Sectors in Mexico and Nicaragua. American Development Bank Social Programs Division. Washington DC.
Goodman,R.A(1982). A study of the institutional level of curriculum decision making through reported practice in selected school districts in Pennsylvania. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Temple University.
Gouya, Z. and Ghadaksaz Khosroshahi, L. (2008). New interpretation of centralization and decentralization in Iran. Curriculum Studies Quarterly. 1 (4).
Howells,H(2003). Teacher professionalism & curriculum power: acautionairy tale. English in Australia. 136(27).
Kliebard,H.M(1975). Reapprasial: The Tyler Rational In Curriculum Theorizing (Pinar). McCutcheon Publishing Corporation.
Mousa Pour, N. (2006). Appreciation of centralization in Iran's curriculum planning system. Conference of Iranian curriculum studies association: Kerman.
Mehr Mohammadi, M. (2009). Analysis of centralization policy in curriculum in Iran's higher education. Iranian higher education journal.
Mehr Mohammadi, M. (2006). Modifications in Chinese curriculum. The speech presented in academic conference of Iranian curriculum studies association.
Mehr Mohammadi, M. (2003). Curriculum: views, spproaches and overlooks. Astan-e-Qods publication: Mashhad.
Nasr Isfahani, A. R. (2003). School-based curriculum.
Piri, M. et al. (2012). School-based curriculum; a strategy for decentralizing curriculum planning system. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 1 (1).
Salsabili, N. (2008). The movement of Iran's curriculum planning system towards decentralization of curriculum design with an emphasis on school-based curriculum. Curriculum Studies Quarterly. 1 (4).
Schwab,J(1969). The Practical: A Language for Curriculum. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Assosiation. Los Angles.
Sharon,M and Chung,J(2000). School improvement in Taiwan: Problems and Possibilities. Paper Presented at International Congress for School Effectivness and Improvement. Hongkong.
Short,E(1991). Forms of Curriculum Inquiry. State University of New York Press.
Tyler,R.(1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction.USA: University of Chicago Press.
Vientian, Lao(2002). Designing and Implementing Local Curricula. Final report of Building the Capacities of Curriculum specialists for Educational Reform. UNESCO International Bureau of Education. Bangkok.
Zar Afshan, A. (2006). Review panel of analysis and evaluation of curriculum planning system in education from centralized and decentralized perspective. Conference of Iranian curriculum studies association: Kerman.
Zouelm, A. (2006). Review panel of analysis and evaluation of curriculum planning system in education from centralized and decentralized perspective. Conference of Iranian curriculum studies association: Kerman.
Copyright: © 2013 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
