Criminology investigation, needs to expressing crime and its properties, nature and limitation. In other words, inherently and primarily crime is suspended in incorporation of public and private criminal laws requirements. It is clear that any act or it's quitting or behavior that result in legislator's considering punishment and applying criminal sanction, is explained as crime and is the criminology result. (1) This definition is the result of a specific thought in Tradition and Divine laws . Along with any title, criminology, recalls specific explanation, however in general, to legislator's opinion, inference is affected by attention to special principles in considering an act as crime and in Iran's criminal law, and this assumption is according to Islamic generalization (2) and its resultant Islamic Law. Criminology is known as a process according to which legislator prohibits an act or its quitting and applies criminal sanction on it by considering basic social norms and values and based on his accepted theoretical bases which are affected by a specific doctrinal system. (3)
Kinsella, C. & McGarry, J. (2011) ‘Computer Says No: Technology and Accountability in Policing Traffic Stops’ 55 Crime, Law and Social Change .pp 167-184.
Douglas A. Knight and Amy-Jill Levine (2011). The Meaning of the Bible. New York: Harper Collins. pp. 124-133.
Moosavi, Leon (2012) British Muslim Converts Performing `Authentic Muslimness? Performing Islam vol 1, pp 103-128.
Millie, A. and Das, D.K. (eds.) (2008) Contemporary Issues in Law Enforcement and Policing, Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press (Taylor & Francis) ,pp35-68.
Barton, A. and Brown, A. (2012) ‘Dark Tourism and the Prison’, Prison Service Journal, No 199, pp. 44-49.
Peters, E. (2012) ‘Social Work and Social Control in the Third Sector: Re-Educating Parents in the Voluntary Sector Practice, Social Work in Action, Volume 24, pp41-93.
Millie, A. (2011) ‘Value judgments and criminalization’, Invited Paper, Department of Urban Studies Workshop Series, University of Glasgow, February 2011, pp87-92.
Mackenzie, S., Bannister, J., Flint, J., Parr, S., Millie, A. and Fleetwood, J. (2010) ‘The Drivers of Perceptions of Anti-Social Behavior’, Home Office Research Report 34, London: Home Office, pp56-90.
E, Mags; [http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/2/311.abstract]
E, Mags; [http://archive.org/stream/britishjournalof53roya/britishjournalof53roya_djvu.txt]
E, Mags; [http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/browse?module_0=obo-9780195396607]
E, Mags;[http:// www.lancs.ac.uk/jais/volume/docs/vol4/4_111-131serajzade1.pdf]
E, Mags;[ http://euc.sagepub.com/content/7/2/159.abstract]
E, Mags;[ http://www.iup.edu/page.aspx?id=56983]
E, Mags;[ http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/6/1/21]
E, Mags;[ http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/1/1/5]
Copyright: © 2013 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
