International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Store Image and Private Label Brands in Zimbabwe: Relationship with General Perception, Perceived Risk and Quality

Open access
Private label brand market penetration is estimated at less than 8% in Southern Africa. Retailers need to develop strategies that will drive growth of the industry. A survey was conducted to quantify the effect of two store image dimensions on general private label brand perception as well as the effect of the store image dimensions on perceived risk and quality of private label brands. Data collected was analysed using simple linear regression. Results illustrated that perceived store general image as well as store layout and services had a significant (p < 0.05) and positive effect on general private label brand perception. A higher perception of store image dimensions reduced the perceived risk of purchasing private label brands and the effect was significant (p < 0.05). Store image dimensions did not have a significant effect on perceived quality of private label brands. The authors concluded that there is scope to improve PLB perception among consumers in Zimbabwe through improvements in store image dimensions. They recommended that retailers hone on store image through measures such as selling a wide selection of good quality products; the creation of a good store atmosphere and investment in the training of staff in customers care.
1. Beneke, J. (2010), Consumer Perception of Private Label Brands within the Retail Grocery Sector of South Africa. African Journal of Business Management 4(2):203-220

2. Collins-Dodd, C. and Lindley, T. (2003), Store Brands and Retail Differentiation: The Influence of Store Image and Store Brand Attitude on Store Own Brand Perceptions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services10, 345-352.

3. Cronbach, L.J., (1987), Statistical Tests for Moderated Variables: Flaws in Analyses Recently Proposed. Psychology Bulletin 102 (3): 414-417.

4. DelVecchio, D. (2001), Consumer Perceptions of Private Label Quality: The Role of Product Category Characteristics and Consumer use of Heuristics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 8 (2001):239-249

5. Euromonitor International. (2010), Do brands still matter? – Focus on Private Label Packaged Food. From: www.euromonitor.com (accessed 20 February 2013)

6. Fernie, J., Fernie, S., Moore, C. (2003), Principles of Retailing, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford.

7. Keller, K. L. (1993), Conceptualizing, Measuring, Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing 57(1): 1-22.

8. Martin, P. (2008), Private Label Trends Worldwide. Presentation made in September 2008, in Mumbai. From www.planetretail.net (accessed 4 May 2013).

9. Mukucha, P., Musekiwa, A., Chirimubwe, R.G., Jaravaza, D.C and Nyengerai, S. (2012), Customer’s Emotional Responses to Employees’ Displayed Positive Emotions. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research 2(6): 40-46
10. Richardson, P.S., Jain, A.K. and Dick A. (1996), Household Store Brand Proneness: A Framework. Journal of Retailing 72 (2): 159-185

11. Rzem, H. and Debabi M. (2012), Store Image as a Moderator of Store Brand Attitude. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly 4(1): 130-148

12. Semeijn, J., van Riel, A.C.R and Ambrosini A.B. (2004), Consumer Evaluations of Store Brands: Effects of Store Image and Product Attributes. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 11:247-258

13. Vahie, A. and Paswan, A. (2006), Private Label Brand Image: Its relationship with Store Image and National Brand. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 34 (1):67-84

14. Van Riel, A.C.R., Lemmink J. and Ouwersloot, H. (2001), Consumer` Evaluations of Brand Extensions: Differences between Goods and Services. Journal of Service Research 3 (3): 220–231.