It is often taken for granted that students who are enrolled in a said Bachelor’s Degree course in a university should have a much better understanding of the said subject then when they were in school. Studies conducted have shown that this may not necessarily be the case. They are often unable to apply the concepts that have been studied in the introductory Physics course to the task of solving related problems. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the level of Newtonian Physics conceptual understanding of university students enrolled in Science Education courses in order to investigate their preparedness in becoming future Physics teachers. This survey-based study involved a sample of 200 third-year B.Sc.Ed students from three universities in Malaysia. Data collected from the Test of Conceptual Understanding of Newtonian Physics was analyzed descriptively and inferentially to determine the level of the students’ Newtonian Physics conceptual understanding. The findings confirmed that generally, undergraduates’ students are still having problems to conceptually understand physics concepts taught at them.
Brandsford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implication. In Review of Research Education, ed. A. Iran-Nejad & P.D. Pearson, Wasington D.C.: AERA 1999, pp. 61-100.
Boudreax, A. (2004). Tracing difficulties with relativistically invariant mass to difficulties with vector addition of momentum in Newtonian context. In Marx, Heron, Franklin, eds. 2004 Physics Education Research Conference, Sacramento, California. 4-5 August 2004. American Institute of Physics Conference Proceeding.
Girard, M., & Wong, D. (2002). An aesthetic (Deweyan) perspective on science learning: case studies of three fourth graders. The elementary school journal, 102(3), 199-224.
Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985a). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics 53: 1043.
Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985b). Common sense concept about motion. American Journal of Physics 53: 1056 - 1065.
Hestenes, D. & Wells, M. (1992). A Mechanics Baseline Test. The Physics Teacher, 30, 159-165.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., Swackhamer, G., (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3): 141-151.
Khalijah Mohd. Salleh, T. Subahan Mohd. Meerah, & Khyasudeeen Abd. Majid (1991). Force and motion (Results in Malaysia), ASPEN APPTEA Workshop II on research for students, conceptual structures and changes in learning Physics. Asian Physics, Education Network, University of Philippines, Manila, hlm. 89 – 106. Disebut dlm. T. Subahan Mohd. Meerah. 1999. Dampak penyelidikan pembelajaran Sains terhadap perubahan kurikulum. Syarahan Perdana Jawatan Profesor. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Kim. E., & Pak, S. (2001). Students do not overcome conceptual difficulties after solving 1000 traditional problems. American Journal of Physics 70 (7): 759.
Lee M, Ahmad Nurulazam Md. Zain, & Seth Sulaiman. 1992. Salahkonsepsi di kalangan murid-murid sekolah menengah dalam beberapa topik Fizik. Unit Penyelidikan Pendidikan Asas, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Lilia Halim. (1998). Keupayaan guru siswazah pra-perkhidmatan menerang konsep asas mata pelajaran Fizik di peringkat menengah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan UKM 23.
Lilia Halim, Abd. Razak Habib, Abd. Rasyid Johar, & T. Subahan Mohd. Meerah (2001). Tahap pengetahuan pedagogi kandungan guru pelatih Fizik dan bukan Fizik melalui pengajaran eksplisit dan implisit. Jurnal Pendidikan UKM 26: 65-80.
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction. A User Manual. New Jersey:Prentice Hall
McDermott, L.C. (1993). Guest comment: How we teach and how students learn – A mismatch? American Journal of Physics 61: 295 – 298.
NAEP (National assessment of Educational Progress). (2005). Science Conceptual Understanding. Retrieved from
http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
Trowbridge, D. E., & McDermott, L. C. (1980). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension. American Journal of Physics 48 (12):1020.
Trowbridge, D. E., & McDermott, L. C. (1981). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension. American Journal of Physics 49(3):242.
Van Heuvelen, A. (1991). Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies. American Journal of Physics 59: 891 - 897.
Van Heuvelen, A. (1991). Overview case study physics. American Journal of Physics 59 (10): 898 – 907.
Yusof Hashim. (1994). Salah konsep di kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat tentang tajuk Daya Newton. Masters Dissertation. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Copyright: © 2011 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
