This study presents a targeted bibliometric analysis of Corporate Sustainability Performance (CSP) research. To ensure thematic precision, a title-based search strategy was employed. The study examined 263 peer-reviewed articles indexed in Scopus between 2008 and 2025. Analytical tools were used to assess publication trends, keyword co-occurrence, citation patterns, and thematic development. The analysis reveals a consistent increase in CSP publications, particularly after 2015, reflecting a rising global emphasis on corporate accountability and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. Country-level findings show growing contributions from South and Southeast Asia, with notable citation impact from emerging economies, marking a shift from earlier Western-centric patterns. Thematic mapping identifies corporate social responsibility (CSR), stakeholder theory, and corporate governance as dominant research clusters. Meanwhile, topics such as big data analytics, dynamic capabilities, and social aspects related to appear as less developed yet highly-integrated themes. Construct such as information sharing is peripheral, suggesting gaps in theoretical application. Temporal analysis shows a progression from normative CSR narratives toward performance-based sustainability frameworks aligned with institutional and investor demands. This study contributes a focused and conceptually coherent mapping of CSP literature. By identifying mature, fragmented, and underexplored areas, it offers a critical foundation for advancing theoretical development, addressing regional imbalances, and responding to emerging intersections between sustainability and digital transformation. The findings provide researchers, policy makers, and practitioners with evidence to inform future inquiry and sustainability strategy design.
Ahmi, A. (2023). OpenRefine: An approachable tool for cleaning and harmonizing bibliographical data. 11th International Conference on Applied Science and Technology 2022 (11th ICAST 2022) AIP Conference Proceedings, 2827, 030006-1-030006–030011. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0164724
Ahmi, A. (2024) biblioMagika, available from https://bibliomagika.com
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Artiach. (2010). The determinants of corporate sustainability performance. Accounting and Finance, 50(1), 98-116.
Brundtland, G.H., 1987. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
De Vries, B., Van Smeden, M., Rosendaal, F., & Groenwold, R. (2020). Title, abstract and keyword searching resulted in poor recovery of articles in systematic reviews of epidemiologic practice. Journal of clinical epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.009.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science, 60(11), 1-20.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone.
Gardazi, S., Hassan, A., & Bello, M. (2023). A Bibliometric Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Performance: Current Status, Development and Future Trends. International Journal of Professional Business Review.HMaia et al. (2020). Corporate sustainability during a pandemic: Evidence from a global survey. Sustainability, 12(6), 2273.
HMaia. (2020). Corporate sustainability during a pandemic: Evidence from a global survey. Sustainability, 12(6), 2273.
Kantabutra, S. (2022). Toward a system theory of corporate sustainability: an interim struggle. Sustainability, 14(23), 15931. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315931
Mal, H., Varma, M., & Vishvakarma, N. K. (2023). An empirical study to prioritize the determinants of corporate sustainability performance using analytic hierarchy process. Measuring Business Excellence, 27(2), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-10-2021-0133
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 339(jul21 1), b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2007). Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences' literature. J. Informetrics, 1, 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.001.
Saulick, P., Bokhoree, C., & Bekaroo, G. (2023). Business sustainability performance: A systematic literature review on assessment approaches, tools and techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136837.
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In Measuring Scholarly Impact (pp. 285–320). Springer International Publishing.
Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123, 321 - 335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8.
Ibrahim, N., & Mahadi, N. (2026). Corporate Sustainability Performance: Reflection and Future Perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(2), 907–913.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
