Digital platforms are increasingly used to facilitate animal adoption, yet many existing systems remain transactional, fragmented, and emotionally disconnected from the ethical and social nature of adoption decisions. In multicultural contexts such as Malaysia, these limitations are compounded by issues of accessibility, trust, and uneven digital literacy. This study proposes a conceptual framework for designing an empathetic and inclusive digital animal adoption marketplace that integrates functional usability with emotional and ethical considerations. Drawing on theories from user experience (UX), customer experience (CX), technology acceptance (TAM and UTAUT), service-dominant logic, inclusive design, and emotional design, the framework explains how digital empathy, accessibility, and trust interact to shape users’ perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, adoption intention, satisfaction, and long-term platform sustainability. Using a systematic review of prior literature, the study develops a set of theoretically grounded propositions linking emotional, cognitive, and behavioral constructs within a unified adoption ecosystem. The framework conceptualizes animal adoption platforms as value co-creation environments in which adopters, shelters, and digital systems collectively contribute to humane and sustainable outcomes. The study contributes theoretically by extending technology acceptance models to socially oriented digital services through the integration of empathy and inclusivity. Practically, it offers design-oriented insights for developers, non-governmental organizations, and policymakers seeking to improve animal welfare outcomes through compassionate, accessible, and trustworthy digital adoption systems in Malaysia.
Almaslukh, F. M. O., & Khalid, H. (2022). The Influence of Internal Marketing Practices in the Banking Sector: A Systematic Review Approach. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(8), 1951-1964.
Benis, A., Haghi, M., Deserno, T. M., & Tamburis, O. (2023). One digital health intervention for monitoring human and animal welfare in smart cities: Viewpoint and use case. JMIR medical informatics, 11, e43871.
Beyer, K. (2023). Customer experiences drive the need of innovation in veterinary practices. Procedia Computer Science, 225, 3094-3103.
Cao, D., & White, S. (Eds.). (2016). Animal law and welfare-international perspectives (Vol. 53). Switzerland: Springer.
Fuentes, S., Viejo, C. G., Tongson, E., & Dunshea, F. R. (2022). The livestock farming digital transformation: implementation of new and emerging technologies using artificial intelligence. Animal health research reviews, 23(1), 59-71.
Fuentes, S., Viejo, C. G., Tongson, E., & Dunshea, F. R. (2022). The livestock farming digital transformation: Implementation of new and emerging technologies using artificial intelligence. Animal health research reviews, 23(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252322000142
Haddy, E., Brown, J., Burden, F., Raw, Z., Kaminski, J., & Proops, L. (2023). Sustainability in NGO programming: A case study of working equid welfare organizations. SAGE Open, 13(4), 21582440231218523.
Horecka, K., & Neal, S. (2022). Critical problems for research in animal sheltering, a conceptual analysis. Frontiers in veterinary science, 9, 804154.
Ismail, S. N. (2017). Understanding the Emergence, Development and Trajectories of New Social Movements (NSMs) in Industrial Countries & Non-Post-Materialist Societies: The Case of Animal Protection Movement in Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield).
Jamil, M. H. M. (2025). Congruence effects in social media influencer marketing in online impulse buying intentions of digital immigrants: The mediating role of descriptive and injunctive norms. Journal of Marketing Communications, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2025.1897358
Kamarudin, S., Shoaib, H. M., Jamjoom, Y., Saleem, M., & Mohammadi, P. (2023). Students’ behavioural intention towards e-learning practices through augmented reality app during COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5715-5731.
Li, Y. H., & Tang, H. H. (2024). How to use service prototypes to reduce the complexity of social problems: A Case Study of Adoption Services of Public Animal Shelter.
Liu, J., & Wu, Y. (2023, July). Research on the Strategy of Digital Services in the Adoption Scene of Pet Shelters. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 189-201). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Lyu, Q., Dai, X., Ni, J. Q., Wang, F., Xi, L., An, X., & Wang, K. (2025). Embracing digital transformation in animal science education: Exploring students’ digital self-efficacy, technological literacy, and perspectives of curriculum updates. Education and Information Technologies, 30(8), 10443-10462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10849-4
Mandviwalla, M., & Flanagan, R. (2021). Small business digital transformation in the context of the pandemic. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(4), 359-375.
Matheny, G., & Leahy, C. (2007). Farm-animal welfare, legislation, and trade. Law & Contemp. Probs., 70, 325.
Mellor, D., Yeow, J., Mamat, N. H. B., & Hapidzal, N. F. B. M. (2008). The relationship between childhood cruelty to animals and psychological adjustment: A Malaysian study. Anthrozoös, 21(4), 363-374.
Powell, L., Ackerman, R., Reinhard, C. L., Serpell, J., & Watson, B. (2024). A prospective study of mental wellbeing, quality of life, human-animal attachment, and grief among foster caregivers at animal shelters. Plos one, 19(5), e0301661.
RANI, M. A., GOH, S. H., RAHMAN, M. S. A., & ROSLAN, M. A. (2020). Serological detection of anti-Leptospira antibodies among animal caretakers, dogs and cats housed in animal shelters in Peninsular Malaysia. Sains Malaysiana, 49(5), 1121-1128.
Saleem, M., Kamarudin, S., Shoaib, H. M., & Nasar, A. (2022). Retail consumers’ behavioral intention to use augmented reality mobile apps in Pakistan. Journal of Internet Commerce, 21(4), 497-525.
Saleem, M., Kamarudin, S., Shoaib, H. M., & Nasar, A. (2023). Influence of augmented reality app on intention towards e-learning amidst COVID-19 pandemic. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(5), 3083-3097.
Saleem, M., Khalid, H., Shoaib, H. M., Almaslukh, F. M., Wijenayake, A., & Nasar, A. (2025b). Behavioral intention to adopt FinTech services: A comparative study between digital immigrants and digital natives in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (ISSN 1997-8553), 19(2), 279-306.
Saleem, M., Khalid, H., Wijenayake, A., Gaete-Sepulveda, M. A., Almaslukh, F. M., & Mahroof, K. (2025a). The impact of supply chain management 4.0 on the performance of the tea manufacturing firms: mediating role of market and entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
Shoaib, H. M., & Saleem, M. (2023). An online market in your pocket: how does an augmented reality application influence consumer purchase decision. In Technological sustainability and business competitive advantage (pp. 307-313). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Tan, K. L., Wang, P., Sun, R., Wong, C. Y., Wood, J., Agarwal, M., ... & Eijdenberg, E. L. (2025). Enhancing animal care through digital tools: a challenge and hindrance perspective of technology adoption in a zoological institution. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1-20.
Thielke, L. E., & Udell, M. A. (2019). Characterizing human–dog attachment relationships in foster and shelter environments as a potential mechanism for achieving mutual wellbeing and success. Animals, 10(1), 67.
Wang, H., Qi, J. F., Qin, R., Ding, K., Graham, D. W., & Zhu, Y. G. (2023). Intensified livestock farming increases antibiotic resistance genotypes and phenotypes in animal feces. Communications Earth & Environment, 4(1), 123.
Wolf, P. J., Levy, J., Amirian, E. S., & Horecka, K. (2022). Reimagining animal sheltering: Support services and community-driven sheltering methods. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, 1011202.
Ahmad, E. T., & Khalid, H. (2026). Designing an Empathetic and Inclusive Digital Animal Adoption Marketplace: A Conceptual Framework for Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(2), 498-512.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
