International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

From Compliance to Institutionalization: Environmental, Social, and Governance Acceptance in Malaysia’s Manufacturing Workforce Development

Open access
The growing prominence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles has intensified the need for sustainable and future-ready workforce systems in manufacturing industries worldwide. In Malaysia, however, ESG adoption within the manufacturing sector remains uneven, with many efforts focused on compliance and reporting rather than meaningful integration into workforce development. Although national initiatives such as the Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry’s i-ESG Framework and the Human Resource Development Corporation’s (HRD Corp) sustainability programs have strengthened policy direction, limited empirical research has examined how ESG principles are interpreted, enacted, and institutionalized across manufacturing workplaces and Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) environments. This gap underscores the need to understand the social, cultural, and institutional processes shaping ESG acceptance within Malaysia’s manufacturing ecosystem. Guided by the interpretivist paradigm and employing Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT), this study explores how manufacturing stakeholders conceptualize and socially construct ESG meanings, how ESG acceptance is enacted through workplace interactions and practices, and what challenges and enabling conditions influence the integration of ESG-related competencies in workforce development. Using purposive and theoretical sampling, the study will involve manufacturing practitioners, TVET educators, and policymakers from HRD Corp and the Department of Skills Development (JPK). Data will be collected through semi-structured interviews and document analysis, and analyzed using iterative coding, constant comparison, and theoretical integration. The study is expected to yield a typology of ESG conceptualizations within workforce contexts, an empirically grounded understanding of factors that hinder or support ESG competency integration, and a dynamic grounded theory model explaining how ESG acceptance emerges and becomes institutionalized across industry, education, and policy interfaces. Theoretically, the study advances understanding of ESG as a socially constructed process, while practically offering insights to strengthen policy alignment, curriculum design, and capacity-building efforts for Malaysia’s sustainability- driven manufacturing workforce.
Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2024). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity.
Buniamin, S. (2020). Managers’ perceptions on stakeholder power in relation to ESG reporting. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 14(1), 45–58.
Campbell, K., Orr, E., Durepos, P., Nguyen, L., Li, L., Whitmore, C., Gehrke, P., Graham, L., & Jack, S. (2021). Reflexive thematic analysis for applied qualitative health research. The Qualitative Report, 26(6), 1928–1943.
Charmaz, K. (2021). The genesis, grounds, and growth of constructivist grounded theory.
Chia, C.-K., Razak, A. Z. A., & Ghavifekr, S. (2023). Grounded theory approach in university leadership succession planning model development: From the methodological perspective. The Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research.
Durand, M. A., de Brún, A., & Humphries, N. (2022). Building theory through quality criteria in realistic evaluation. Evaluation, 28(1), 8–25.
Hasanah, U., & Prabowo, T. J. W. (2024). The impact of culture in shaping ESG disclosure: A systematic review of multinational practices. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 26(1), 45–60.
Hock, O. J., Khatibi, A., Zunirah, B., & Mohd Talib, A. (2025). Challenges faced by Malaysian MSMEs to adopt ESG standards. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(1), 23–34.
Hussin, S. N. A., Nik Wan, N. Z., Abd Aziz, A. A., Zakaria, R. A., & Che Hassan, N. A. (2025). Determinants of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure among publicly listed companies in Malaysia: A conceptual review. Advanced International Journal of Business Entrepreneurship and SMEs, 7(1), 88–102.
Jiang, J., Wang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2023). Thematic analysis in policy implementation: A cross-case study approach. Policy Studies.
Keane, E. (2025). Constructivist grounded theory in qualitative research for social justice: Purpose, process, promise. New Trends in Qualitative Research.
Lee, P., & Anderson, J. (2020). Privacy and confidentiality in qualitative interviews: Ethical and methodological implications. Ethics & Behavior, 30(4), 275–288.
Mohajan, D., & Mohajan, H. (2022). Constructivist grounded theory: A new research approach in social science. Research and Advances in Education, 1(2), 45–63.
Mukhtar, B., Shad, M. K., Woon, L., Haider, M., & Waqas, A. (2023). Integrating ESG disclosure into the relationship between CSR and green organizational culture toward green innovation. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(4), 581–596.
Ng, S. H., Ng, C., & Johl, S. K. (2023). Overview of ESG practices in Malaysia with introduction of conceptual framework. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(5), 32–47.
Nik Mahdi, N. A., Fernando, Y., & Ibrahim, A. (2024). Revealing the path to a green economy: Insights and recommendations for sustainable development in Malaysia. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 16(1), 33–48.
Ong, J. H., Khatibi, A., Zunirah, B., & Mohd Talib, A. (2025). Challenges faced by Malaysian MSMEs to adopt ESG standards. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 10(1), 44–59.
Ratnasingam, J., Ab Latib, H., Lim, C. L., Jegatheswaran, N., & Othman, K. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance adoption in the Malaysian wood products and furniture industries: Awareness, adoption, and challenges. BioResources, 18(4), 5120–5141.
Saedin, A., Noranee, S., Ahmad, N., Abas, M. K., Mohd, I. H., & Islam, T. (2024). The impact of training and development, job embeddedness, and flexible working arrangements on talent retention among young generations in pharmaceutical companies in Malaysia. Information Management and Business Review.
Salin, A. S. A., Shamsudin, S. M., Omar, N., & Abdul Raman, S. (2023). ESG compliance: Challenges for MSMEs in Malaysia. I-iECONS e-Proceedings, 14(1), 210–219.
Santuah, R., & Abazaami, J. (2021). Protecting participant confidentiality in qualitative research: Ethical dilemmas and strategies.
Smith, A., & Johnson, T. (2021). Building participant trust through informed consent: A cornerstone of ethical research. Research Ethics Review, 17(3), 214–226.
Smith, P., Brown, J., & Keller, D. (2022). Safeguarding participant confidentiality in applied social research. Journal of Ethics in Human Research, 28(1), 33–48.
Stough, L. M., & Lee, S. (2021). Grounded theory approaches used in educational research journals. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20.
Vinayan, G., Harikirishanan, D., & Ling, S. M. (2020). Upskilling and reskilling the workforce via industry-driven technical and vocational education and training: Strategies to initiate industry–institution partnerships in Malaysia. Journal of Economic Info, 7(2), 94–103.
Wang, Z., Zihan, W., & Li, M. (2024). Green human resource management and organizational readiness for sustainability transformation in emerging economies. Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Studies.
Wong, W. C., Batten, J. A., Mohamed-Arshad, S. B., Nordin, S., & Adzis, A. A. (2021). Does ESG certification add firm value? Finance Research Letters, 39, Article 101593.
Yusoff, H., Aziz, N., & Ismail, R. (2023). Effects of environmental and social disclosure practices on firm risks: Evidence from a developing nation. Review of Economics & Finance, 21(2), 110–126.
Dawi, O. B. M., Jopri, M. H. Bin, & Kamarudin, M. F. Bin. (2026). From Compliance to Institutionalization: Environmental, Social, and Governance Acceptance in Malaysia’s Manufacturing Workforce Development. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(2), 87–95.