The purpose of this study was to find out if sentences imposed on offenders were effective in rehabilitating them, focusing on recurrent offenders. The main aim was to conclude whether sentences imposed on offenders were effective enough to rehabilitate offenders or not. The study focused on prison conditions, processes and activities and how they affect inmates during the rehabilitation process. The research design used for this was mixed methods approach. The study consisted of a sample of 30 respondents. Ten (10) prison officials were given questionnaires and twenty (20) re-current offenders had to answer questionnaires and interviewed. Successful re-integration of offenders in the society depends on the individual since evidence suggests that activities and processes found in prison are rehabilitative. The study concluded that sentences imposed on offenders were rehabilitative although change of behaviour varies from individual to individual, and recommended the society in general and the government to interfere into the processes and conditions found in prison.
Haney C. (2001) The Psychological Impact of Incarceration, Implications for Post-Prison
Adjustment, California, University of California
Cooper (2011), Quasi-experimentation, Design and Analysis, Issues for Field Studies, Chicago Rand McNally
Dissel A. (2006) Rehabilitation and Integration in African Prison, London, Thomson Brooks
Gullen C. and Gendreau P (2000), “Re-examining the Cruel and Unusual Punishment of Prison Life,” Law and Human Behaviour, Colombia Human Rights Law Review, 41, 99-210
Moore B. (2008) In Depth Interviewing in Soeters J., Shields P. And Rietjens S. (eds) Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Military Studies, London, Routledge Books
National Museum of Crime and Punishment (2004), London, Washington D.C. – Crime Library
Moyo, W., & Muchibo, M. (2015). The Rehabilitative Effectiveness of Sentences Imposed On Offenders in the Zimbabwean Prisons: A Focus on Recurrent Offenders. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(11). 319-330.
Copyright: © 2015 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
