The aim for this study is to explore the types of web-based asynchronous peer feedback in enhancing the development of learner autonomy in writing. Ten respondents are involved in this interpretive qualitative study. They are from public universities. The data are collected from interviews, journal entries, essay drafts and feedback transcripts. All data are consistently compared and contrasted to yield an exhaustive analysis. The data are analyzed using thematic analysis and interpreted accordingly. The findings disclose that there are three types of WAPF delivered by the peers. They are Social, Affective and Cognitive WAPF. There are nine sub-categories of Social WAPF at personal level, eight sub-categories of Affective WAPF at personal and text levels, and four sub-categories for Cognitive WAPF at text level. It is clear that the respondents in this study are able to develop their autonomy abilities in writing through the WAPF. Ultimately, the respondents are able to reflect, decide and revise better in their writing.
Norlida, A. Rohizani, Y. & Puteri, R. M., Abdul, R. (2004). Towards learner autonomy in teaching English in Malaysia. Proceeding of 4th International Symposium on ELT, Beijing, China.
Benson, P. (2006). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Chen, Y. L., Liu, E. Z. F., Shih, R. C., Wu, C. T., & Yuan, S. M. (2011). Use of peer feedback to enhance elementary students’ writing through blogging. British Journal of Educational Technology. 42(1) : E1-E4.
Deci, E.L. & Ryan, M.R. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 11 (4) : 227-268.
DiGiovanni, E., & Nagaswami, G. (2001). Online peer review: An alternative to face-to-face? ELT Journal. 55(3) : 263-272.
Dippold, D. (2009). Peer feedback through blogs: Student and teacher perceptions in an advanced German class.ReCALL.21(1): 18-36
Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Belland, B. & Camin, D. (2007). Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: an exploratory study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 12: 412–433.
Faizah, M. (2004).The effects of internet-assisted language learning environment in the development of L2 students’ critical thinking skills. Unpublished PhD thesis. Islamic International Univ. Gombak, Kuala Lumpur.
Guardado, M., & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback. Science Direct: Computers and composition 24: 443-461.
Hui,T. (2005). Training Students to Become Successful Peer Reviewers. Science Direct. 33 (2) : 293-308.
Hui, C. L. & Shih, C. C. (2009). An Investigation into Effectiveness of Peer Feedback . Journal of Applied Foreign Languages Fortune Institute of Technology. 3 : 79-87.
Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching. 39 (2): 83-101
Hyland, K. (2000). ESL writers and feedback, giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research.4 (33).
Junaidah , J. (2007). exploring readiness for language learning autonomy
among distance learners in Sabah, Malaysia. Asian Journal of Distance Education. l5(1) : 16 – 26.
Kirszner, L. and Mandell, S. (1988). Writing: A College Rhetoric (2 nd ed.) . New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Liu. J. & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms: The Univ. of Michigan Press.
Liu, J. & Sadler, R.W. (2003) The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2 : 193-227
Lu. J. & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instr Sci. 40 :257–275.
Mahmood, Z., Lasan, C., Nik Yusoff, N.M.R. & Embi, M.A. (2009). Teaching and learning the Malay language in the private higher institution (PIHL) in Sarawak, Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences. 9 (4) : 573-585.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook .London: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Miyazoe, T.& Anderson, T. (2010) Learning outcomes and students’ perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System. 38:199.
Motallebzadeh, K. & Amirabadi, S. (2011). Online interactional feedback in second language writing: through peer or tutor?. MJAL 3:2
Ng, S.F. (2009). Learner autonomy and some selected correlates among adult distance learners in malaysia. Unpublished PhD thesis. Univ. Putra Malaysia.Kuala Lumpur.
Noor Hanim Rahmat. (2000). Revising composition with and without peer feedback- A case study of ESL writers in a smart school. Unpublished Master, Universiti Malaya. Kuala Lumpur.
Shamsad, B. O. (2003). Student response to expert feedback on multiple draft compositions. Unpublished Master thesis, International Islamic Univ., Gombak, Kuala Lumpur
Spratt, M. Humphreys & Chan, V. (2002). Autonomy and motivation: which comes first? Language Teaching Research. 6 : 245-266.
Taylor, M., King, J. & Pinsent-Johnson, C. (2002) . Understanding the zone of proximal development in adult literacy learning. Proceedings of 21st Annual Conference Canadian Association for the Study of Adult Education (CASAE). Toronto. May 30 - June 1.
Tengku Sarina Aini bt Tengku Kassim (2012). Teaching and learning experiences in Malaysian higher education. A case study of a teacher education programme. Unpublished PhD thesis. Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand.
Thang, S.M. (2009). Investigating autonomy of Malaysian ESL learners: A comparison between public and private universities. 3L Language, Linguistics and Literature. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 15 : 97-124.
Thang, S.M. and Azarina, A. (2007). Investigating readiness for autonomy:
A comparison of Malaysian ESL undergraduates of three public universities. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 6 (1) : 1-18.
Thang, S.M. (2005). Promoting learner autonomy among Malaysian ESL distance learners: The why and the how. In Lee Su Kim, Thang Siew Ming, Lee King Siong & Hafriza Buranudeen (Eds.), Papers in Language Studies and Linguistics: A Malaysian Perspective. Bangi, Selangor: Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, UKM.
Thang, S.M. (2001). Malaysian learners’ conceptions of their learning
processes and their perceptions of their English as a Second Language courses in a tertiary distance learning context. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
Tuzi, F.(2001). E-feedback's impact on ESL writers' revisions. Proceedings of The Annual Meeting of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL). St. Louis, MO. February 27-March 3.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind-in society- The development of higher psychological processes. UK: Harvard Univ. Press.
Wachob, P. (2006). Methods and materials for motivation and learner autonomy. Reflections on English Language Teaching. 51: 93-122.
Xie, Y., Ke F.F. & Sharma, P. (2007). The effect of peer feedback from blogging on college students’ reflective learning processes. Internet and Higher Education. 11 : 18-25.
Yang, Y.F. (2010). Students’ reflection on online self-correction and peer review to improve writing. Computers & Education. 55: 1202–1210
Yu, F.Y. & Wu, C.P. (2013). Predictive effects of online peer feedback types on performance quality. Educational Technology & Society. 16 (1) : 332–341
Abdullah, R., & Mohamed, A. R. (2015). Enhancing Learner Autonomy Abilities in Writing via WAPF. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(11). 97-116.
Copyright: © 2015 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
