The broad objective of this study is to determine whether triple bottom line reports has been able to deliver stakeholders with the needed satisfaction when compared to conventional financial reports. To achieve the above objective three research questions were raised, to address the issue of triple bottom line report and stakeholder satisfaction. From these hypotheses were formulated. The descriptive method of research design was employed to generate the required data. The population of were made up of three distinctive groups: Investors’, Customers’ and Accountants. The primary data were summarized using tables and the formulated hypotheses analyzed using one-sample z test procedure done with the aid of SPSS version 20. Our findings indicated that Investors' have no confidence in the use of triple bottom line report as a basis for choice of investment decision; while, Customers on the other hand do not rely on the use of triple bottom line report as a medium for assessing organizations' impact on the society. Accountants' were negative on the level of rigour and transparency exerted in the preparation of triple bottom line report. Based on this, it was recommended that companies should disclose more quantifiable triple bottom line indicators encompassing social, environmental and economic performance indicators. The development of standards to guide companies in the identification of variables for disclosure is also suggested.
AI, M. O. S. (2011). Stakeholder Management, Triple Bottom Line and Sustainability Report: Their Relevance to Sustainable Business Competitiveness & Economic Sustainability in the Asia Pacific. Retrieved from http://www.feb.unimas.my/images/febwp/wps1103.pdf
Arroyo, P. (2008). The Three Dimensions of a Sustainable management Accounting System. ASAC (Vol. 29).
Ballou, B., Heitger, D.L. & Landes, C.E. (2006). The Future of Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Accountancy, Available at http://referensi.dosen.narotama.ac.id/files/2012/01/The-Future-of-Corporate-Sustainability.pdf
Bennett, M. and James, P. (1998). The green bottom line: Management accounting for environmental improvement and business benefit. Management Accounting, 76(10), pp. 20-28.
Carrol, A., & Bucholtz, A. K. (2006). Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. South western Publishing: Thompson.
Cheng, L. H., & Fan, H. K. (2010). Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, pp. 435-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0476-3
Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-118.
Collier, P. M. (2008). Stakeholder accountability: a field study of the implementation of a governance improvement plan. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(7), pp. 933-953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513570810907429
Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90001-8
Crowther, D. (2000). Social and Environmental Accounting. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Deegan, C. (2001). Financial Accounting Theory. Roseville, NSW: McGraw-Hill Book Company Australia Pty Limited.
Diegling, P. Anderson, J. & Guthrie, J. (1996). Accounting for public accounts committees. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, (9)2, 30-49.
Donaldson, T, & Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.
Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. British Columbia: New Society Publishers.
Faux, J. (2004). A Theoretical Perspective of Triple Bottom Line Reporting and Issues of Performance and Disclosure in the Australian Tourism and Hospitality Industry, Business Enterprises and Sustainable Travel (BEST) Think Tank IV, Sustainability and Mass Destinations: Challenges and Possibilities, Conference Proceedings, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Faux, J. (2002). Users of environmental financial information and aspects of company reporting. Interdisciplinary Environmental Review - Anthology, (4)2, 89-98.
Fauzi, H., Svensson, G., & Rahman, A. A. (2010). “Triple Bottom Line” as “Sustainable Corporate Performance”: A Proposition for the Future. Sustainability, 2(5), 1345–1360. doi:10.3390/su2051345
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. USA: Pitman Publishing Inc.
Freeman, R. E. & William, E. (1990). Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Interpretation. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(4).
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J.E., & Wick, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: survival, reputation and success. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gray, R., Owen, D. and Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and Accountability, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Graff R. G., Reiskin E. D., White A. L. & Bidwell K. (1998). Snapshots of environmental cost accounting: A report to US Environmental Protection Agency. US EPA Environmental Accounting Project, Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/acctg/
Gupta, V.K. (2011). Environmental Accounting and Reporting – An Analysis of Indian Corporate Sector, Available at http://www.wbiconpro.com/110-Gupta.pdf
Henderson, S., & Peirson, G. (2004). Issues in Financial Accounting. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.
Higgins, C. (2001). Triple bottom line reporting: the importance of consistency. paper presented to Governance and social responsibility in the new millenium, Deakin University, Burwood. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.200.4173&rep=rep1&type=pdf
IFAC (2005). Environmental Management Accounting, International Federation of Accountants, New York. 30
Jasch, C. & Stasiskiene, Z. (2005). From Environmental management Accounting to Sustainability management Accounting. Environmental research, engineering and management, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 77 – 88.
Kolk, A. (2005). Sustainability reporting. VBA journaal, 21(3), 34–42.
Lepineux, F. (2004). Stakeholder Theory, Society and Social Cohesion. Centre for the Management of Environmental and Social Responsibilities (CMER) – INSEAD, Working Paper Series, pp. 1 – 20.
Mark-Herbert, C., Rotter, J., & Pakseresht, A. (2010). A triple bottom line to ensure Corporate Responsibility. Retrieved 15th January 2013 from http://cemusstudent.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Corporate-perspectives-on-CR-Timeless-Cityland-withreference-2011+.pdf
Nasi, J., Nasi, S., Philip, N., & Zylidopoulos, S. (1997). The evolution of corporate social responsiveness- an exploratory study of Finnish and Canadian forestry companies. Business & Society, 38(3), pp. 296-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.427
Okafor, G.O., Okaro, S.C., & Egbunike, F.C. (2013). Environmental Cost Accounting and Cost Allocation (a Study of Selected Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria). European Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 5, No. 18, pp. 68 – 75.
Osisioma, B.C. (2010). Global Financial Crisis: Impact on the Changing Face of Accountancy Profession. Frontier Lecture Series 001, Department of Accountancy, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka.
Perrini, F., & Tencati, A. (2006). Sustainability and stakeholder management: the need for new corporate performance evaluation and reporting systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(5), 296–308. doi:10.1002/bse.538
Post, J.E., Preston, L.E., Sachs S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: the new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45(1): 6–28.
Ratanajongkol, S., Davey, H., & Low, M. (2006). Corporate social reporting in Thailand, the news is all good and increasing. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 3(1), pp. 67-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/11766090610659751
Suttipun, M. (2012). Triple Bottom Line Reporting in Annual Reports: A Case Study of Companies Listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET). Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 4(1). doi:10.5296/ajfa.v4i1.1289
U.S. EPA. (1995a). Environmental Accounting Case Studies: Green Accounting at AT&T
U.S EPA. (1995b:9). An Introduction to Environmental Accounting as a Business Management Tool: Key Concepts and Terms, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, June. Retrieved in October 2013 from http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/acctg/resources.htm
Value of sustainability reporting: A study by Ernst & Young LLP and the Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship, (2013).
Wisner, P. S., Epstein, M. J., Bagozzi, R. P., & Martin Freedman and Bikki, J. (2006). Organizational Antecedents and Consequences of Environmental Performance. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 3, pp. 143-167.
Zadek, S. (1998). Balancing performance, ethics, and accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(13), pp. 1241-1441.
Zadek, S., Pruzan, P., and Evans, R. (1997). Building corporate accountability: Emerging practices in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Earthscan: London
Ogbodo, O. C. (2015). A Stakeholder Approach to Triple Bottom Line Accounting: Nigerian Experience. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(6). 127-131.
Copyright: © 2015 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
