Iran has transformed after the second world war due to volume, speed and diversity of contextual and physical changes, structure and historical function of city. The evolutions of the past half century caused the city of Tehran to have two different urban spaces which are called in the present paper as traditional and modern communities . The residential section of old neighborhoods of the city of Tehran( like traditional fabric of Kashanak neighborhood ) is usually very dense, without considerable open space while having a very homogenous and coherent face. Settlement of all these components along the bypasses and winding roads created a system with historical identity in which a part of the lost past of Tehran can be found. The present research is conducted to study social capital in Kashanak neighborhood of the city of Tehran . social capital is intangible, and cannot be seen or touched. Hence it can only be measured by reference to those features of society with which its development is associated, i.e. the process which results in its accumulation. There is general agreement that this process includes features of society such as association (both formal-via group membership and work colleagues, and informal-via networks of friends , neighbours and family), engagement in community-based activities , community cohesiveness and thick and thin trust. These features of society may be considered the building blocks of social capital and used as proxies for its measurement. Bonding social capital refers to the social capital generated and shared by members of a relatively homogenous group. Bridging social capital refers to the social capital generated and shared through interconnections between heterogeneous groups. The concepts of bonding and bridging social capital contain elements of norms of behaviour and societal structures in that they indicate both a tendency for people to act in a certain manner (the norm of tending toward bonding or bridging links) and the capacity to do so (the fact of having friends or contacts either locally-bonding link,or externally-bridging links). The level and nature of social capital in each town was assessed through a self- completion questionnaire. A Hundred persons of each community were selected randomly for collection of data. The questionnaire included 22 variables designed to measure aspects of social capital formation covering informal association, formal association, social cohesiveness and engagement , trust, Bridging Social Capital and Bonding Social Capital. Comparative scores for both communities on each of the six factors were generated by calculating a score for individual cases based their responses to the variables included in each factor and then aggregating these scores for cases in each community . Multivariate variance analysis method has been used to compare the two communities. A self-completion questionnaire was designed in which we included questions that had been used to measure social capital in traditional and modern communities.We also grouped questions in factors similar .Responses to the questionnaire were assessed via measurement on a ?ve-point Likert scale . The research hypothesis states that social capital in traditional community indicates a higher level of modern community . Questions were included to reflect perceptions on informal association , formal association, cohesiveness and engagement, social trust, Bonding Social Capital, and Bridging Social Capital. Responses to questions were rated on ordinal scales and recoded where necessary so that a higher score represented a higher level of social capital . A calculation of general social capital (GSC) to reflect the total level of social capital in each community was made simply by aggregating the scores of individual cases on each factor. The difference between the communities statistically significant in relation to informal association with friends ad neighbours and differences between the two community in regard to formal association, social cohesiveness and engagement are noteworthy. Although it is approved in the present research that the level of general social capital (GSC) is higher in traditional community, the score obtained in bridging social capital factor is higher in modern community.bridging social capital represents the propensity of individuals to travel and have social relations with people who do not live in the local community and is an indication of the degree to which local residents network with others beyond their community.the importance of bridging social capital to facilitate development, commenting that ‘the commitment of non-local actors through financial and organisational assistance is needed to stimulate cooperation between local subjects’. Therefore, the higher level of extera-neighborhood (widespread ) relations in modern community, due to better situation of bridging social capital, paved the way for its development.
? Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: Richardson, J.G. (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood, Westport, pp. 241–258.
? Chamlee-W. E. (2008). The structure of social capital: An Austrian perspective on its nature and development. Review of Political Economy 20, 41–58.
? Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
? Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human-capital. American Journal of Sociology 94, S95–S120.
? Dalir, K. H. (2006). Regional planning, SAMT Press, 69.
? Durkin, J. T. (2000). Measuring Social Capital and its Economic Impact. University of Chicago, Working Paper.
? Durlauf, S. ( 2002).On theempirics of social capital.Economic Journal 112, F459–F479.
? Glaeser, E.L., Laibson, D.I., Scheinkman, J.A., Soutter, C.L.(2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 811–846.
? Krishna, A., Shrader, E. (1999). Social Capital Assessment Tool.Paper prepared for the Conference on Social Capital and Poverty Reduction, The World Bank, Washington, DC, June 22–24, 1999.
? Mohan, G., Mohan, J. (2002). Placing social capital. Progress in Human Geography 26 (2), 191–210.
? Mojtahedzadeh, G. (2008), Urban planning in Iran, University of Payamnoor, 123.
? Nazarian, A., (2010), Dynamics of Iran’s Urban System, Mobtakeran Press, 120.
? Nazarian, A. (2008). Urban geography of Iran, University of Payamnoor, 31.
? Onyx, J., Bullen, P. ( 2000).Sources of social capital. In: Winter, I.(Ed.), Social Capital and Public Policy in Australia. Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, pp. 105–135.
? Paldam,M. (2000). Social capital: one or many? Definition and measurement. Journal of Economic Surveys 14, 629–653.
? Putnam, R.D. ( 2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York.
? Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
? Robison, L.J., Schmid, A.A., Siles, M.E. (2002). Is social capital really capital? Review of Social Economy 60, 1–21.
? Schmid, A.A. (2003). Discussion: social capital as an important lever in economic development policy and private strategy. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85, 716–719.
? Saidi, A. (2010). Encyclopedia of Urban and Rural Management, Iran Municipalities and Rural Management Organization, 189.
? Sarrafi, M.(2000). Foundation of Regional Development Planning, Plan and Budget Organization, 26.
? Shakoei, H. ( 2007). New perspectives in urban geography, SAMT Press, 184.
? Shieh, E. (2006). Introduction to urban planning, University of Science and Industry, 11.
? Stone, W. (2001). Measuring social capital: towards a theoretically informed measurement framework for researching social capital in family and community life. Research Paper No.24, Australian Institute of Family Studies.
? Trigilia, C. ( 2001). Social capital and local development. European Journal of Social Theory 4 (4), 427–442.
? Tymon, W.G., Stumpf, S.A.( 2002).Social capital in the success of knowledge workers. Career Development International 8 (1), 12–20.
? Wallis, J., Killerby, P., Dollery, B.( 2004). Social economics and social capital. International Journal of Social Economics 31, 239–258.
? Western, J., Stimson, R., Mullins, P., Memmott, P., Baum, S., Johnston, J., Van Gellecum, Y., (2002). Assessing Community Strength: Report Prepared for the Department of Family and Community Services. University of Queensland, Social and Economic Research Centre in Association with the Aboriginal Environments Research Centre, Brisbane.
? Winter, I. (2000). Towards a theorized understanding of family life and social capital: Australian Institute of Family Studies Working Paper No. 21.
? Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development towards a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society 27 (2), 151–208.
? Ziari, K. (2007). New towns planning, SAMT Press, 50.
? Ziari, K. (2006). Principles & Methods of Regional Planning, University of Yazd, 233.
? Ziari, K. (2008). Urban Land Use Planning, University of Yazd, 13.
Mohammadi, S. J., & Kooshki, F. (2015). Tehran City and Social Capital Dualism: A Neighborhood Case Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(5). 270-280.
Copyright: © 2015 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
