Purpose: To obtain the views and recommendations of Management students of MS & MBA programs of Abasyn University, Peshawar about various aspects of the current managerial education learning methods/styles.
Study Design: Cross-sectional survey design is adopted.
Place and Duration of Study: Abasyn University, Peshawar in October and November 2014.
Methodology: Preformed close ended structured questionnaire regarding managerial teaching and evaluation methods and recommendations was used to collect the data from students of MS & MBA (n=170) at Abasyn university, Peshawar. SPSS (21) program was used for analysis. Data was presented as a frequency percentage.
Findings: A majority of the students (81%) thought that multimedia was the most effective teaching tool, (58%) students viewed 45 minutes as ideal lecture duration. Measures suggested that young teachers/Lecturers (89%) convey lectures better than senior teachers to students & domestic languages (55%) are better mode of conveying lectures to students. Student (87%) preferred Practical field work as a tool of evaluation.
Conclusion: Managerial students in this study preferred Junior/young teachers, multimedia, Domestic/national Language to understand the lecture, lecture duration less than 60 minutes and Presentations as their preferred mode of evaluation. Students recommended increased emphasis on better lectures, increasing learning motivation in students and more hands on practical field work to improve current managerial education system.
Dunn,R & Griggs, S.(2003).Synthesis of the Dunn and Dunn Learning Style
Model Research: Who, What, When, Where, and What? New York: St.Jhon’s University Press.
Dunn, R.(2000).Learning styles: Theory,research, and practice. National Forum
of Applied Educational Research Journal, 13(1),3-22.
Suhaib Haider Naqvi,Fizza Mobasher,Muhammad Abdul Rehman Afzal,Muhammad
Umair, Arooj Naeem Kohli.(2010). Effectiveness of teaching methods in a medical institute: perceptions of medical students to teaching aids.
Alkhasaweh,I. M., Mrayyan, M. T., Docherty,C, Alashram, S., & Yosef, H. (2008).
Problem based learning (PBL): Assessing students’ learning preferences using VARK..Nurse Education Today, 28,572-579.
Felder, R.M., & Silverman, L.K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering
education [Electronic Version]. Engr. Education, 78(7), 674-681. Retrieved on March 27th, 2012.
Keefe J.(1987).Learning style: theory and practice. Reston: National Association of
Secondary School Principals;
Seth V, Upadhyaya P, Ahmad M, Moghe V.( 2010) . Power point or chalk and talk:
perceptions of medical students versus dental students in a medical college in India. Adv Med Edu Pract (1: 11-16. Anderson R. Beyond Powerpoint: building a new classroom presenter. Syllabus 2004; 17:31-3.
Yvonne Steinert, (2004). Student perceptions of effective small group teaching.
Tom Drummond, (2005). A Brief Summary of the Best Practice in College Teaching.
Domino, G.(1970). Interactive effects of achievement orientation and teaching
style on academic achivement.ACT Research Report, 39, 1-8.
Bandler, R, Grinder , J, & O’Stevens, J. (1981) Frogs into princes:
Neurolinguistic programming. Real People Press.
Armstrong, S. & Mahmud,A. (2008). Experiential Learning and the Acquisition
Managerial Tacit Knowledge. Academy of Management Journal, 7(2), pp. 190 - 208.
Cafferty,E. (1980). An analysis of student performance based upon the degree
of match between the educational cognitive style of the teachers and the educational cognitive style of the students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska.
Yousaf ,A., Hashim. M.( 2010). “A Case study of Annual and Semester Systems
of Examination on Government College of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan”, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences , Volume. 2, Issue. 9, pp-53-73.
Kazmi, S. S. A., & Hashim, M. (2015). Learning Methods Preferred by Management Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(3). 112-121.
Copyright: © 2015 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode