This article investigates cross-contamination management in halal logistics by bridging classical al-Sh?fi??’s fiqh discourse with contemporary Malaysian halal standards to provide a coherent analytical framework. Specific attention is given to wet, moist, and liquid conditions, which significantly increase the likelihood and severity of impurity transfer in supply chain operations. Drawing from authoritative Syafi‘i texts from the rulings on a dead mouse in ghee, to the seven-wash requirement for canine-related impurities, and the jurisprudential distinction between solid and liquid substances, the study demonstrates how classical legal reasoning provides a coherent conceptual framework for understanding impurity dynamics. These doctrinal insights are then aligned with regulatory provisions in MS 1500 and the MS 2400 series, which mandate segregation, environmental control, specialised sanitation, and risk-based handling procedures. By integrating fiqh principles with contemporary logistical practices, this article illustrates how traditional jurisprudence continues to offer practical relevance in addressing the modern logistics operational challenges. The analysis ultimately argues that combining classical frameworks with regulatory standards strengthens halal governance, enhances consistency in contamination control, and provides a robust, evidence-aligned foundation for safeguarding halal integrity across increasingly complex supply chains. This synthesis reinforces the enduring utility of Syafi‘i thought in shaping an effective and comprehensive halal logistics management system.
Ali, M., & Khan, M. (2021). Feedback as a driver of student engagement in ESL critical reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 33(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/21504857.2021.1867219
Alzahrani, H., & Khan, A. (2020). Self-regulated learning and its impact on student engagement in ESL reading. TESOL Journal, 11(4), e4284. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.4284
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303
Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their implications for reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 452–477. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.34.4.4
British Educational Research Association (BERA). (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
Chik, P. (2013). Motivation and engagement in ESL reading: Exploring the links. Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, 21(2), 1–18.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., & Huang, J. (2004). Predicting reading comprehension and text engagement in elementary and middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.3
Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192
Herlinawati, H., Marwa, M., Ismail, N., Junaidi, J., Liza, L. O., & Situmorang, D. D. B. (2024). The integration of 21st century skills in the curriculum of education. Heliyon, 10(5), e29789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29789
Hockly, N. (2018). Digital literacies in ESL classrooms: Enhancing engagement through technology. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 887–910. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.434
Ibrahim, M., & Tan, C. S. (2021). The effect of culturally relevant texts on student engagement in ESL reading. Language and Culture in Education, 35(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.204
Ismail, N., Soo, K. Y., & Ismail, N. (2018). Reexamining academic reading skills of unemployed graduates through the English Language E Training (ELET) Module. Insight Journal (IJ), 1(1), 11–22.
Ismail, N. (2022). Reexamining academic reading skills of unemployed graduates through the English Language E-Training (ELET) module. Insight Journal (IJ), 1(1), 11–22. ISSN 2600-8564.
Ismail, N., Mohd Ariff Albakri, I. S., Soo, K. Y., Elias@Alias, S., Ratan Singh, D. S., Abu, R., & Wan Mohd, W. N. H. (2024). A case study on the use of Dynamic E-IAW program module for learning ESL writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i5/20850
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2017). Cooperative learning in ESL contexts. Journal of Second Language Teaching, 23(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194233X.2017.1337227
Kim, S., & Kim, M. (2020). The role of peer feedback in enhancing ESL student engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1725975
Lee, C., & Lee, S. (2021). The impact of teacher feedback on student engagement in ESL reading and writing. TESOL Quarterly, 55(1), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.549
Lee, J. (2015). Teacher support, student engagement, and academic achievement in ESL classrooms. International Journal of Language Teaching, 35(3), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600734.2015.1017682
Liu, S., & Fisher, D. (2017). Cultural influences on student engagement in ESL classrooms. Language and Intercultural Communication, 17(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2017.1317754
Namsaeng, P., & Sukying, A. (2021). The effect of group reading strategy on critical thinking skills in Thai EFL university learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.2.4
Pan, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020). The impact of gamification on student engagement in ESL reading classrooms. Computers & Education, 149, 103805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103805
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Rauf, M. A., & Aziz, M. S. (2022). The role of interactive reading strategies in enhancing student engagement in ESL classes. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jerp.2022.02.006
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233
Tüürben, T. (2019). The effect of self-regulation based strategic reading education on comprehension, motivation, and self-regulation skills. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(4), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.203.3
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yang, Y.-D., Zhou, C.-L., & Wang, Z.-Q. (2024). The relationship between self-control and learning engagement among Chinese college students: The chain mediating roles of resilience and positive emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1331691. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1331691
Yeh, H.-C., Hung, H.-T., & Chiang, Y.-H. (2017). The use of online annotations in reading instruction and its impact on students’ reading progress and processes. ReCALL, 29(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000021
Zhang, W., & Wang, X. (2020). Exploring the role of mobile-assisted language learning in enhancing student engagement in ESL reading. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lltl.2020.05.004
Zhang, Y., & Li, X. (2021). Task-based language teaching and student engagement in ESL reading. Language Teaching Research, 25(3),
Ismail, N., Elias@Alias, S., Abu, R., Kassim, F. M., Zamani, N. F. M., & Razlan, Z. (2026). An Exploration of the Four Dimensions of Student Engagement among Business Studies Students in a Tertiary-Level ESL Critical Reading Class. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(1), 44–62.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
