This article analyses the role of ‘urf (custom) as a pivotal instrument in the reform of Islamic legal rulings, particularly within the framework of contemporary fiqh and the consolidation of the Fiqh Sabahi discourse. Grounded in the methodology of usul al-fiqh, the study develops a conceptual framework of ‘urf encompassing its definitions, classifications, and criteria for admissibility as recognised by Islamic legal scholarship. The research further explores how ‘urf contributes to the formation of man?t al-?ukm (effective legal causes), influencing legal change in response to evolving societal realities and local contexts. The article also examines the intersection between ‘urf and fiqh al-w?qi? (contextual jurisprudence), illustrating this through critical analyses of selected contemporary legal issues pertinent to Sabah’s multicultural society. These include the usage of the term "astaga", halal food determination based on local taste (istit?bah al-ma?alliyyah), Friday prayers with fewer than 40 congregants, the indigenous practice of sogit (customary compensation), the distribution of sacrificial meat to non-Muslims, and the management of non-Muslim deceased by Muslim relatives. The study finds that recognising valid ‘urf ?a??? in alignment with the objectives of Islamic law (maq??id al-shar??ah) can enhance context-sensitive legal formulations that are both relevant and responsive to local needs. It advocates for a broader integration of ‘urf-based ijtih?d within fatwa institutions and Islamic legal systems, provided that such customs do not contradict definitive textual sources and serve the public interest (masla?ah). In conclusion, ‘urf is affirmed as a critical element in Islamic legal renewal, harmonising the authority of scriptural texts with the dynamic realities of contemporary society.
Aminudin Basir @ Ahmad, & Mamat, A. (2012). Dakwah kepada masyarakat bukan Islam menerusi interaksi. Jurnal Islam dan Masyarakat Kontemporari, 5.
Al-Jurjaniy, A. ibn M. (1983). Kitab al-Ta?rifat. Dar al-Kutub al-?Ilmiyyah.
Al-Mawardi, A. bin M. bin H. (1994). Al-Hawi al-Kabir. Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Qarafi, S. A. bin I. (1994). Al-Zakhirah. Dar al-Gharb al-Islami.
Al-Shirazi. (n.d.). Kitab al-Majmu?. Dar Ihya? al-Thuras al-?Arabi.
Al-Syatibi, I. bin M. (2003). Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Syariah. Dar al-Kutub al-?Ilmiyyah.
e-SMAF. (2017a). Hukum solat Jumaat yang kurang jemaahnya 40 orang. Retrieved from http://e-smaf.islam.gov.my/e-smaf/index.php/main/mainv1/fatwa/pr/15845
Hilmi, A. M. M. (2019). Faktor ?urf dalam pembaharuan hukum syara? berkaitan isu-isu muamalah. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Research, 2(1).
Hilmi, A. M. M., Ibrahim, M. R., Abdullah, M. I., & Ahmad, K. A. (2021). Resensi hukum syarak terhadap status harta syubhah menurut ulama Shafi?iyyah. Al-Basirah, 11(2), 21–29.
Khallaf, A. W. (1978). ?Ilm al-Usul al-Fiqh. Dar al-Qalam.
Naim, A. M. (2016, September). Memahami kerangka Maqasid al-Syariah dalam kewangan dan pelaburan [Paper presentation]. Seminar “Pasaran Modal Islam Malaysia 2016”, Institut Kefahaman Islam Malaysia (IKIM).
Putri, D. (2020). Konsep ?urf sebagai sumber hukum dalam Islam. eL-Mashlahah, 10(2).
Tamring, B. A. M., & Mahali, S. N. H. (2020). Toleransi etnik dalam kalangan pelajar Bumiputera sekolah menengah di Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. E-Proceeding of the International Conference on Education, Social Sciences & Technology.
Wahyuni, A., & Harisah. (2023). Konsep al-?urf dalam perkembangan Society 5.0: Perspektif fikih kontemporer. Ulumuna: Jurnal Studi Keislaman.
Zaidan, A. K. (1998). Al-Wajiz fi Usul al-Fiqh. Mu’assasah al-Risalah.
Marinsah, S. A., Hajimin, M. N. H. H., Rasip, Z. M., Hamzah, A. H., & Saari, N. F. Z. (2025). The Instrument of ‘Urf in the Reform of Islamic Legal Rulings: An Analytical Study on Contemporary Fiqh. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(10), 761–772.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
