Critical Classification and Utilization of Israiliyyat Narratives in Tafsir al-Jamal: Perspectives of Classical Scholars

This study critically analyzes Israiliyyat narratives in Tafsir al-Jamal by examining the methodological classification and scholarly perspectives articulated by classical authorities, notably Ibn Kathir and al-Nawawi. The research highlights that Israiliyyat can be categorized into three main groups: those accepted by Qur’anic or authentic Prophetic standards, those rejected due to contradiction with Islamic sources, and those whose authenticity remains indeterminate. Al-Nawawi’s approach permits the contextual use of weak hadith and non-authenticated reports for moral exhortation and historical illustration, provided they are not fabricated. The study emphasizes the need for critical evaluation and clear differentiation between Israiliyyat and divine revelation, especially in Southeast Asian educational environments where narrative appeal is strong. By adopting nuanced assessment criteria, Israiliyyat narratives can enrich teaching and understanding, while safeguarding against theological confusion and misinterpretation of legal principles.