The swift integration of eLearning platforms in Malaysian higher learning institutions (HLIs) highlights the crucial role of user interface design (UID) in ensuring academic lecturers' adoption, engagement, and usability. Although the implementation has been widespread in Malaysia, findings show that many eLearning platforms display inconsistent layouts, unintuitive navigation, and limited accessibility. This results in low satisfaction among academic lecturers and underutilization of available features. Based on a mixed-method research approach that included direct observations, survey questionnaires (n = 200), and semi-structured interviews with academic lecturers from selected private HLIs, this study proposes UID guidelines for eLearning platforms in Malaysia’s HLIs. The proposed guidelines were established based on the ADDIE model and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, which both models aim to integrate pedagogical alignment with practical usability. Results from the findings show recurring issues, including excessive textual content, unclear flow of information, unorganized navigation, and limited integration of interactive functions. The proposed UID guidelines comprise main features such as clarity and readability, intuitive navigation, accessibility, interactive engagement, functional efficiency, consistency, and adaptability to local contexts. Therefore, by addressing these identified design shortcomings, the proposed framework enhances academic lecturers’ interaction with eLearning platforms, supports more effective teaching and learning practices, and encourages better engagement. Furthermore, this study contributes to Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG4) on Quality Education, which supports inclusive, user-centered digital learning environments that facilitate equal access and foster lifelong learning opportunities. With implications for design practices, policy development, and future technological adoption strategies in higher education, the study offers a context-specific and research-informed basis for enhancing eLearning platform interfaces in Malaysian HLIs.
Abid, M., Aljabri, M., Ashraf, M. A., Naseer, A., & Saba, T. (2024). An evaluation framework and comparative analysis of the widely used learning management systems. PLOS ONE, 19(3), e0311111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311111
Baragash, R. S., Al-Samarraie, H., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alfarraj, O. (2022). Students’ Perceptions of E-Learning in Malaysian Universities: Sentiment Analysis Based Machine Learning Approach. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 21, 439–463. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/5024
Bujang, S. D. A., Selamat, A., Krejcar, O., Marešová, P., & Nguyên, N. T. (2020). Digital Learning Demand for future Education 4.0—Case Studies at Malaysia education Institutions. Informatics (Basel), 7(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7020013
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). Sage.
Faudzi, F. M., Saad, S., & Ali, M. (2023). Investigating the User Interface Design Frameworks of Current Mobile Learning Applications: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 13(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010094
Gavrus, C., Petre, I. M., & Lup?a-T?taru, D. A. (2025). eLearning platforms and their contribution to sustainable education in higher education: An international perspective. Sustainability, 17(7), 3032. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073032
Hasan, N. H. (2023). Examining user experience of Moodle e-learning system: Digitalization of e-learning in Malaysia post–COVID-19. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/111789183/Examining_User_Experience_of_Moodle_e_Learning_System
Korsah, D. P. (2024). Adoption and Utilization of Moodle Learning Management System for Emergency Remote Teaching: A UTAUT Perspective. Educational Point, 1(2), e111. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/15730
Maluleke, R. (2024). Usage of Blackboard Learn for Teaching and Learning in the Historically Disadvantaged Institution: Challenges and prospects. South African Journal of Higher Education, 38(5), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.20853/38-5-6409
McDonald, J. K. (2023). The everydayness of instructional design and the pursuit of quality in online courses. Online Learning, 27(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3470
Miya, T. K., & Govender, I. (2022). UX/UI design of online learning platforms and their impact on learning: A review. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(10), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.2236
Miya, T. K., & Govender, I. (2022). UX/UI design of online learning platforms and their impact on learning: A review. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(10), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i10.2236
Moonsamy, D., & Govender, I. (2018). Use of Blackboard learning management system: An empirical study of staff behaviour at a South African university. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 3069–3082. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91623
Mujalli, T., Alshraideh, M., Al-Gasaymeh, A., & Jwaifell, M. (2022). Factors influencing instructors’ acceptance and use of e-learning systems in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(11), 15423–15445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11234-8
Mujalli, A., Khan, T., & Almgrashi, A. (2022). University Accounting Students and Faculty Members Using the Blackboard Platform during COVID-19; Proposed Modification of the UTAUT Model and an Empirical Study. Sustainability, 14(4), 2360. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042360
Okocha, S. N., & Odinko, M. N. (2021). E-Learning Facilities Availability, Usability and Adaptability as Predictors of Job Effectiveness among Academic Staff of University of Ibadan. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 25(2), 93109. https://doi.org/10.26522/jiste.v25i2.3671
Rahman, S. F. A., & Ahmad, N. (2025). Computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety: The effects on technology acceptance in implementing flipped learning approach. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(3), 4457–4469. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90300356
Ramli, R. Z., Ramli, A. H., Osman, N., Ismail, Z., Musa, M., & Satari, H. (2020). Online Learning: Insight into Malaysia University Lecturers’ Perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(2), 1250-1258. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i2/9201
Santiadi, A., Hidayat, M. F., & Pratiwi, D. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Moodle and Google Classroom with Technology Acceptance Model. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Pendidikan, 8(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.21460/jutei.2024.81.288
Senevirathne, P., & Manathunga, D. (2021). Impact of e-learning system user interface design on user satisfaction. 2021 2nd International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET), 1–6. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/INCET51464.2021.9641570
Toh, T. L., Ng, K. T., & Phoon, H. Y. (2023). Academics’ acceptance of digital technologies in Malaysian higher education: Insights from UTAUT2. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.8
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428
Yeop, M. A., Yaakob, M. F. M., Wong, K. T., Don, Y., & Zain, F. M. (2019). Implementation of ICT policy (blended learning approach): Investigating factors of behavioural intention and use behaviour. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 767–782. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12149a
Zheng, H., Han, F., Huang, Y., Wu, Y., & Wu, X. (2025). Factors influencing behavioral intention to use e-learning in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A meta-analytic review based on the UTAUT2 model. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 12015–12053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13299-2
Yusoff, N. H. M., & Azahari, M. H. (2025). A Contextual Framework for User Interface Design in eLearning Platforms: Guidelines for Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(9), 401–412.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
