The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) writing tools as catalysts of language development has revolutionised the domain of Second Language (L2) writing instruction. These advanced technologies, such as ChatGPT and QuillBot, promote writing growth by providing immediate feedback, creative support, and specific improvement recommendations, allowing L2 students to enhance their writing skills more efficiently. The importance of these catalytic tools has increased significantly in educational settings, notably aiding L2 learners who face difficulties in writing development. This quantitative study analysed L2 students' experiences with AI writing tools and assessed their transformative impact on academic writing advancement. The study employed a comprehensive questionnaire-based methodology to examine students' interaction patterns with AI technologies and their reported effects on writing growth. The study especially investigated how these tools facilitated advancements in essential writing skills, encompassing vocabulary expansion, syntactic development, rhetorical organisation, and stylistic refinement. The thorough examination of L2 student experiences demonstrated that AI tools enhanced creative expression, refined writing style, and maintained engagement in the writing process. The findings indicated that AI writing tools acted as excellent catalysts for L2 writing development, especially in skill progression, quality improvement, and writing efficiency. The tailored feedback and structured assistance offered by these technologies greatly enhanced L2 students' writing confidence and proficiency. This study emphasises the pivotal function of AI tools in modern L2 writing education, showcasing their capacity to enhance academic writing proficiency among L2 learners.
Al Mahmud, F. (2023). Investigating EFL students’ writing skills through artificial intelligence: Wordtune application as a tool. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(5), 1395–1404. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1405.28
Chapelle, C. A. (2024). Open generative AI changes a lot, but not everything. Modern Language Journal, 108, 534–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12927
Chong, D. (2021). Research on artificial intelligence-based English writing blended teaching mode. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1852 032018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1852/3/032018
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
El-Garawany, M. S. M (2024). The effects of QuillBot-based intervention on English language majors’ EFL writing performance, apprehension, and self-efficacy. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 43, 167-189. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.43.10
Godwin-Jones, R., O’Neill, E., & Ranali, J. (2024). Integrating AI tools into instructed second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle, G. H. Beckett, & J. Ranalli (Eds.), Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Applied Linguistics (pp. 9-23). https://doi.org/10.31274/isudp.2024.154.02
Hanauer, D. I., Sheridan, C. L., & Englander, K. (2019). Linguistic injustice in the writing of research articles in English as a second language: Data from Taiwanese and Mexican Researchers. Written Communication, 36(1), 136-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318804821
Levin, I., Marom, M., & Kojukhov, A. (2025). Rethinking AI in education: Highlighting the metacognitive challenge. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 16(Suppl. 1), 250–263.
Li, J., & Li, M. (2022). Assessing L2 writing in the digital age: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Second Language Writing, 57, 100913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100913
Li, B., Tan, Y. L., Wang, C., & Lowell, V. (2025). Two years of innovation: A systematic review of empirical generative AI research in language learning and teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100445
Liu, W. (2024). A systematic review of automated writing evaluation feedback: Validity, effects and students’ engagement. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 45, 86–105. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.45.05
Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
Marzuki, S., Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, R., & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2236469.
Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. (2018). Writing task complexity, students’ motivational beliefs, anxiety and their writing production in English as a second https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9887-9
Ramadhan, R.A., Rahim, A., Darmanto, D., & Paris, A.S. (2024). Enhancing Academic Writing through Digital Tools: A Systematic Review. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 4(4), 758-770. https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v4i4.2342
Regmi, P. R., Waithaka, E., Paudyal, A., Simkhada, P., & van Teijlingen, E. (2016). Guide to the design and application of online questionnaire surveys. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology, 6(4), 640-644. https://doi.org/10.3126/nje.v6i4.17258
Selim, A. S. M. (2024). The transformative impact of AI-powered tools on academic writing: Perspectives of EFL university students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 14(1), 14–40. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v14n1p14
Shi, H., Chai, C. S., Zhou, S., & Aubrey, S. (2025). Comparing the effects of ChatGPT and automated writing evaluation on students’ writing and ideal L2 writing self. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2454541
Su, Y., Lin, Y., & Lai, C. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms. Assessing Writing, 57, 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752
Suharto, R. P., Zubaidi, N., Nurdjizah, A. N. P., & Sekarsari, P. (2025). The use of AI-based writing tools (QuillBot and ChatGPT) in developing the writing competence of language learners. ESTEEM Journal of English Education Study Programme, 8(2), 1-25.
Wang, L., Chen, X., Wang, C., Xu, L., Shadiev, R., & Li, Y. (2024). ChatGPT’s capabilities in providing feedback on undergraduate students’ argumentation: A case study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101440
Yan, D., & Zhang, S. (2024). L2 writer engagement with automated written corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT: A mixed-method multiple case study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03543-y
Zhao, X. (2022). Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) technology for English writing: Introducing wordtune as a digital writing assistant for EFL writers. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221094089
Ziar, P. Q. (2023). Impact of AI-based tools on writing skills. Journal of Research in Education (JoRE), 1, 97-112.
Zulfa, S., Dewi, R. S., Hidayat, D. N., Hamid, F., & Defianty, M. (2023). The use of AI and technology tools in developing students’ English academic writing skills. Proceeding International Conference on Education, 47–63. https://jurnalfaktarbiyah.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/proceedings/article/view/1811
Zyoud, M. M., Bsharat, T. R. K., & Dweikat, K. A. (2024). Quantitative research methods: Maximizing benefits, addressing limitations, and advancing methodological frontiers. ISRG Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10939470
Rahim, S. A., & Natalie Ann Gregory. (2025). AI Writing Tools as Catalysts for L2 Writing Development: A Quantitative Investigation of Students’ Experiences. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(9), 350–364.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
