International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

A Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Advertising Design to Engage Generation Z in China

Open access
China’s Generation Z plays a pivotal role in advancing sustainable development, yet their engagement with sustainable consumption remains limited due to symbolic, emotional, and cultural disconnections in existing advertising strategies. This study aims to explore how advertising can more effectively resonate with Chinese Gen Z by synthesising cross-disciplinary insights on symbolic consumption, sustainability communication, and visual engagement. Employing an integrative literature review methodology guided by the RQ-CONSTRUCT framework, the study analysed 63 core publications selected from a pool of over 10,000 sources across English and Chinese databases. The review identified three dominant themes—symbolic value construction, emotional resonance, and digital engagement—that shape Gen Z’s receptiveness to sustainability messages. Based on these themes, the study develops the CGEN-Z SCA Framework, a conceptual model encompassing four dimensions: symbolic representation, emotional connection, digital interaction, and cultural resonance. This framework offers a strategic lens for designing culturally relevant, affectively powerful, and digitally engaging advertising that fosters sustainable behaviours among China’s Generation Z. The study contributes to the literature by bridging symbolic consumption theory and sustainability communication, while providing practical guidance for designers, educators, and policymakers seeking to promote behavioural transformation through visual persuasion.
Andrade, C. (2021). The inconvenient truth about convenience and purposive samples. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(1), 86–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000
Ao, C. (2021). The pluralistic character, causes and subcultural significance of Z-generation consumerism. China Youth Studies, 06, 100–106. https://doi.org/10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2021.0092
Arning, C. (2009). Kitsch, irony, and consumerism: A semiotic analysis of Diesel advertising 2000–2008. Semiotica, 2009(174), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2009.027
Bentley, M., Fien, J., & Neil, C. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Young Australians as agents of change. National Youth Affairs Research Scheme.
Berger, J. A., Ho, B., & Joshi, Y. V. (2011). Identity signaling with social capital: A model of symbolic consumption. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1828848
Bin, K. R. (2018). A study on the sharing between the producer and the audience in the public service advertisement. Brand Design Studies, 16(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.18852/bdak.2018.16.2.147
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
Breninger, B., & Kaltenbacher, T. (2020). Changing perceptions, changing lives – Promoting intercultural competence and ethical creativity through advertising. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.383
Castonguay, J. (2021). Influencers’ disclosures of advertising and responses from youth with varying levels of theory of mind. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2021.1973928
Chekima, B. (2016). Sustainable consumption: The effects of knowledge, cultural values, environmental advertising, and demographics. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 23(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1114043
Cheng, D. (2022). Green guilt report: Sustainable consumption in China. Daxue Consulting. https://daxueconsulting.com/green-guilt-report-sustainable-consumption-in-china/
Childers, C., & Boatwright, B. (2021). Do digital natives recognize digital influence? Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 42(4), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2020.1830893
Cohen, M. J. (2005). Sustainable consumption in national context. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 1(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2005.11907962
Dodds, S. (2021). Enhancing consumer well-being and behavior with spiritual and fantasy advertising. Journal of Advertising, 50(4), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1939203
Dychtwald, Z. (2021). Understanding China’s young consumers. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/06/understanding-chinas-young-consumers
Fischer, D. (2021). Sustainable consumption communication: A review of an emerging field. Journal of Cleaner Production, 300, 126880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126880
Gilbert, J. R. (2021). The dance between darkness and light: A systematic review of advertising’s role in consumer well-being. International Journal of Advertising, 40(4), 491–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1863048
Gyeom, K. J., & Wook, Y. S. (2021). The Generation Z consumers’ recommendation and participation intention. Product Culture Design Research, 67, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.18555/kicpd.2021.67.007
Haider, M., Shannon, R., & Moschis, G. P. (2022). Sustainable consumption research and the role of marketing. Sustainability, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073999
Harms, B. (2017). Digital native advertising: Practitioner perspectives and a research agenda. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 17(2), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2017.1357513
He, S. (2022). The background and characteristics of Generation Z youth. China Youth Studies, 08, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2022.0104
Hermann, E. (2022). Psychological targeting: Nudge or boost? AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01403-4
Huang, M. (2023). Green advertising, gamification and sustainable behaviour. Sustainability, 15(4), 2883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042883
Ibrahim, R. (2008). Setting up a research question. ALAM CIPTA, 3(1).
Ibrahim, R. (2011). Demystifying the arduous doctoral journey. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 9(2).
Ibrahim, R. (2020). Thinking Tools: Navigating a Three-Year PhD Journey. Partridge Publishing.
Ibrahim, R., & Mustafa Kamal, R. (2018). Templates for Thinking. https://www.scribd.com/document/505715188/2-Template-used-for-structuring-LRe
Jaeger, A.-K., & Weber, A. (2020). Increasing sustainable consumption. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 48(8), 803–824. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-02-2019-0044
Ji, S., & Lin, P. S. (2022). Aesthetics of sustainability. Sustainability, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084649
Kim, W., & Cha, S. (2021). Attributes of green advertising and purchase intention. Sustainability, 13, 8723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168723
Li, C. (2022). Generation Z youth in the midst of socio-economic change. China Youth Studies, 08, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2022.0105
Li, L. (2022). A study on the perceptions and consumption of the ‘Generation Z’ group. Journal of Hubei College of Economics, 19(03), 50–52.
Liu, S., & Liu, X. (2020). Culture and green advertising preference. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1944. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01944
Liu, Y., & Zhu, B. (2022). Advertising symbols and adolescent consumerism. Chinese Journal of Education, 09, 136.
Matchett, K. K. (2009). Mediated communication of sustainable consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00754.x
McCracken, G. (1987). Advertising: Meaning or information. ACR North American Advances, 14.
Mick, D. G. (1986). Consumer research and semiotics. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1086/209060
Oswald, L. R. (2015). Creating Value: The Theory and Practice of Marketing Semiotics Research. Oxford University Press.
Pigulevskiy, V. O., & Mirskaya, L. A. (2020). Design and symbolic consumption. Revista Inclusiones, 7, 644–656.
Robichaud, Z., & Yu, H. (2021). Ethical consumption among Gen Z. British Food Journal, 124(9), 2740–2760. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2021-0536
Selma, K.-M. (2019). Understanding sustainable consumption behavior among young adults. Journal of Business Research, 104, 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.040
Shao, J. (2019). Sustainable consumption in China: New trends. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(8), 1507–1517. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2327
Sheng, Q., & Yue, Q. (2022). Symbolic consumption, value identity and emotional connection. South East Communications, 09, 115–118. https://doi.org/10.13556/j.cnki.dncb.cn35-1274/j.2022.09.015
Sweeney, E. (2022). Teenagers’ moral advertising literacy. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1964227
Tangsupwattana, W., & Liu, X. (2018). Emotional experience and symbolic consumption. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(5), 514–527. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2017-0316
UNEP, UN Global Compact Office, & Utopies. (2017). Talk the Walk: Advancing Sustainable Lifestyles through Marketing and Communications. http://www.unep.org/resources/report/talk-walk-advancing-sustainable-lifestyles-through-marketing-and-communications
Visser, M. (2015). Communicating sustainable shoes to mainstream consumers. Sustainability, 7(7), 8420–8440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7078420
Wang, S., & Zhou, J. (2022). The origin, development and response of Generation Z youth subculture. China Youth Studies, 08, 28–35. https://doi.org/10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2022.0118
Wang, Y. (2021). The logic of Generation Z subculture consumption. China Youth Studies, 11, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2021.0168
White, K. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649
Witt, U. (2010). Symbolic consumption and the social construction of product characteristics. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 21(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2009.11.008
Xie, Y., & Wang, X. (2022). A review of Generation Z research. China Youth Studies, 10, 102–109. https://doi.org/10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2022.0142
Yang, D. (2015). Going green: How different advertising appeals impact green consumption. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2663–2675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.04.004
Yang, R. (2022). The generation and criticism of symbol consumerism on the Internet. Nanjing Social Sciences, 12, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.15937/j.cnki.issn1001-8263.2022.12.014
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). SAGE.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
Zhang, L., & Yang, Y. (2021). From ‘Out of the Circle’ to ‘Breaking the Circle’. Theory Monthly, 05, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.14180/j.cnki.1004-0544.2021.05.013
Zipser, D., & Poh, F. (2020). China’s Generation Z has just grown up, how to capture their hearts? McKinsey Greater China. https://www.mckinsey.com.cn
Yan, G., Me, R. C., & Costa, F. De. (2025). A Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Advertising Design to Engage Generation Z in China. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(8), 452–462.