Effective land governance requires more than well-designed policies—it demands understanding the underlying factors that enable or obstruct implementation. In complex domains like idle land management, traditional research methods struggle to identify these governance determinants due to institutional complexity and administrative opacity. This study proposes an integrated approach combining the Delphi technique with case validation to systematically identify and validate determinants of effective land management. A two-round Delphi process builds consensus among experts from Malaysia's multi-level governance system, using a 10-point scale to prioritize determinants. These findings are then validated through analysis of successful idle land redevelopment projects. The approach offers methodological advantages over surveys, interviews, and single-case studies by enabling comprehensive inquiry within complex institutional systems. It strengthens both validity and practical relevance, supporting theory development while generating actionable policy insights. The methodology provides land researchers and policymakers with a rigorous, adaptable framework for diagnosing governance problems and designing targeted interventions.
Brady, S. R. (2015). Utilizing and adapting the Delphi method for use in qualitative research. International journal of qualitative methods, 14(5), 1609406915621381.
Brown, J. (2018). Interviews, focus groups, and Delphi techniques. In Advanced research methods for applied psychology (pp. 95-106). Routledge.
Burns, T., Grant, C., Nettle, K., Brits, A. M., & Dalrymple, K. (2007). Land administration reform: indicators of success and future challenges. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper, 37, 1-227.
Cole, Z. D., Donohoe, H. M., & Stellefson, M. L. (2013). Internet-based Delphi research: case based discussion. Environmental management, 51, 511-523.
Deininger, K., & Feder, G. (2009). Land registration, governance, and development: Evidence and implications for policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 24(2), 233-266.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12(2), 219-245.
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. mit Press.
Grindle, M. S. (2007). Good enough governance revisited. Development policy review, 25(5), 533-574.
Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 12(1).
Ismail, A., Mohd Nazari, N., & Abdullah, N. A. A. (2025). Exploring a fuzzy relationships among criteria for the development of community-based tourism in Malaysia: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 7(2), 85-106.
Ismail, M. S. (2023). Land administration in Peninsular Malaysia: a general overview. Jurnal Land, 1(1), 1-15.
Kashyap, A., & Lakhanpal, P. (2022). Development of levels of buyer-supplier collaboration: a Delphi study. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 13(1), 27-52.
Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. The lancet, 365(9464), 1099-1104.
Metwaly, A., Kriaa, A., Hassani, Z., Carraturo, F., Druart, C., Arnauts, K., ... & Haller, D. (2025). A Consensus Statement on establishing causality, therapeutic applications and the use of preclinical models in microbiome research. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 1-14.
Nowack, M., Endrikat, J., & Guenther, E. (2011). Review of Delphi-based scenario studies: Quality and design considerations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1603-1615.
Olagunju, A. O. (2016). Integration of environmental assessment with planning and policy-making on a regional scale: Towards an environmental governance agenda (Doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan).
Ostrom, E. (2009). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton university press.
Paavola, J. (2007). Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization. Ecological economics, 63(1), 93-103.
Palin, V., Van Staa, T. P., Steels, S., Troxel, A. B., Groenwold, R. H., MacDonald, T. M., ... & GetReal Initiative. (2022). A first step towards best practice recommendations for the design and statistical analyses of pragmatic clinical trials: A modified Delphi approach. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 88(12), 5183-5201.
Papastavrou, E., Andreou, P., & Vryonides, S. (2014). The hidden ethical element of nursing care rationing. Nursing Ethics, 21(5), 583-593.
Peters, B. G. (2015). Pursuing horizontal management: The politics of public sector coordination. University Press of Kansas.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford university press.
Rahmat, N., & Zainudin, A. Z. (2023, December). Effective idle land management: a conceptual framework from land management paradigm. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1274, No. 1, p. 012033). IOP Publishing.
Rothstein, B. O., & Teorell, J. A. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165-190.
Samsudin, S. (2014). Decentralisation and Governance in Land Administration Systems (Doctoral dissertation, University of Ulster).
Szulecki, K., & Overland, I. (2020). Energy democracy as a process, an outcome and a goal: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science, 69, 101768.
Walters, D., Kotze, D. C., Rebelo, A., Pretorius, L., Job, N., Lagesse, J. V., ... & Cowden, C. (2021). Validation of a rapid wetland ecosystem services assessment technique using the Delphi method. Ecological Indicators, 125, 107511.
Zevenbergen, J., Augustinus, C., Antonio, D., & Bennett, R. (2013). Pro-poor land administration: Principles for recording the land rights of the underrepresented. Land use policy, 31, 595-604.
Rahmat, N., Zainudin, A. Z., & Azlan, M. H. (2025). Methodological Choices for Identifying Determinants in Land Management: Why Delphi and Case Validation Work. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(6), 1702–1712.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
