This literature review explores the concepts and perspectives of employees taking charge of behavior in the organizational context. The paper examines the definition of taking charge behavior, the antecedents and outcomes of such behavior, and the various perspectives through which it can be understood. The study utilizes a secondary source of data collection, focusing on relevant studies related to Employee taking charge behavior in public organizations. The findings highlight the proactive and constructive nature of taking charge behavior, its voluntary nature, and its focus on enhancing organizational functioning. Additionally, the paper discusses the psychological, organizational, managerial, and social perspectives that shed light on the factors influencing employees' take charge behaviors and the outcomes associated with such behavior. The research contributes to a deeper understanding of Employee taking charge behavior and provides valuable insights for practitioners and researchers.
Andrews, C. W. (2021). Self-determination theory. In Research Handbook on HRM in the PubliSector (pp. 232–244). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Auernhammer, J., & Hall, H. (2014). Organizational culture in knowledge creation, creativity a innovation: Towards the Freiraum model.40(2), 154–166.
Chen, C.-A., Hsieh, C.-W., & Chen, D.-Y. (2021). Can training enhance public employees’ publicservice motivation? A pretest–posttest design. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(1), 194–215.
Chen, J.-T., Cheng, Z.-H., Wang, H.-Q., & Li, D. (2020). Does leader narcissism hinder employees taking charge? An affective events theory perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 48(10), 1–13.
Chen, L., Hu, X., & Liu, B. (2023). Fueling the taking charge behaviors of civil servants: The different roles of workload and non-economic reward. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 28(3), 345–373.
Cherian, J., & Jacob, J. (2013). Impact of self efficacy on motivation and performance of employees. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(14), 80.
Dahleez, K. A., & Abdelmuniem Abdelfattah, F. (2022). Transformational leadership and organizational performance of Omani SMEs: The role of market orientation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(8), 3809–3825.
Daraba, D., Wirawan, H., Salam, R., & Faisal, M. (2021). Working from home during the corona pandemic: Investigating the role of authentic leadership, psychological capital, and gender on employee performance. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1885573.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1(20), 416–436.
Donkor, F., Appienti, W. A., & Achiaah, E. (2022). The impact of transformational leadership style on employee turnover intention in state-owned enterprises in Ghana. The mediating role of organisational commitment. Public Organization Review, 22(1), 1–17.
Fu, H., Du, Y., & Wang, Z. (2022). Authentic leadership and taking charge behavior: A moderated mediation model of psychological capital and occupational calling. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5492.
Guo, Q., & Zhang, Z. (2024). Employees’ taking charge behavior and empowering leadership: The role of leader trust in employees and risk propensity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 45(3), 526–543.
Han, C.-C., Chen, H., Yang, N., Wang, X.-H. F., & Wang, B.-L. (2023). Empowering leadership and leader’s psychological well-being: A moderated mediation model. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 51(5), 1–12.
Kawasaki, S. (2019). Effects of psychological need satisfaction on proactive work behaviors. Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Kumar, N., Liu, Z., & Jin, Y. (2022). Evaluation of employee empowerment on taking charge behaviour: An application of perceived organizational support as a moderator. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 1055–1066.
Liu, Y., Chen, L., Zhao, L., & Li, C. (2021). The interactive effect of organizational identification and organizational climate on employees’ taking charge behavior: A complexity perspective. Complexity, 2021(1), 7040620.
Llorente-Alonso, M., García-Ael, C., & Topa, G. (2024). A meta-analysis of psychological empowerment: Antecedents, organizational outcomes, and moderating variables. Current Psychology, 43(2), 1759–1784.
Malik, P. (2024). Exploring the role of individual-focused transformational leadership in facilitating taking charge: Mediating mechanism of psychological capital and thriving at work. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(2), 435–455.
Murray, W. C., & Holmes, M. R. (2021a). Impacts of employee empowerment and organizational commitment on workforce sustainability. Sustainability, 13(6), 3163.
Murray, W. C., & Holmes, M. R. (2021b). Impacts of employee empowerment and organizational commitment on workforce sustainability. Sustainability, 13(6), 3163.
Nurani, D. W., SAMDIN, S., NASRUL, N., & SUKOTJO, E. (2021). The effect of leadership style on organizational commitment and employee performance: An empirical study from Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(12), 141–151.
Qing, M., Asif, M., Hussain, A., & Jameel, A. (2020). Exploring the impact of ethical leadership on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in public sector organizations: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Review of Managerial Science, 14(6), 1405–1432.
Ren, L., Liu, Y., & Yin, Y. (2023). Do grateful employees take charge more in China? A joint moderating effect model. Asia Pacific Business Review, 29(1), 70–88.
Wang, C.-J., & Yang, I.-H. (2021). Why and how does empowering leadership promote proactive work behavior? An examination with a serial mediation model among hotel employees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2386.
Wang, Q., Wang, J., Zhou, X., Li, F., & Wang, M. (2020). How inclusive leadership enhances follower taking charge: The mediating role of affective commitment and the moderating role of traditionality. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 1103–1114.
Wee BV, B. D. (2016). How to write a literature review paper? Transport Reviews, 36(2), 278–288.
Wei, C., & Zhang, L. (2023a). Mechanisms of knowledge workers’ adaptive perfectionism on taking charge. Chinese Management Studies, 17(3), 620–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-12-2021-0508
Wei, C., & Zhang, L. (2023b). Mechanisms of knowledge workers’ adaptive perfectionism on taking charge. Chinese Management Studies, 17(3), 620–636.
Wright, B. E., & Pandey, S. K. (2011). Public organizations and mission valence: When does mission matter? Administration & Society, 43(1), 22–44.
Xu, A. J., Loi, R., & Chow, C. W. C. (2022). Why and when proactive employees take charge at work: The role of servant leadership and prosocial motivation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(1), 117–127.
Zeng, H., Zhao, L., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Inclusive leadership and taking-charge behavior: Roles of psychological safety and thriving at work. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 62.
Zhang, D., Wang, X., & Zhang, S. (2024). The influence of shared leadership on taking charge behavior: Dual perspective of cognition–affection. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–21.Zhang, Y., Yin, Y., & Su, W. (2024). The Impact of Servant Leadership on Proactive Service Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 178.
Addis, A. W. (2025). Concepts & Perspectives of Employee Taking Charge Behavior: A Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(6), 253-264.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
