Survivors of sexual assault face numerous challenges that significantly impact their recovery, including physical and psychological trauma, societal stigma, and inadequate access to essential services. Gender-Based Violence (GBV) recovery centers play a crucial role in addressing these challenges by providing comprehensive medical, psychological, and legal support. These centers serve as critical resources for survivors, offering a safe space for healing and recovery. This study utilizes Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Model as the conceptual lens to analyze the multifaceted influences on survivor recovery. This model emphasizes the importance of understanding the various systemic levels micro, meso, exo, macro, and chrono that interact to shape the experiences of survivors. By applying this framework, we can better understand how different factors contribute to or hinder recovery efforts. The focus of this research is to explore how Bronfenbrenner’s model informs psychosocial interventions across multiple systemic levels. By examining each level of the ecological model, we can identify specific areas where interventions can be enhanced to better support survivors of GBV. This approach highlights the interconnectedness of individual experiences and broader societal factors in shaping recovery outcomes. The study reveals significant gaps in resource availability within GBV recovery centers. For instance, only 42.86% of centers have adequate private rooms to ensure confidentiality for survivors, while 71.43% have trauma forms available for documentation. These findings indicate that effective survivor-centered care requires consistent access to immediate resources. Additionally, limited inter-organizational collaboration was noted, with only 14.29% of centers utilizing referral directories, undermining comprehensive support for survivors. In conclusion, Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Model provides a structured approach to understanding and addressing gaps in recovery services for sexual assault survivors. By recognizing the interplay between various systemic levels, stakeholders can implement targeted interventions that enhance resource availability and improve overall recovery outcomes. Systemic improvements are essential for creating a more supportive environment that fosters healing and empowers survivors on their journey to recovery. The study recommends that enhance micro-system resources by increasing the availability of counseling standard operating procedures (SOPs) and Post-Rape Care (PRC) kits. Improve meso-system linkages through effective referral mechanisms among recovery centers and community organizations. Address exo- and macro-system gaps with policy reforms that promote survivor-centric legislation and increase societal engagement in GBV issues. Adapt interventions to meet the chrono-system's temporal needs by designing flexible care models that respond to the evolving stages of survivor recovery. By implementing these recommendations, we can work towards a more integrated and effective support system for survivors of gender-based violence.
Bond, K., & Davis, K. (2024). Improving the Likelihood of Positive Outcomes for Survivors of Sexual Violence, Considering Intersections Between Justice, Gender, and Trauma. Social Policy & Administration.
Braun, M. (2024). Mindful self-compassion intervention among women veterans experiencing military sexual trauma: A pilot study. Journal of Trauma & Stress, 37(2), 234-245.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P.A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W.Damon & R.M.Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology (6th ed., Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.
Campodonico, C., Varese, F., & Berry, K. (2022). Trauma and psychosis: a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of people with psychosis on the influence of traumatic experiences on psychotic symptoms and quality of life. BMC psychiatry, 22(1), 213.
Canton, H. (2021). International Organization for Migration—IOM. In The Europa Directory of International Organizations 2021 (pp. 350-354). Routledge.
Clark-Taylor, A. (2022). Recovering through service: Meaning making and resiliency to trauma. Journal of College and Character, 23(2), 144-159.
Dabby, C., & Yoshihama, M. (2021). Gender-based violence and culturally specific advocacy in Asian and Pacific Islander communities. In Handbook of interpersonal violence and abuse across the lifespan: A project of the national partnership to end interpersonal violence across the lifespan (NPEIV) (pp. 2675-2703). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Dworkin, E. R. (2023). Psychosocial interventions for survivors of rape and sexual assault: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. PMC10552071
Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Elendu, I. D., Elendu, T. C., Amaechi, E. C., Usoro, E. U., ... & Balogun, B. B. (2024). Global perspectives on the burden of sexually transmitted diseases: A narrative review. Medicine, 103(20), e38199.
Hanmer, L., Ekhator-Mobayode, U., Al-Ahmadi, A., & Rawlings, L (2024). Increasing Gender Equality in Fragile, Conflict, and Violence Settings.
Hossain, M. (2024). The importance of social responses to survivor disclosure in recovery trajectories: A community case study. Frontiers in Public Health. 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1458510
Jaffe, P. G. (2022). The impact of social support on sexual assault survivors: A longitudinal study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(5-6), 1019-1036.
Kassim, A. (2022). The Experiences of Female Survivors of Gender Based Violence in Recovery Centres in Nairobi City County (Doctoral dissertation).
Muiruri, F. M. (2023). Assessment of Gender-based Violence Response Through Policare Centre; the Case of Central Police Headquarters in Nanyuki (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).
Munnik, L. (2023). Risk and Resilience: Exploring the Ecological Factors that Impact the Recovery of Sexual Assault Survivors at Two Centres in the Western Cape. Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health.
Onkoba, P. K. (2023). Determinants of Health Facility Preparedness in The Management of Gender Based Violence: A Case of Primary Health Facilities in Mombasa County (Doctoral dissertation, KeMU).
Proença, I. (2022). Comparing interpersonal psychotherapy to sertraline for PTSD treatment among women survivors of recent sexual violence: A randomized controlled trial in Brazil. Psychological Medicine, 52(10), 1744-1753.
Qazi, R. (2024). Survivor-Centered and Trauma-Informed Approaches to Policies and Tools in the International Development Sector (Doctoral dissertation, Université d'Ottawa/University of Ottawa).
Steenkamp, M. M. (2021). PTSD in the year following sexual assault: A meta-analysis of prevalence and recovery rates. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(4), 672-688. PMC8766599
Symes, L. (2024). Arriving at readiness to recover emotionally after sexual assault: Factors influencing recovery processes among survivors. Journal of Trauma & Stress, 37(1), 45-56.
Burg, S., & Young, E. (2024). Strengthening Gender-Based Violence Interventions Through Trust-Building.
Zinzow, H. M., Littleton, H., Muscari, E., & Sall, K. (2022). Barriers to formal help-seeking following sexual violence: Review from within an ecological systems framework. Victims & Offenders, 17(6), 893-918.
Kipchirchir, M., Nyamwange, C., & Ngeno, G. (2025). Applying Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Model to Psychosocial Interventions for Sexual Assault Survivors: A Case Study of Resource Availability and Utilization in Gender-Based Violence Recovery Centers in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(5), 707–722.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
