International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Influence of Non-Governmental Organizations’ Participatory Level of Governance on Accountability to Stakeholders in Kisumu Municipality, Kenya

Open access
The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of governance on accountability to stakeholders by Non-Governmental Organizations in Kisumu Municipality, Kenya. Objective of the article was to establish the level at which participation as an element of governance influence accountability to stakeholders by NGOs in Kisumu Municipality. The research question was, at what level does participation as an element of governance influence accountability to stakeholders by NGOs in Kisumu Municipality? The study employed descriptive survey design. The study population included 96 respondents from 96 NGOs in Kisumu Municipality; from each NGO there was one respondent, a project manager or an equivalent of a project manager. Probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling method was used to sample NGOs from which respondents to the questionnaire were drawn. Data was collected by use of questionnaires. A pilot study was conducted in Kakamega Municipality among 15 project manager or NGO officers of equivalent ranks from 15 NGOs, to ensure instrument reliability. Face validity of the instruments was determined by two experts who are the supervisors at the University of Nairobi to evaluate each item in relation to the objectives and assess if the instrument is answering the research question. Quantitative data was analyzed by use of descriptive statistics in form of frequency counts, percentages. Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 17 software was used for data analysis. Regression was also done to assess the indicators of accountability while holding the predictor indicators of governance constant. The researcher performed the ANOVA to test hypothesis with the significance level for the test selected at 5% (p = 0.05). Null hypothesis was retained at p < 0.05 and rejected at p>0.05. Findings revealed that the stakeholders who would participate in making decision on the type of project to be undertaken by the NGO, the donors and NGO staff members have the strongest voice at (48.7%) each totaling to 92.4 percent. This study therefore recommends building of synergy among various NGOs, donors, the government and the local communities with a view to promote and encourage active involvement of the beneficiary community in all the phases of various project cycles; especially participation of the local community in decision-making.
Bebbington, & J. Gray, R (2005). Ngos, civil society and accountability: making the people accountable to capital. Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 19 (3), pp. 319-348
Binswanger-Mkhize, H.P. & de Regt J.P. (Eds.). (2010). Local and community driven development: moving to scale in theory and practice. Washington D.C.: The World Bank
Borstein, E. (2005). The spirit of development: protestant ngos, morality, andeconomics in Zimbabwe. Los Angeles: Stanford University Press
Cleaver, F. (2006). Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development. In Edwards, M., and Fowler, A. (Eds.), Ngo management. London: Earthscan Publications Limited
Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of management review, 20 (1), pp. 65-91
Edwards, M. & Hulme, D. (2006). Ngo performance and accountability: introduction and overview. In Edwards, M., and Fowler, A. (Eds.), Ngo management. London: Earthscan Publications Limited
Edwards, M. & Hulme, D. (2006). Beyond the magic bullet? lessons and conclusions. In European Foundation Centre. (2011). Exploring transparency and accountability regulation of public-benefit foundations in Europe. Retrieved from http://www.efc.be/programmes_services.pdf
Goodspeed, R. (2008). Public participation in urban planning. Columbia:
Dream-Host
Gok .(2006). Sessional paper no 1 of 2006 on non-governmental organizations. Nairobi: Government Press
Hope Sr., K.R. (2003). The uneca and good governance in Africa. Harvard international development conference 2003: governance and development in a dynamic global environment. Boston: United Nations Economic Commission for Africa
IFAD. (2001). Participatory approach for an impact-oriented project cycle. Retrieved from http://www.ifad.org
Jack, W. (2001). Public policy toward nongovernmental organizations in developing countries. Washington D.C.: The World Bank
Kefela, G.T. (2011). Good governance enhance the efficiency and effectiveness in public spending – sub-saharan countries. African journal of business management, 5 (11), pp. 3995-3999
Kim, J. (2003). Accountability, governance, and non-governmental organizations: a comparative study of twelve Asian-pacific nations. Gwanak: Seoul National University
Kothari, C.R. (2008). Research methodology: methods and techniques, second revised edition. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers
Kreitner, R. (2005). Management, tenth edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company
Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research
activities. Educational and psychological measurement. Retrieved from http://people.usd.edu/~mbaron/edad810/Krejcie.pdf
Lassner, K. J. (2006). Guyana hiv/aids reduction and prevention project guide to ngo governance. Georgetown: GHARP
Makowski, G. (2012). Civil society in Poland – empty shell in free market jungle. Retrieved from http://visegradrevue.eu
Mallin, C.A. (2007). Corporate governance, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Mansuri, G. & Rao, V. (2004). Community-based and-driven development: a critical review. The world bank research observer, 19 (1), pp. 1-39
Mansuri, G. & Rao, V. (2011). Participatory development reconsidered Development outreach, 13 (1), pp. 66-69
Mostashari, A. (2005). An introduction to non-governmental organizations (ngo) management. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/isg/NGOManagement.pdf
Naidoo, K.(2003). Civil society accountability: ‘who guards the guardians?’New York: CIVICUS
NGOs Coordination Board. (2009). Report on the national validation survey of ngos. Nairobi: NGOs Co-ordination Board
NGOs Coordination Board. (2008). Terms and conditions of registration, revised july 2008. Retrieved from http://www.ngoburea.or.ke
Paiz, J.M., Angeli, E.,Wagner, J., Lawrick, E., Moore, K., Anderson, M. & Keck, R. (2012). Apa tables and figures. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/560/20
PEN . (2010). Background notes for the ngo law review cso consultation workshops. Nairobi: Poverty Eradication Network
Polonsky, L. (1995). Stakeholders’ model. Retrieved from http://library.shsu.edu
Riley, J. (2003). Stakeholders in rural development: critical collaboration in state ngo partnerships. London: Sage Publications
Transparency International. (2009). Developing a code of conduct for ngos. Retrieve from www.transparency.org
Wearing, R. (2008). Cases in corporate governance. Los Angeles: Sage Publications
Williams, C. (2003). New trends in financing the non-profit sector in the united states: the transformation of private capital – reality or rhetoric? In The nonprofit sector in a changing economy. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development
World Bank. (2008).Using training to build capacity for development: an evaluation of the world bank’s project-based and wbi training. Washington, D.C: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Wyatt, M. (2004). A handbook of ngo governance. Budapest: European Center for Not-for-Profit Law