This paper discusses the cultural significance of sculpture in urban public spaces and its impact on urban image, local identity, and social interaction. As a distinctive art form, sculpture not only enhances the aesthetic appeal of urban environments but also serves as a cultural bridge between history and the future, fostering emotional resonance among citizens and strengthening community identity. Through interviews, this paper provides insights into the perceptions and views of local residents, artists and cultural scholars, tourists and visitor groups, and community managers on the cultural significance of urban public sculpture. This study argues that sculpture fulfills multiple functions in urban public spaces, including environmental beautification, historical commemoration, social value expression, and participation in the creation of urban public art. Moreover, through its visual and symbolic nature, sculpture can provide emotional support for urban residents, offering a sense of cultural belonging and spiritual connection. To fully realize these cultural functions, the design and placement of sculptures should align with community needs, cultural contexts, and social values. Additionally, the integration of digital technology presents new opportunities for innovation in urban sculpture. This paper highlights that through government policy support, public engagement, and technological advancements, sculpture can play a vital role in urban cultural development, infusing public spaces with renewed vitality. As a key medium of urban culture, sculpture not only enhances the urban landscape but also serves as a vehicle for historical transmission and spiritual expression. Future research should further explore how to optimize spatial planning and technological applications in sculpture to accommodate the evolving cultural demands of urban societies.
Al-Zadjali, Z. (2024). The significance of art in revealing a culture’s identity and multiculturalism. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 12(1), 232-250.
Andrews, M. (1999). Landscape and western art (Vol. 10). Oxford University Press.
Bakreski, Y. (2022). The Impact of Technological Advancements on Art –Parallels Between the Renaissance, the Discovery ofPhotography, and the Digital Revolution. 11(04), 17-25.
Banerjee, T. (2001). The future of public space: Beyond invented streets and reinvented places. Journal of the American planning association, 67(1), 9-24.
Baykurt, A. E., & Gö?ebakan, Y. (2024). Cultural Existence in World Art History and Dominant Cultural Identity Traces in Works of Art. Electronic Turkish Studies, 19(1).
Budja, M. (2004). The transition to farming and the'revolution'of symbols in the Balkans. From ornament to entoptic and external symbolic storage. Documenta Praehistorica, 31, 59-81.
Carmona, M. (2021). Public places urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Routledge.
Di Dio, C., Macaluso, E., & Rizzolatti, G. (2007). The golden beauty: brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures. PLoS One, 2(11), e1201.
Ferilli, G., Sacco, P. L., Tavano Blessi, G., & Forbici, S. (2017). Power to the people: when culture works as a social catalyst in urban regeneration processes (and when it does not). European Planning Studies, 25(2), 241-258.
Gaffikin, F., Mceldowney, M., & Sterrett, K. (2010). Creating shared public space in the contested city: The role of urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 15(4), 493-513.
Galchynska, O., Petrova, I., Martynenko, A., Kvasnytsya, R., & Kryvoruchko, M. (2023). Comparative analysis of aesthetic and functional aspects of design approaches in the context of contemporary art. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 12(72), 216-225.
Gjesdal, K., Rush, F., & Torsen, I. (2020). Philosophy of Sculpture: Historical Problems, Contemporary Approaches. Routledge.
Grabalov, P., & Nordh, H. (2022). The future of urban cemeteries as public spaces: Insights from Oslo and Copenhagen. Planning theory & practice, 23(1), 81-98.
Herder, J. G. (2011). Sculpture: some observations on shape and form from Pygmalion's creative dream. University of Chicago Press.
Iacobone, A. (2021). Improvisation in Sculpture. In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy and Improvisation in the Arts (pp. 585-599). Routledge.
Ignatieva, M., Stewart, G. H., & Meurk, C. (2011). Planning and design of ecological networks in urban areas. Landscape and ecological engineering, 7, 17-25.
Kaya, K. (2024). How Does Japanese Cultural Principles Improve Japanese Human-centric Urban Development in Tokyo, Japan? Communications in Humanities Research, 63, 31-36.
Li, N. (2024). The Micro Narrative Language Embodied by Shapes in Contemporary Sculpture Art. Cultura: International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 21(1).
Lomas, T. (2016). Positive art: Artistic expression and appreciation as an exemplary vehicle for flourishing. Review of General Psychology, 20(2), 171-182.
Murwonugroho, W. (2019). Mediating role of social media in the memorability of street sculpture art: Jogja Street sculpture Project 2017 as case study. Wacana Seni Journal of Arts Discourse, 18, 95-124.
Naya, R. B., de la Cal Nicolás, P., Medina, C. D., Ezquerra, I., García-Pérez, S., & Monclús, J. (2023). Quality of public space and sustainable development goals: analysis of nine urban projects in Spanish cities. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(3), 477-495.
Oluseyi, O. F. (2006). Urban land use change analysis of a traditional city from remote sensing data: The case of Ibadan metropolitan area, Nigeria. Humanity & Social Sciences Journal, 1(1), 42-64.
Papavasileiou, V., Nikolaou, E., Andreadakis, N., Xanthacou, Y., & Kaila, M. (2021). The role of art in environmental education. IJAEDU-International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 6(18), 287-295.
Páramo, P. (2017). The city as an environment for urban experiences and the learning of cultural practices. Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research, 275-290.
Raffle, H. S. (2008). Sculpting behavior: a tangible language for hands-on play and learning Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
Sabour, M., Yousef?, M. S., & Yousef?, F. S. (2015). Role of urban sculptures in Beautification and Improvement of quality of urban spaces (case study: Fuman County). Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 36(3), 4070-4082.
Schnell, S. M., & Reese, J. F. (2003). Microbreweries as tools of local identity. Journal of cultural geography, 21(1), 45-69.
Stanley, B. W., Stark, B. L., Johnston, K. L., & Smith, M. E. (2012). Urban open spaces in historical perspective: A transdisciplinary typology and analysis. Urban geography, 33(8), 1089-1117.
Taracha, P. (2012). The Sculptures of Alacahöyük: A Key to Religious Symbolism in Hittite Representational Art. Near Eastern Archaeology, 75(2), 108-115.
Wang, Y. (2022). The interaction between public environmental art sculpture and environment based on the analysis of spatial environment characteristics. Scientific Programming, 2022(1), 5168975.
Wango, K. (2021). Generation and Interpretation of Sculptural Ideas in Large Scale Stone Sculptures Placed in Outdoor Public Spaces: An Analysis of the Stone Sculptures of Gerald Motondi Oroo. International Journal of Advanced Research, 3(1), 86-114.
Widrich, M. (2024). Performative Monuments: The rematerialisation of public art. In Performative monuments. Manchester University Press.
Yang, H., Amnueypol, U., & Wang, Y. (2023). Creating Cultural Sculpture: Analyzing the Value of Traditional Chinese Sculpture Based on the Five Levels of Human Cognition. International Journal of Arts Theory & History, 18(2).
Yingfang, Z., Hassan, S. A., & Noh, L. M. M. (2024). Exploring the Multidimensional Interactions of Soft Sculpture in Urban Spaces. International Journal of Business and Technology Management, 6(2), 520-533.
Zakaria, R. (2019). Public Sculptures as an Informal Educational Tool Towards Local Society. Third International Conference of Arts, Language and Culture (ICALC 2018),
Zheng, J. (2021). Structuring artistic creativity for the production of a ‘creative city’: Urban sculpture planning in Shanghai. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 45(5), 795-813.
Zhu, X., Zhang, B., Xiang, S., Zhao, W., & Mihalko, C. (2022). Testing Olmsted’s lasting legacy—Comparing design theory and the post-occupancy conditions of New York Central Park. Buildings, 12(12), 2217.
Cui, L., & Misdih, M. Bin. (2025). Exploring the Cultural Significance of Sculpture in Urban Public Spaces. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(3), 2011–2024.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode