The aim of this study is to determine the university students' views on Web 2.0 tools and their level of use of Web 2.0 tools according to the variables of gender, Foreign Language Level, Computer usage level and frequency of access to the internet. The study group consists of 427 students who continue their studies at the Ahmet Kele?o?lu Faculty of Education of Necmettin Erbakan University in the academic year 2019-2020. The data in the study was taken with a three-part tool. In the first section, demographic characteristics of the students who participated in the research were determined. In the second section, the frequencies of use of Web 2.0 technologies were asked. In the third section, students were asked about their skills in using Web 2.0 tools. Data were analyzed by statistical package programs. T-test and variance analysis were used to determine whether the students' views on Web 2.0 tools differ according to gender, foreign language level, computer usage level and frequency of access to the internet. The Scheffe test was used to determine which group the differentiation originated from. In terms of the frequency of use of Web 2.0, men are significantly different from women, those who have computers and those who are connected to the internet for 7 hours and more than others. In terms of Web 2.0 skill level, men are significantly different from women, those who have computers, those who have 7 hours and more internet connections, compared to others.
Ahmed, A. M., AbdelAlmuniem, A., & Almabhouh, A. A. (2016). The current use of web 2.0 tools in university teaching from the perspective of faculty members at the college of education. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 179-194.
Albion, P. R. (2008). Web 2.0 in teacher education: Two imperatives for action. Computers in the Schools, 25(3-4), 181-198.
Alghizzawi, M., Habes, M., Salloum, S. A., Abd, M., Ghani, C. M., & Shaalan, K. (2019). The effect of social media usage on students’e-learning acceptance in higher education: A case study from the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Information Technology, 3(3), 13-26.
AlJeraisy, M. N., Mohammad, H., Fayyoumi, A., & Alrashideh, W. (2015). Web 2.0 in education: The impact of discussion board on student performance and satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(2), 247-258.
Andriole, S. J. (2010). Business impact of Web 2.0 technologies. Communications of the ACM, 53(12), 67-79.
Atas, A. H., & Çelik, B. (2019). Smartphone Use of University Students: Patterns, Purposes, and Situations. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), 59-70.
Barbara N., & Linda B., (2013). Changing academic teaching with Web 2.0 technologies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(3), 315-325. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2013.796727
Bennett, S., Bishop, A., Dalgarno, B., Waycott, J., & Kennedy, G. (2012). Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 524-534.
Berthon, P. R., Pitt, L. F., Plangger, K., & Shapiro, D. (2012). Marketing meets Web 2.0, social media, and creative consumers: Implications for international marketing strategy. Business horizons, 55(3), 261-271.
Caliskan, S., Guney, Z., Sakhieva, R., Vasbieva, D., & Zaitseva, N. (2019). Teachers’ Views on the Availability of Web 2.0 Tools in Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(22), 70-81.
Cochrane, T. D. (2014). Critical success factors for transforming pedagogy with mobile Web 2.0. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8535.2012.01384.x
Coklar, A. N. (2012). Evaluations of students on Facebook as an educational environment. Online Submission, 3(2), 42-53.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
DeAndrea, D. C., Ellison, N. B., LaRose, R., Steinfield, C., & Fiore, A. (2012). Serious social media: On the use of social media for improving students' adjustment to college. The Internet and higher education, 15(1), 15-23.
Gani, A. F. A., Hassim, A. R. A., & Mohandas, E. S. (2016). Students’ Perceptions of New Web 2.0 Tools’ Usage in Classroom Instruction. In Envisioning the Future of Online Learning (pp. 247-257). Springer, Singapore.
Harris, A. L., & Rea, A. (2019). Web 2.0 and virtual world technologies: A growing impact on IS education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 3.
Heo, J., Oh, J., Subramanian, S. V., Kim, Y., & Kawachi, I. (2014). Addictive internet use among Korean adolescents: a national survey. PloS one, 9(2).
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational research review, 9, 47-64.
Huang, W. H. D., Hood, D. W., & Yoo, S. J. (2013). Gender divide and acceptance of collaborative Web 2.0 applications for learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 57-65.
Iqbal, S. (2017). Mobile Phone Usage and Students’ Perception towards M-Learning: A Case of Undergraduate Students in Pakistan. The Journal of Distance Education / Revue de l'ducation Distance, 32(1). Athabasca University Press.
Kiyici, F. (2012). Examining web 2.0 tools usage of science teacher candidates. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(4), 141-147.
Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center
Lewis, S., & Ariyachandra, T. (2011). Seniors and social networking. Journal of Information Systems Applied Research, 4(2), 4.
Mangal, V. (2013). Systems theory and social networking: Investigation of systems theory principles in web 2.0 social network systems. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 3(1), 117-133.
Moodley, K. (2019). Factors influencing the usage of web 2.0 tools in higher education (Doctoral dissertation). University of Kwazulu Natal
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. Theoretical principles of distance education, 1, 22-38.
Murugesan, S. (2007). Understanding Web 2.0. IT professional, 9(4), 34-41.
O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0.
Patel, K. (2013). Incremental journey for World Wide Web: introduced with Web 1.0 to recent Web 5.0–a survey paper. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 3(10).
Petter, C., Reich, K., & Scheuermann, F. (2005). WP1: Analysis of tools supporting communities of practice.
Rodrigues, J. J., Sabino, F. M., & Zhou, L. (2011). Enhancing e-learning experience with online social networks. IET communications, 5(8), 1147-1154.
Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring pre-service teachers' beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 classroom. Computers & Education, 59(3), 937-945.
Sabeh, H. N., Baharudin, A. S., & Abdullah, R. (2018). Web 2.0 applications usage: A comparative study between Erbil and Istanbul. Internat?onal Journal of Advanced And Appl?ed Sc?ences, 5(3), 82-88.
Saunders, S. (2008). The Role of Social Networking Sites in Teacher Education Programs: A Qualitative Exploration. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2008--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2223-2228). Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Tasir, Z., & Al-Dheleai, Y. (2019). Web 2.0 for fostering students' social presence in online learning-based interaction. JOTSE: Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(1), 13-19.
Thackeray, R., Neiger, B. L., Hanson, C. L., & McKenzie, J. F. (2008). Enhancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: use of Web 2.0 social media. Health promotion practice, 9(4), 338-343.
Thomas, M., & Thomas, H. (2012). Using new social media and Web 2.0 technologies in business school teaching and learning. Journal of Management Development.
Thompson, J. (2007). Is Education 1.0 ready for Web 2.0 students. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(4).
Tripathi, R. (2018). 'From information to interaction': website and social media usage and trends in top Indian higher education institutions. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 29(2), 139-154.
Tulaboev, A., & Oxley, A. (2012, June). A case study on using web 2.0 social networking tools in higher education. In 2012 International Conference on Computer & Information Science (ICCIS) (Vol. 1, pp. 84-88). IEEE.
Wright, B., & Akgunduz, D. (2018). The Relationship between Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Self-Efficacy Belief Levels and the Usage of Web 2.0 Applications of Pre-Service Science Teachers. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 10(1), 52-69.
Yuen, S. C. Y., & Yuen, P. (2008, March). Web 2.0 in education. In society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 3227-3228). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
https://flatworldbusiness.wordpress.com/flat-education/previously/web-1-0-vs-web-2-0-vs-web-3-0-a-bird-eye-on-the-definition/
In-Text Citation: (Azak et al., 2020)
To Cite this Article: Azak, A., Sulak, S. A., & Güner, H. E. (2020). Analysis of University Students’ Views and Usage Levels of Web 2.0 Tools in Terms of Various Variables. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(6), 571–584.
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
