International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

The Impact of Differentiation Methods (Content, Process, Product) of Differentiated Instruction on the Achievement and Perception of Students in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis of Literature in Recent Ten Years (2015-2024)

Open access
Objective: A meta-analysis of implement different differentiation methods (content, process, product) of differentiated instruction in universities affects students' achievement and perception in the past decade further. Methods: In the databases of Eric, Web of Science, and Science Direct, relevant researches on differentiated instruction for university students were collected from January 1, 2015, to March 17, 2024. After screening, there were 21 articles recorded. Applying Review Manager 5.4 software and Stata 17.0 statistical software to research deviation risk testing and quality assessment of included articles. Results:Comparison of students' achievement and students' perception after the implementation of differentiated instruction and traditional teaching methods, differentiated instruction could significantly improve students' achievement and students' perception, and it had significant statistically difference(P< 0.001). In addition, product differentiation methods improved the students' achievement at the highest, and it had significant statistically difference(P< 0.001). Process differentiation methods improved students' achievement moderately, with statistical significance (P< 0.001). While content differentiation methods showed the lowest improvement on students' achievement, and the difference emerged statistical significance(P< 0.001). Conclusion: Differentiated instruction can improve students' achievement and perception. Differentiated instruction method of product differentiation is better than content differentiation and process differentiation. Through meta-analysis, this study systematically measures the specific impact of differentiated instruction in different differentiation methods, aiming to accumulate relevant practice materials and provide systematic basis for the existing teaching reform.
Taylor, B. K. (2015). Content, process, and product: Modeling differentiated instruction. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 51(1), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2015.988559.
Zelalem, A., Melesse, S., & Seifu, A. (2022). Teacher educators' self-efficacy and perceived practices of differentiated instruction in Ethiopian primary teacher education programs: Teacher education colleges in amhara regional state in focus. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2018
Salameh, W. (2022). The Perceptions Of Undergraduate Faculty Members Of Differentiated Instruction In Efl Classrooms At A Private University In Dubai. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 14(5).
Taylor, B. K. (2015). Content, process, and product: Modeling differentiated instruction. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 51(1), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2015.988559.
Hong, L., Zheng, dong G., Shing ,O. L., & Zhu, j. A. (2022). The Impact of Reading Strategy Instruction on Reading Comprehension, Strategy Use, Motivation, and Self-Efficacy in Chinese University EFL Students.
Li, H., Gan, Z., Leung, S. O., & An, Z. (2022). The Impact of Reading Strategy Instruction on Reading Comprehension, Strategy Use, Motivation, and Self-Efficacy in Chinese University EFL Students. Sage Open, 12(1).
Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students' writing achievement, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: a mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2627–2674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1888753
Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175–194.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678
Kahmann, R., Droop, M., & Lazonder, A. W. (2022). Meta-analysis of professional development programs in differentiated instruction. International Journal of Educational Research, 116, 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102072
Asriadi, M., Hadi, S., Istiyono, E., & Retnawati, H. (2023). Does differentiated instruction affect learning outcome? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(5), 18–33.
Safawi, S. S., & Akay, C. (2022). The effect of differentiated instruction approach on students' academic achievement and attitudes: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Educational Technology, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.31248/IJET2022.163
Kanadl?, S. (2020). Research synthesis from theory to practice in social sciences quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods (3rd Edition). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
Pigott, T. D., & Polanin, J. R. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: High-quality meta-analysis in a systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 24–46.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153
Green, K. B., & Towson, J. (n.d.). (2022) "Using Ability Grouping to Examine the Effects of Differentiated Instruction in an Undergraduate Course in Communication Sciences & Disorders," Teaching and Learning in Communication Sciences & Disorders: Vol. 6: Iss. 1, Article 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30707/TLCSD6.1.1649037808.600819
Chen, J.H., & Chen, Y.C. (2018). Differentiated instruction in a calculus curriculum for college students in Taiwan. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(1), 88–95.
Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2020). A novel teaching strategy through adaptive learning activities for computer programming. IEEE Transactions on Education, 64(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2020.3012744
Theobald, M., Bellhäuser, H., & Imhof, M. (2021). Course instruction and individual differences predict learning strategy use and exam achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 87, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.101994.
Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students' writing achievement, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: a mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2627–2674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1888753
Ozenen, G. (2023). Self-Assessment and Learning Outcome Evaluation of Interior Architecture Students Using Flipped Versus Traditional Classroom Education Models. Sage Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231209891
Waer, H. (2021). The effect of integrating automated writing evaluation on EFL writing apprehension and grammatical knowledge. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1914062
Moradi, M., Liu, L., Luchies, C., Patterson, M. M., & Darban, B. (2018). Enhancing teaching-learning effectiveness by creating online interactive instructional modules for fundamental concepts of physics and mathematics. Education Sciences, 8(3), 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030109
Deng, L. (2020). The process-oriented assessment model of business English translation course in a flipped learning context. Higher Education Studies, 10(4), 1–11.
Suárez, M. del M., & Gesa, F. (2019). Learning vocabulary with the support of sustained exposure to captioned video: do proficiency and aptitude make a difference? The Language Learning Journal, 47(4), 497–517.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1617768
Bakri, S. R. A., Liew, C. Y., Chen, C. K., Tuh, M. H., & Ling, S. C. (2021). Bridging the gap between the derivatives and graph sketching in calculus: An innovative game-based learning approach. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(4), 121–136.
Barral, A. M., Ardi-Pastores, V. C., & Simmons, R. E. (2018). Student learning in an accelerated introductory biology course is significantly enhanced by a flipped-learning environment. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(3), ar38. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-07-0129
Ludwig, J. (2021). An experiment in active learning: The effects of teams. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(2), 353–360.
Phuong, A. E., Nguyen, J., & Marie, D. (2017). Evaluating an adaptive equity-oriented pedagogy: A study of its impacts in higher education. Journal of Effective Teaching, 17(2), 5–44.
Tanir, A. (2023). Turkish-speaking students' writing achievement in German as a foreign language (GFL) and their metacognitive awareness: An online collaborative writing instruction combined with metacognitive guidance. African Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 421–440.
Paiva, R. C., Ferreira, M. S., & Frade, M. M. (2017). Intelligent tutorial system based on personalized system of instruction to teach or remind mathematical concepts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(4), 370–381.
Elmabaredy, A., Elkholy, E., & Tolba, A.-A. (2020). Web-based adaptive presentation techniques to enhance learning outcomes in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-00112-3
Karamustafaoglu, S., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2015). Understanding electrochemistry concepts using the predict-observe-explain strategy. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 923–936.
Roehr-Brackin, K., Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., Olivera-Smith, L., & Torres-Marín, M. T. (2021). Are individual differences in cognitive abilities and stylistic preferences related to multilingual adults' achievement in explicit learning conditions? Language Awareness, 30(4), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1969404
El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students' engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00272-4
Cohen, A. S. (1998). An investigation of linking methods under the graded response model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22(2), 116–130.
https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216980222002
Ahn, E., & Kang, H. (2018). Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 71(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2018.71.2.103
Grain, H. M. J. S., Neamah, N. R., Al-gburi, G., Abduzahra, A. T., Hassan, A. Y., Kadhim, A. J., Obaid, A. A., & Yahea, S. A. (2022). Differentiated instructions' effect on academic achievements of level 2 English students: A case on Iraq public sectors universities. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 87–95.
Su, Y., Li, Y., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2019). Moving literature circles into wiki-based environment: The role of online self-regulation in EFL learners' attitude toward collaborative learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5–6), 556–586. doi :10.1080/09588221.2018.1527363
Su, Y., Zheng, C., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). Examining the relationship between English language learners' online self-regulation and their self-efficacy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 105–121. doi:10.14742/ajet.3548
Tong, G., & Singh, C. K. S. (2024). The Impact of Differentiation Methods (Content, Process, Product) of Differentiated Instruction on the Achievement and Perception of Students in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis of Literature in Recent Ten Years (2015-2024). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(11), 2303–2320.