The primary goal of this study is to focus on the perspectives of experienced preschool educators on the effectiveness of implementing Project-based Learning activities integrated with Technology-based Learning (PBL-TBL) in preschools, following the National Preschool Standard Curriculum 2017 (NPSC, 2017). This research aims to determine the applicability of this approach in early science education in preschool, with the goal of enhancing children's development, including their knowledge, social interaction, creative thinking skills, and motivation to learn science topics at an early age. The participants in this primary study were nine Malaysian preschool educators, each with a minimum of five years of experience teaching early science in preschool. This study utilized a qualitative methodology, employing a validated and reliable semi-structured interview instrument consisting of five questions. The data was subsequently analyzed using ATLAS.ti9 software through a theme analysis technique. Despite numerous challenges in enhancing the quality of education through early science activities, educators remain optimistic that the PBL-TBL approach can comprehensively boost children's development. Out of the 17 themes discussed, the primary focus is on the significance of the PBL-TBL approach for children, facilitating their knowledge enhancement through engaging and hands-on learning experiences. Additionally, captivating activities involving two-way communication foster increased participation and engagement from children in verbal exchanges and tasks. This approach also prioritizes learning through observation to enhance children's creativity and fosters their motivation to explore science as a key motivating factor. The dissemination of novel insights from experienced educators will encourage future researchers to engage in Research and Development (R&D) in the domain of Early Childhood Education (ECE). The current effort aims to provide a wide variety of resources that educators can use to improve the quality of early childhood education, aligning with the principles of 21st-century education and the implementation of the NPSC 2017.
Aabla, B. (2017). A review on 21st century learning models. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 6, 254–263. https://doi.org/10.12816/0036081
Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen– Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam– Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O., & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11), Article: 05312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
Abu Bakar, F., Abdullah, Z., Sharif, Z., & Mohd. Ariff, A. H. (2021). A preliminary study on the readiness of blended learning among lecturers at Universiti Utara Malaysia. Practitioner Research, 3, 57-74. https://doi.org/10.32890/pr2021.3.3
Affum, M. Q. (2022). The effect of internet on students’ studies: A review the effect of internet on students. Library Philosophy and Practice, Article: 6932.
Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1995). Interrelationship of knowledge, interest and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–0663.87.4.559
Allman, B., Kimmons, R., Wang, W., Bao, H., Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. Trends and Topics in Educational Technology, 2024 Edition. TechTrends, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528–024–00950–5
Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the Project– based Learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. SAGE Open, 10(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702
Anderman, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Gray, D. L. (2012). The challenges of teaching and learning about science in the twenty–first century: exploring the abilities and constraints of adolescent learners. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.655038
Barrow, L. (2010). Encouraging creativity with scientific inquiry. Creative Education, 1, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2010.11001.
Belagra, M., & Draoui, B. (2018). Project– based Learning and information and communication technology’s integration: Impacts on motivation. International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 55(4), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720918773051
Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE Life Science Education, 15(4), Article: 6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16–0
ChanLin, L. (2008). Technology integration applied to project– based learning in science. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701757450
Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project– based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta– analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
Clark, l., P., & Creswell, J., W. (2015). Understanding research. New Jersey: Pearson Education
Davis, E. A., & Miyake, N. (2004). Exploration of scaffolding in complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,13(3), 265– 272. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_1
Abreu, G. (2023). Preliminary literature review: A guide for effective research. mind the graph blog. Retrieved from https://mindthegraph.com/blog/preliminary-literature-review/
Dehaan, R. L. (2012). Teaching creative science thinking. Science, 334(6062), 1499–1500. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207918
Demir, K., & Akpinar, E. (2018). The effect of mobile learning applications on students' academic achievement and attitudes toward mobile learning. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 48– 59. https://doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2018.02.004
Department for Education and Skills/Qualification and Curriculum Authority (DfES & QCA). (2004). Science—the national curriculum for England. HMSO.
Disney, L., & Geng, G. (2022). Investigating young children's social interactions during digital play. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(8), 1449–1459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643–021–01275–1
Domenici, K., & Littlejohn, S. (2000). Mediation: Empowerment in conflict management. Illinois: Waveland Press.
Erviana, V. Y., Sintawati, M., Bhattacharyya, E., Habil, H., & Fatmawati, L. (2022). The effect of Project– Based Learning on technological pedagogical content knowledge among elementary school pre– service educator. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(2), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.02.15
Evelyn. (2024). The future of education: Technology in the classroom. Retrieved on April 21st, 2024, from https://www.fineshare.com/resource/technology–in–the– classroom.html
Ferrero, M., Vadillo, M. A., Leo ?n, S. P. (2021). Is project– based learning effective among kindergarten and elementary students? A systematic review. PLoS ONE 16(4), Article: 0249627. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249627Editor
Ginzburg, T., & Barak, M. (2023). Technology–enhanced learning and its association with motivation to learn science from a cross–cultural perspective. Journal of science education and technology, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956–023–10048–x
Ghoshal, S. (2023). The effect of internet on students’ studies – A review. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 9(7), 38– 42.
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project– based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article: 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Harlen, W. & Deakin Crick, R. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education, 10(2) 169–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594032000121270
Hodges, G. W., Flanagan, K., Lee, K., Cohen, A., Krishnan, S., & Ward, C. (2020). A quasi–experimental study comparing learning gains associated with serious educational gameplay and hands–on science in elementary classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(9), 1460–1489. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21661
Hoisington, C. (2024). Science in preschool, part 1: Leveraging the power of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) with consideration to Developmentally Appropriate Practice (DAP). Science and Children, 61(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368148.2023.2292324
Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528– 019– 00375– 5
Idris, R., Govindasamy, P., & Nachiappan, S. (2023). Challenge and obstacles of STEM education in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(4), 820–828. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13–i4/16676
Ilomäki, L., & Lakkala, M. (2018). Digital technology and practices for school improvement: Innovative digital school model. Research And Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1), 1– 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039–018– 0094–8
Janghorban, R., Roudsari, R. L., & Taghipour, A. (2014). Skype interviewing: The new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 9(1), Article: 24152. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.24152
Jekri, A., & Han, C. G. K. (2020). The challenges in implementing STEM teaching and learning in secondary schools. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling, 5(34), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.53400
Kaptan, K., & Timurlenk. (2012). Challenges for science education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 763–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.237
Kaya, Z., & Kaya, O. N. (2022). Comparison of inclusive and traditional science classrooms: middle school students’ attitudes towards science. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(11), 1103–1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1841839
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Educator, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
K?l?ç, I., & Ulu, M, Ö. (2022). The effect of project– based learning approach on student achievement in life science course in primary education. African Educational Research Journal, 10(3), 321– 328. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.103.22.046
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project– based Learning. Cambridge University Press
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project– based Learning: A review of the literature. Improving School, 19(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Machmud, M. T., Widiyan, A. P., & Ramadhani, N. R. (2021). The development and policies of ICT supporting educational technology in Singapore, Thailand, Indonesia, and Myanmar. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20786
Machado, J. M. (2016). Early childhood experiences in language arts. Cengage Learning.
Makaramani, R. (2015). 21st century learning design for a telecollaboration project. Procedia Social Behaviour Science, 191, 622–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.567
Markula, A., Aksela, M. The key characteristics of project– based learning: how educators implement projects in K– 12 science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4, Article: 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031– 021– 00042– x
Muchsin & Mariati. (2020). Application of Project based Learning models in improving creative thinking of students at physics lessons in SMA Bandar Baru. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute– Journal 3(2), 1453–1458. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.1008.
Mulyaningsih, D. U., & Arifin, R. A. (2021). Teacher professional development: A study of motivating factors between novice and experienced teachers. Journal of English Pedagogy and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.32627/jepal.v2i1.57
Munkebye, E., & Staberg, R. L. (2023). Qualifying the science experiences of young students through dialogue – A Norwegian lesson study. Cogent Education, 10(1), Article: 2164006. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2164006
Nathaniela, H., & Esfandiari, N. S. (2023). The influence of the use of learning technology on student learning performance in middle school. Jurnal Pendidikan Merdeka Belajar, 1(1), 1– 6.
National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
National Research Council (NRC). (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
Novak, A. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2020). In M. Moallem, W. Hung, & N. Dabbagh (Eds.), A case study of project– based learning of middle school students exploring water quality, (pp. 551–527). The Wiley handbook of problem– based learning. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119173243.ch24.
Nurhidayah, I. J., Wibowo, F. C., & Astra, I. M. (2021). Project Based Learning (PjBL) learning model in science. learning: Literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Article: 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742– 6596/2019/1/012043
Ong, E. T., Luo, X., Yuan, J., & Yingprayoon, J. (2020). The Effectiveness of Professional development programme on the use of STEM–based 5E inquiry learning model for science educators in China. Science Education International, 31(2), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i2.7.
Ortega– Sánchez D, & Jiménez– Eguizábal, A. (2019). Project– based learning through information and communications technology and the curricular inclusion of social problems relevant to the initial training of infant school educators. Sustainability, 11(22), Article: 6370. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226370
Ong., E. T., Govindasamy, D., & Singh, C. K. S. (2021). The 5E inquiry learning model: Its effect on the learning of electricity among Malaysian students. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.33415
Peterson, S. S., McIntyre, L. J., & Forsyth, D. (2016). Supporting young children's oral language and writingdevelopment: Educators' and early childhood educators' goals and practices. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 41(3), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911604100303
Phang, W. L. A., Chong, M. C., Che Mustafa, M., & Mohd Jamil, M. R. (2023). Issues and challenges for the implementation of preschool stream education: What do the preschool educators say? Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 12(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol12.1.5.2023
Pugh, K. J., Kriescher, D.P.J., Tocco, A.J. et al. The seeing science project: Using design–based research to develop a transformative experience intervention. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 338–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956–023–10031–6
Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffoldingstudents in a complex learning environment: What have wegained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1
Rahmawati, R., Suryani, N., Akhyar, M., & Sukarmin. (2020). Technology–integrated Project–based Learning for pre–service educator education: A systematic literature review. Open Engineering, 10(1), 620–629. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng–2020–0069
Ramadhan, M. (2021). Application of the Project based Learning (PJBL) Learning model to increase student activity and learning outcomes. Jurnal Guru Komputer, 2(2), 67–74.
Ramaila, S., & Molwele, A. J. (2022). The role of technology integration in the development of 21st century skills and competencies in life sciences teaching and learning. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(5), 91–17. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v11n5p9
Robinson, R.S. (2014). Purposive sampling. In: Michalos, A.C. (Ed), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2337
Roche, J., Bell, L., Galvão, C., Golumbic, Y. N., Kloetzer, L., Knoben, N., Laakso, M., Lorke, J., Mannion, G., Massetti, L., Mauchline, A., Pata, K., Ruck, A., Taraba, P., & Winter, S. (2020). Citizen Science, Education, and Learning: Challenges and Opportunities. Front. Sociology, 5, Article: 613814. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.613814
Rohman, F., Fauzan, A., & Yohandri. (2019). Integration of technology in Project based Learning with tracker on practicum activities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185, Article: 012036. https://doi.org/1088/1742– 6596/1185/1/012036
Russell, D. R. (2002). Looking beyond the interface activity theory and distributed learning. In M. Lea, & K. Nicoll (Eds.), Distributed learning social and cultural approaches to practice (pp. 64– 82). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Samsudin, M. A., Jamali, S. M.., Md Zain, A. N., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2020). The effect of STEM Project based Learning on self– efficacy among high– school physics students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 94–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3574024
Santyasa, I, W., Rapi, N. K., & Sara, I. W. W. (2020). Project Based Learning and academic procrastination of students in learning physics. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13132a
Silander, P., Riikonen, S., Seitamaa–Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2022). Learning computational thinking in phenomenon–based co–creation projects – Perspectives from Finland. In S.–C. Kong & H. Abelson (Eds.), Computational thinking education in K–12: Artificial intelligence literacy and physical computing (pp. 103–119). MIT. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13375.003.0008.
Sithu, M. S. (2021). The affect of technology supported Project– based Learning for students with diverse abilities [Doctoral Dissertation, Aspen University]
Smith, P. G., Morrow, R. H., & Ross, D. A. (2015). Field trials of health interventions: A toolbox (3rd ed.). OUP Oxford.
Parker, C., Scott, S., & Geddes, A. (2019). Snowball sampling. SAGE Research Methods Foundations.
Soratto. J., Pires, D. E. P., & Friese, S. (2020). Thematic content analysis using Atlas.ti software: potentialities for research in health. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 73(3), Article: 20190250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034–7167–2019–0250
Sormunen, K., Vehmaa, S., Seitamaa–Hakkarainen, P., Lavonen, J., Hakkarainen, K., & Juuti, J. (2023). Learning science through a collaborative invention project in primary school. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 5(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031–023–00074–5
Shpeizer, R. (2019). Towards a successful integration of project– based learning in higher education: Challenges, technologies and methods of implementation. Universal Journal of Educational Research 7(8), 1765–1771. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070815
Stulberg, J. & Love, L. (2009). The middle voice. North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press.
Subramanian, N. K. (2023). Technology in education: a case study on Malaysia. Paris, France: UNESCO–Global Education Monitoring Report Team.
Tanner K. D. (2013). Structure matters: Twenty– one teaching strategies to promote student engagement and cultivate classroom equity. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13– 06– 0115
Thompson, I. (2013). The mediation of learning in the Zone of Proximal Development through a Co– constructed Writing Activity. Research in the Teaching of English, 47(3), 247–276. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24397856
Umugiraneza, O., Bansilal, S. & North, D. (2018). Exploring educators’ use of technology in teaching and learning mathematics in KwaZuluNatal schools. Pythagoras, 39(1), Article: 342. https://doi. org/10.4102/pythagoras. v39i1.342
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956–015–9581–5
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V., Minick, N., & Arns, F. J. (1984). The creation of context in joint problem– solving. In B. L. Rogoff, J. (Ed.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp.151– 171). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Widyasari, W., Rasmitadila, R., Asri, M. H., Rusmiati, A., Abdul, G. A., & Reza, R. (2019). Preliminary study on the development of blended learning (BLM) model: Based on needs analysis and learning independence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6588/1175/1/012012
Willemsen, R. H., de Vink, I. C., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Lazonder, A. W. (2023). The role of creative thinking in children's scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, Article: 101375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101375
Wirajing, M. A. K., & Nchofoung, T.N. (2023). The role of education in modulating the effect of ICT on governance in Africa. Education and Information Technology, 28, 11987–12020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639–023–11631–w
Wilson, K., & Korn, J. (2007). Attention during lectures: Beyond ten minutes. Teaching of Psychology, 34, Article: 8589. https://doi.org/10.1177/009862830703400202
Yeop, M. A., & Gapor, A. L. H. (2012). The effects of the Project– based Learning approach technology on student achievement and acceptance. Jurnal Bitara, 5, 31– 45.
Y?lmaz, Ö. (2023). The role of technology in modern science education. In Baltac?, Ö. (Ed.) Current research in education – VI (pp. 35–60). Erzincan Binali Y?ld?r?m University. https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub383.c1704
Zhang, W. (2022) The Role of Technology–based Education and educator professional development in english as foreign language classes. Front. Psychology, 13, Article: 910315. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910315.
Ghazali, A., Ashari, Z. M., Hardman, J., Kaweng, W., Idris, M. N., Kamaruddin, F. A., & Yusoff, M. A. M. (2024). The Impact of Project-Based Learning-Technology-Based Learning (PBL-TBL) Approach on the Development of Preschool Children: The Perspectives of Educators. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(11), 2148–2173.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
