The aim of this study is to realize the adaptation of “Classroom Discussion Scale” to Turkish accepted after being tested on different samples in terms of their validity and reliability by different researchers and developed by Rahima C. Wade in 1994 and to examine the psychometric features in a sample consisting of social sciences teacher candidates. Totally 494 students from Cumhuriyet University and Karadeniz Technical University participated in the research. Original scale consists of three parts. In order to reveal the construct validity of the first dimensions of the scale in quartet Likert type and second sub dimensions in the triple Likert type, Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used. Cronbach’s Alpha was used for the reliability of the general reliability and sub-dimensions. In the third sub-dimension consisting of the choices of “Agree”, “Disagree”, the percentages of the answers given were tabulated and interpreted. As a result of statistical process, Cronbach’s Alpha value was found as .78. ?n conclusion of the operation performed for the second sub-dimension, Cronbah’s Alpha value was found to be .73. Obtained findings show that Classroom Discussion Scale have adequate level of validity and reliability to be used for measuring the participation of the students in the classroom discussions.
Abeasi, K. & Reigeluth, C. M. (1985). Group Discussions as an effective method of instruction. IID&E Working Paper No. 20. Syracuse University N. Y. School of Education. 19 p.
Altun???k, R., Co?kun, R., Bayraktaro?lu, S., Y?ld?r?m, E. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Ara?t?rma Yöntemleri: SPSS Uygulamal?. Sakarya: Sakarya Kitabevi.
Arsalani, N., Knoshknab, M. F., Ghaffari, M., Josephson, M., Lagerstrom, M. (2011). Adaptation of Questionnaire Measuring Conditions and Health Problems Among Iranian Nursing Personnel. Asian Nursing Research, 5(3), 177-182.
Bademci, V. (2011). Kuder-Richardson 20, Cronbach’?n Alfas?, Hoyt’un Varyans Analizi, Genellenebilirlik Kuram? ve Ölçüm Güvenirli?i Üzerine Bir Çal??ma. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp E?itim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, 173-193.
Büyüköztürk, ?. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitab?. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yay?nc?l?k.
Büyüköztürk, ?., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, O. E., Karadeniz, ?., Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel Ara?t?rma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yay?nc?l?k.
Dashwood, A. (2005). Alternatives to Questioning: Teacher Role in Classroom Discussion. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 7(4), 144-165.
Deniz, Zülfikar K. (2007). Psikolojik Ölçme Arac? Uyarlama. Ankara Üniversitesi E?itim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(1), 1-16.
Dillon, J. T. (1984). Research on Questioning and Discussion. Educational Leadership, 42(3), 50-56.
Geisinger, K. F. (1992). The Metamorphosis of Test Validation. Educational Psychologist, 27(2), 197-222.
Griffiths, M. & Tann, S. (1992). Using reflective practice to link personal and public theories, Journal of Education for Teaching, 18(1), 69-84.
Guadognali, E. and Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of Sample Size to the Stability of Component Patterns. Psychological Bulletin. 103(2), 265-275.
Harkness, J. (2010). Adaptation of Survey Instruments. Cross-Cultural Survey Guidelines.
Harris, D. (1996). Assessing discussion of public issues: A scoring guide. In R. Evans & D. W. Saxe (Eds.), Handbook on teaching social issues. (pp. 289-97). Washington DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
Hertzog, M. A. (2008). Considerations in Determining Sample Size for Pilot Studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 31(2), 180-191.
Hess, D. & Posselt, J. (2002). How High School Students Experience And Learn From The Discussion Of Controversial Public Issues. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 17(4), 283-314.
Hollander, J. A. (2002). Learning to Discuss: Strategies for Improving the Quality of Class Discussion. Teaching Sociology, 30(3), 317-327.
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1988). Critical Thinking Through Structured Controversy. Educational Leadership, 45(8), 58-64.
Kalayc?, ?. (2008). SPSS Uygulamal? Çok De?i?kenli ?statistik Teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yay?n Da??t?m.
Ku?, E. (2009). Nicel-Nitel Ara?t?rma Teknikleri. Sosyal Bilimlerde Ara?t?rma Teknikleri Nicel mi? Nitel mi? Ankara: An? Yay?nc?l?k.
Küçükahmet, L. (2005). Ö?retimde Planlama ve De?erlendirme. Ankara: Nobel Yay?n Da??t?m.
Larson, B. E. & Keiper, T. A. (2002). Classroom Discussion and Threaded Electronic Discussion: Learning In Two Arenas. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. [Online serial] 2(1).
Newmann, F. (1985). The radical perspective on social studies: A synthesis and critique. Theory and Research in Social Education, 13(1), 1-18.
O’Loughlin, M. (1988). Reconceptualizing educational psychology to facilitate teacher empowerment and critical reflection. Paper Presented in Annual Meeting of the Midwest Association of Teachers of Educational Psychology. Bloomington, IN.
Özdamar, K. (2004). Paket Programlar ile ?statistiksel Veri Analizi. Eski?ehir: Kaan Kitabevi.
Peter, J. P. (1981). Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2), 133-145.
Peterson, R. A. (1994). A Meta-Analysis of Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381-391.
Rasmussen, R. V. (1984). Practical Discussion Techniques for Instructors. Alberta Association for Continuing Education Journal, 12(2), 38-47.
Sanders, D. P. & McCutcheon, G. (1986). The Development of Practical Theories of Teaching. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2(1), 50-67.
Schwingle, M. (2000). High School Students’ Attitudes about the Use of Graded Discussions in Social Studies, Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Wisconsin.
Singleton, L.R. & Giese, J.R. (1996). Preparing citizens to participate in democratic discourse: The public issues model. In R.W. Evans & D.W. Saxe (Eds.), Handbook on teaching social issues. (pp. 59-65). Washington DC: National Council of Social Studies.
?encan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve Davran??sal Ölçümlerde Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik. Ankara: Seçkin Yay?nc?l?k.
?im?ek, Ö. F. (2007). Yap?sal E?itlik Modellemesine Giri?: Temel ?lkeler ve Lisrel Uygulamalar?. Ankara: Ekinoks Yay?nc?l?k.
Tezba?aran, A. A. (2008). Likert Tipi Ölçek Haz?rlama K?lavuzu. Mersin: Üçüncü Sürüm e-kitap.
Ur, P. (1990). Discussions that Work. Cambridge University Press. USA.
Wade, R. (1994). Teacher Education Students’ Views on Class Discussion: Implications for Fostering Critical Reflection. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10(2), 231-243.
Copyright: © 2014 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
