The aim of this paper is to analyze the hierarchical network of urban areas of West Azarbaijan for examining the rate of balance in variance and spatial distribution of population of urban areas in the province of West Azarbaijan.
The methodology in use is a pragmatic-developing one. The quantitative models, such as bulk modulus, urban centralization index, anthropy model and gini coefficient index, are used in order to analyze the urban hierarchy of West Azarbaijan. Findings of this study shows that Urban centralization index in all the studied periods was higher that one. Population bulk modulus of all cities of the province in the years of 1956, 1966 and 1976 had augmented but in the years of 1986, 1996 and 2006 has reduced. Anthropy index in all the studied periods was less than one, which shows the unbalance in population in urban areas of the province. Calculation of spatial coefficient LQ shows that small cities of the province are exporter of services and their basic economy is based of services sector. The communicative network of the province, specially the roads, is in a condition that economically targets the capital of the province and like a radius ends to Urumieh.
The final conclusion of this research is that the unbalance in variance and the spatial distribution of population in urban areas of the province is the characteristic of network of urban hierarchy of the province of West Azarbaijan; in a manner that transactions between the cities of the province are also affected by the political-administrative structure of the country as well.
1. Atash, Farhad,(2007), The deterioration of urban environments in developing countries: Mitigating the air pollution crisis in Tehran, Iran, Cities, Vol. 24, No. 6, p. 399–409.
2. Gottdiener , Mark and Budd,Leslie,(2005),Key concepts s in urban studies ,Sage Publication: London,ThousandOaks,NewDelhi.
3. Iran statistic center, house & public census, in years 1956, 1966, 1976, 1986, 1996, 2006.
4. Ley, D and Smith, H, (2000), Relations between deprivation and immigrant groups in large Canadian cities. Urban Studies 37, 37–62.
5. Mercer Human Resource Consulting (2004) 2003 Quality of Living Survey. www.mercerHR.com.
6. Modarres, Ali,(2006), Urbanization and the revolution: An introduction to the special issue, Cities, Vol. 23, No. 6, p. 405–406.
7. Nazarian, asghar, (2000), urban geography of Iran, Payam Noor University,Tehtan.
8. Otiso, K M, (2003), State, voluntary and private sector partnerships for slum upgrading and basic service delivery in Nairobi City, Kenya. Cities 20, 221–229.
9. Ray, D (1998) Development Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
10. Short, John Rennie, (2006), Urban Theory Acritical assessment, Routledge, Newyork.
11. Taylor, P. J, (2004), World city network: A global urban analysis. London: Routledge.
12. Taylor, Peter J,(2005), New political geographies: Global civil society and global governance through world city networks Political Geography 24 (2005) 703e730.
13. The Economist (2003) Close to Bursting: A Survey of Property. May 31 issue, pp. 1–16.
14. The Economist (2004) Office Occupancy Costs. March 27 issue, p. 106.
15. United Nations Center for Human Settlements (UNCHS), 1999. Basic Facts on Urbanization. Nairobi, Kenya: UNCHS Habitat.
16. United Nations Center for Human Settlements (UNCHS), 2001. Cities in a Globalizing World. London, UK: Earthscan.
17. United Nations Center for Human Settlements (UNCHS),(1978),Global Report on Human Settelment,Oxford,UK:Oxford University Prees.
Copyright: © 2014 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
