International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Evaluation of the House Availability for Income Deciles (Case Study: Hormozgan Province)

Open access
House and housing is a long-lasting, multi-dimensional, very expensive commodity full of symbolic values as the icons of dignity and life conditions. So, this study aims to estimate the degree of house availability to different groups in Hormozgan Province, so that the decision-makers, policy-makers and managers may mostly focus on housing problems for the social classes with low income.
This is an applied study that uses a descriptive-analytic method. The geographic area covers the political-official limits of Hormozgan Province in 2006. The statistical data are provided from Statistical Center of Iran.
The findings of this study reveal that the first decile in Hormozgan Province enjoyed a mean building area of 65.8 m² in 2006. This was 72.7 m², 89.5 m², 87.6 m², 86.8 m², 96.7 m², 101.9 m², 107.6 m², 106.7 m² and 119.8 m² for the second to the tenth deciles, respectively. The highest mean for the building area of residential units belongs to the tenth decile. The highest index for house availability belongs to the income groups of the self-employed people, and then the employees of the public, private and cooperative sectors with the availability indices of 3.05, 2.93, 0.08, respectively. The lowest level of private house availability belongs to the employers of the cooperative sector. For the self-employed sector, the lowest availability index belongs to the agricultural division with the level of 0.21.
1-Azizi, M. (2004) Status of House Indicators in The Process of Housing Planning, Honarha-ye Ziba, No. 17.
2-Chafe,Z(2007),Reducing Natural Disaster Risks,In state of the world:our urban future, Newyork: Norton comparisons, Urban Studies, 27, 6.
3-Ghaderi, J. (2002) House Ownership Modeling For Iranina Urban areas, PhD Thesis in Economics, Faculty of Human Sciences, Tarbiyat Modarres University, Tehran.
4-Gottdiener , Mark and Budd,Leslie,(2005),Key concepts s in urban studies ,Sage Publication: London,ThousandOaks,NewDelhi.
5- Habib R.R, Mahfoud , Z, Fawaz MBasma, S.H, Yeretzian J.S,(2008), Housing quality and ill health in a disadvantaged urban community, Public Health 123 (2009) ,PP.174–181.
6-Iran statistic center, house & public census, in years, 1996- 2006.
7-Malpezzi, S, (1990), Urban Housing and Financial Markets: Some International, ), Funding Community Initiatives, London: Earthscan.
8-Meshkini, A., Ziari K., Parhiz, F. & Gholami A. (2011), Estimation of House Inequalities in hormozgan Province Using Gini Quotient, Abadi Quarterly, The Twentieth Year, No. 69, pp. 28-33.
9-Ogu, Vincent I , Ogbuozobe, Joseph E,(2001) ,Housing policy in Nigeria: towards enablement of private housing development, Habitat International 25 (2001),PP. 473-492.
10-United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), 2005. Financing Urban Shelter: Global Report on Human Settlements2005. Earthscan, USA.
11-Ziaria, K.; Parhiz, F.; Mahdnezhad, H.; Ashtari H. (2010), Evaluation of Housing for Low-Income groups and Suggestion of Houseing Plan for Low-Income Groups in Lorestan Province, Human Geography (Goghraphia-ye Ensani) Quarterly.