International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Teacher Quality: Malaysian Teacher Standard

Open access
Teacher quality is a pivotal educational issue that has been examined for years. According to the Malaysia Education Blueprint (2013-2025) report, teacher quality can be categorised into excellent with 55.1 percent, high with 39.9 percent, moderate with 4.8 percent, low with 0.2 percent in comparison to the previous year. This phenomenon is worrying as the excellent teacher quality needs to exceed 70 percent to meet the challenges of 21st century education. This current study is a quantitative study involving 423 secondary school teachers throughout Malaysia. Data collection is carried out using the questionnaire method based on the Malaysian Teacher Standard (SGM). The findings showed that the quality of teachers in Malaysia is excellent. The highest level of teacher quality is the practice of professionalism value while the lowest level of teacher quality is knowledge and understanding.
Alnawasreh, R. I., Nor, M. Y. M., & Suliman, A. (2019). Factors Affecting Malaysian International High School Students’ Performance: The Moderating Effect of Transformational Leadership. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7, 5, 1262–1271.
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire, manual and sampler set (3rd ed.). Redwood City: Mind Garden.
Bass & Bass. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (4th ed.). Free Press: New York.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press: New York.
Berson, Y., & Linton, J. (2005). An examination of the relationships between leadership style, quality, and employee satisfaction in R & D versus administrative environments. R and D Management, 35, 1, 51–60, 2005.
Boberg, J. E., & Bourgeois, S. J. (2016). The effects of integrated transformational leadership on achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 54, Issue 3, 357–374.
Davies, B., & Burnham, J. W. (2010). Reengineering and total quality in school. Pearson Education: United Kingdom.
Dee, T. S., & Wyckoff, J. H. (2015). Incentives, Selection, and Teacher Performance: Evidence from Impact. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34, 2, 267–297.
Ehigie, B. O., & Akpan, R C. (2004). Roles of perceived leadership styles and rewards in the practice of total quality management. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 25, Issue 1, 24–40.
Eyal, O., & Roth G. (2011). Principals’ leadership and teachers’ motivation: Self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 49, Issue 3, 256–275.
Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 41, Issue 3, 228–256, 2006.
Hamzah, M. I., Mat, F., Nordin, N., & Rahman, S. (2011). School as Learning Organization: The Role of Principal’s Transformational Leadership in Promoting Teacher Engagement. World Applied Sciences Journal, 14.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. The Guilford Press: New York.
Hoque, K. E., Alam, G. M., & Abdullah, A. G. K. (2011). Impact of teachers’ professional development on school improvement-an analysis at Bangladesh standpoint. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12, 3, 337–348.
Ishak, R., & Rusman, S. N. F. (2018). Prestasi Kerja Guru dan Hubungannya dengan Faktor Beban Tugas, Persekitaran Kerja dan Personal: Kajian Kes di Sebuah Sekolah di Sabah. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, Bil 5, Isu 1.
Kirunda, H. K. (2004). Performance-Based Rewards and the Performance of Teachers in Private Secondary Schools in Kampala District. Journal of Business Strategies, 7, 5, 132–145.
Kumar, V., & Sharma, R. R. K. (2017). Relating management problem-solving styles of leaders to TQM focus: an empirical study. The TQM Journal, Vol. 29, Issue 2, 218–239.
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). Integrating person and situation perspectives on work satisfaction: A social-cognitive view. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 2, 236–247.
Mau, W. J., Ellsworth, R., & Hawley, D. (2004). Job satisfaction and career persistence of beginning teachers. The International Journal of Educational Management, 22, 1, 48–61.
Menon, M. E. (2014). The relationship between transformational leadership, perceived leader effectiveness and teachers’ job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 52, Issue 4, 509–528.
MOE. (2007). Pekeliling kurang tugas guru 2012, Ministry of Education, 1–22.
MOE. (2008). Malaysian Teachers Standard (SGM), Ministry of Education.
MOE. (2016). Pelan Induk Pembangunan Profesionalisme Keguruan (PIPPK). Ministry of Education Malaysia, 1–53.
Nilsen, Trude & Gustafsson. (2016). Teacher Quality, Instructional Quality and Student Outcomes. Springer International Publishing: New York.
Nor, M. Y. M., Mansor, A. N., & Suliman, A. (2018). The Practice of School Based Management: Special Reference to Malaysian Clusters Schools and UK Autonomous Schools. Journal of Advance Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 10, 2, 1618–1626.
Nordin, A. B., & Othman, I. (2008). Falsafah Pendidikan dan Kurikulum. Quantum Books: Tanjung Malim.
Oakland, J. (2014). Total Quality Management and Operational Excellence. Routledge: London.
Pounder, J. (2014). Quality teaching through transformational classroom leadership. Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 22, Issue 3, 273–285.
Rahim, A., Rahman, A., & Daud, K. (2012). Hubungan antara sistem pengurusan sekolah kualiti (SPSK) dengan kualiti dan produktiviti guru di sekolah rendah daerah Johor Bahru. Masters Dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Rahman, F., Nabi, J., Akhter, Y., Saeed, C., & Ajmal, M. (2011). Relationship Between Training Of Teachers And Effectiveness Teaching. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2, 150–160.
Rao, M. S. (2014). Transformational leadership – an academic case study. Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 46, Issue 3, 150–154.
Shahril, M. (2005). Amalan pengajaran guru yang berkesan: Kajian di beberapa sekolah menengah di Malaysia. Jurnal Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Malaya, 1–14.
Suarman, S. (2015). Teaching Quality and Students Satisfaction: The Intermediatory Role of Relationship between Lecturers and Students of the Higher Learning Institutes. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 2, 626–632.
Talib, F. A., Mansor, A. N., & Surat, S. (2019). Relationship Between Headmaster Transformational Leadership Practice and Teachers’ Job Satisfaction in Kuala Langat. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling, 4, 27, 63–75.
Wahab, J., Fuad, C., Ismail, H., & Majid, S. (2014). Headmasters’ Transformational Leadership and Their Relationship with Teachers’ job Satisfaction and Teachers’ Commitments. International Education Studies, 7, 40–48.
Yahya, Azizah & Yaakob. (2014). Pembentukan dan peningkatan kualiti guru di Malaysia: Siri Monograf Pendidikan. Universiti Utara Malaysia Press: Sintok.
Young, S. C., & Joo, Y. J. (2014). The verification of effective leadership style for TQM: A comparative study between USA-based firms and China-based firms. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 31, Issue 7, 822–840.
Yu, H., Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2002). The effects of transformational leadership on teachers’ commitment to change in Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 40, No. 4, 368–389.
Zhang, Z., Waszink, A. & Wijngaard, J. (2000). An instrument for measuring TQM implementation for Chinese manufacturing companies. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 17, No. 7, 730–755.
In-Text Citation: (Rahman & Ikhlas, 2022)
To Cite this Article: Rahman, M. R. A., & Ikhlas, M. F. (2022). Teacher Quality: Malaysian Teacher Standard. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 12(7), 684– 694.