International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Systematic Literature Review on Infographic Acceptance Factors in Facilitating Teaching and Learning among Students in Higher Education

Open access

Ahmad Khairul Azizi Ahmad, Ashraf Abdul Rahaman, Muhammad Abdullah, Mohd Hisham Johari, Mohd Nasiruddin Abdul Aziz

Pages 1067-1081 Received: 15 Jul, 2022 Revised: 17 Aug, 2022 Published Online: 12 Sep, 2022

http://dx.doi.org/10.46886/IJARBSS/v12-i9/12182
Infographics are visual representations of information in such a way that information can be easily understood at a glance. Infographics are a form of the most powerful stimulator of visual communication in the digital era, and it is gaining popularity among educators. The creation of teaching and learning materials has become critical for students at all levels of education. However there are still insufficient studies that have systematically reviewed the existing literature on infographic acceptance in higher education. Therefore, this article is intended to conduct a systematic literature review on infographic acceptance in facilitating teaching and learning among students in higher education. The current study has combined multiple research designs, and the review was based on the ROSES publication standard (RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses). This study selected papers using two of the most prominent databases: Scopus and Science Direct, and it used Google Scholar as the secondary database. A thematic analysis was implemented and 4 main themes were produced, namely 1) Presentable and efficient; 2) Understandable, 3) Visual literacy, and 4) Facilitating teaching and learning. The study made several significant contributions to the body of knowledge and for practical purposes. The findings have explained the importance of visual communication specifically infographics as a tool for facilitating teaching and learning process and for providing information on specific research areas and content that should be the focus of future studies.
Afify, M. K. (2018). The effect of the difference between infographic designing types (static vs animated) on developing visual learning designing skills and recognition of its elements and principles. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(9).
Alqudah, D., Bidin, A. B., & Hussin, M. A. (2019). The impact of educational infographic on students’ interaction and perception in Jordanian Higher Education: Experimental Study. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 669–688.
Baglama, B., Yucesoy, Y., Uzunboylu, H., & Ozcan, D. (2017). Can infographics facilitate the learning of individuals with mathematical learning difficulties? International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 5(2), 119–127.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Charrois, T. L. (2015). Systematic reviews: what do you need to know to get started?. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 68(2), 144.
Chicca, J., & Chunta, K. (2020). Engaging students with visual stories: Using infographics in nursing education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 15(1), 32–36.
Darcy, R. (2019). Infographics, assessment and digital literacy: innovating learning and teaching through developing ethically responsible digital competencies in public health. Research Repository, 112.
Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2016). Getting graphic about infographics: design lessons learned from popular infographics. Journal of Visual Literacy, 35(1), 42–59.
Fadzil, H. M. (2018). Designing infographics for the Educational Technology Course: Perspectives of PRE-SERVICE science teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 8–18.
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta?analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research synthesis methods, 11(2), 181-217.
Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015). The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PloS one, 10(9), e0138237.
Haddaway, N. R., Macura, B., Whaley, P., & Pullin, A. S. (2018). ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environmental Evidence, 7(1), 1-8.
Halevi, G., Moed, H., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2017). Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the literature. Journal of informetrics, 11(3), 823-834.
Heimbürger, A., & Isomöttönen, V. (2019, October). Infographics as a reflective assignment method in requirements engineering e-course?. In 2019 IEEE frontiers in education conference (FIE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Hsiao, P. Y., Laquatra, I., Johnson, R. M., & Smolic, C. E. (2018). Using Infographics to Teach the Evidence Analysis Process to Senior Undergraduate Students. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 119(1), 26-30.
Jaleniauskiene, E., & Kasperiuniene, J. (2022). Infographics in higher education: A scoping review. E-Learning and Digital Media, 20427530221107774.
Jaleniauskiene, E., & Kasperiuniene, J. (2022). Visual Literacy Development Through Infographics. In European Conference on Information Literacy (pp. 189-200). Springer, Cham.
Kitchenham, B. A. (2012, September). Systematic review in software engineering: where we are and where we should be going. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on evidential assessment of software technologies (pp. 1-2).
Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O. P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a systematic literature review. Information and software technology, 51(1), 7-15.
Martin, L. J., Turnquist, A., Groot, B., Huang, S. Y., Kok, E., Thoma, B., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2019). Exploring the role of infographics for summarizing medical literature. Health Professions Education, 5(1), 48-57.
Martin-Martin, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of informetrics, 12(4), 1160-1177.
Martix, S., & Hodson, J. (2014). Teaching with infographics: practising new digital competencies and visual literacies.
Moher, D. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The Prisma statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264.
Naparin, H., & Saad, A. B. (2017). Infographics in education: Review on infographics design. The International Journal of Multimedia & Its Applications (IJMA), 9(4), 5.
Noh, M. A. M., Shamsudin, W. N. K., Nudin, A. L. A., Jing, H. F., Daud, S. M., Abdullah, N. N. N., & Harun, M. F. (2015). The use of infographics as a tool for facilitating learning. In International colloquium of art and design education research (i-CADER 2014) (pp. 559-567). Springer, Singapore.
Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 43.
Ozdaml?, F., Kocakoyun, S., Sahin, T., & Akdag, S. (2016). Statistical reasoning of impact of infographics on education. Procedia Computer Science, 102, 370-377.
Parveen, A., & Husain, N. (2021). Infographis as a promising tool for teaching and learning.
Patino, C. M., & Ferreira, J. C. (2018). Inclusion and exclusion criteria in research studies: definitions and why they matter. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, 44, 84-84.
Rahim, N. N., Khidzir, N. Z., Yusof, A. M., & Saidin, A. Z. (2016). An assessment of quality on animated Infographics in an islamic context. In Proceedings 2016 IEEE international conference on teaching and learning in education (ICTLE 2016).
Savini, C. A., Gasull, V. L., & Gimeno, P. B. (2019, March). INFOGRAPHICS. A way to increase competences. In 2019 IEEE World Conference on Engineering Education (EDUNINE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Seehra, J., Pandis, N., Koletsi, D., & Fleming, P. S. (2016). Use of quality assessment tools in systematic reviews was varied and inconsistent. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 69, 179-184.
Shaffril, H. A. M., Ahmad, N., Samsuddin, S. F., Samah, A. A., & Hamdan, M. E. (2020). Systematic literature review on adaptation towards climate change impacts among indigenous people in the Asia Pacific regions. Journal of cleaner production, 258, 120595.
Traboco, L., Pandian, H., Nikiphorou, E., & Gupta, L. (2022). Designing Infographics: Visual Representations for Enhancing Education, Communication, and Scientific Research. Journal of Korean medical science, 37(27).
Walker, J. J. (2007). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: a Practical Guide?by Petticrew, M. and Roberts, H.
Wanden-Berghe, C., & Sanz-Valero, J. (2012). Systematic reviews in nutrition: standardized methodology. British journal of nutrition, 107(S2), S3-S7.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of planning education and research, 39(1), 93-112.
In-Text Citation: (Ahmad et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Ahmad, A. K. A., Rahaman, A. A., Abdullah, M., Johari, M. H., & Aziz, M. N. A. (2022). Systematic Literature Review on Infographic Acceptance Factors in Facilitating Teaching and Learning among Students in Higher Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(9), 1067– 1081.