The purpose of this study is to find the important attributes of organizations that effect employee choice, using conjoint analysis as an analytical tool. According to the purpose firstly 11 organizational attributes were determined based on relevant literature then the following five attributes of organizations were identified with a pilot study: pay level, social insurance, organizational reputation, working hours and transportation. Using subjects from a cement factory in Ordu, 105 respondents were asked to rank 16 cards for five organizational attributes with different combinations of these five attributes. The results indicate that pay level has the greatest influence on the respondents’ choice, followed by social insurance, organizational reputation, working hours and transportation. Additionally it is revealed that forth card which is one of the created cards based on analysis results represented most desirable situation for employees. Employees are willing to work in businesses which have good reputation, provide social insurance and have ability to pay high wages to its employees. They also want to arrive to business easily and work in normal working hours.
Ataay, ?. D., & Acar, A. C. (2013). Ücret Yönetimi (Compensation Management). Ö. Sadullah, C. Uyargil, A. C. Acar, A. O. Özçelik, G. Dündar, Z. A. ?smail Durak Ataay, et al. inside, ?nsan kaynaklar? yönetimi (Human Resource Management, 6th Edition) (s. 351-451). ?stanbul: Beta Publishing.
Bingöl, D. (2013).?nsan kaynaklar? yönetimi (Human Resource Management,8th Edition). ?stanbul: Beta Publishing.
Blau, P. M. (1972). Interdependence and hierarchy in organizations. Social Science Research, 1(1):1-24.
Brown, K., Bradley, L., Lingard, H., Townsend, K., & Ling, S. (2010). Working time arrangements and recreation: making time for weekends when working long hours. Australian Bulletin of Labour, 36(2):194-213.
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Pay preferences and job search decisions: A Person-organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47(2):317–348.
Child, J. (1973). Predicting and understanding organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(2):168-185.
Dalton, D. R., Todor, W. D., Spendolini, M. J., Fielding, G. J., & Porter, L. W. (1980). Organization structure and performance: A Critical review. The Academy of Management Review , 5(1):49-64.
Deloitte. (2010).Trust in the workplace: 2010 Ethics & Workplace Survey. June 02, 2014 http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/us_2010_Ethics_and_Workplace_Survey_report_071910.pdf.
Dennis, W. J. (2000). Wages, health insurance and pension plans: The Relationship between employee compensation and small business owner income. Small Business Economics, 15(4): 247–263.
Forster, N., Ebrahim, A. A., & Ibrahim, N. A. (2013). An exploratory study of work-life balance and work-family conflicts in the United Arab Emirates. Skyline Business Journal, 9(1):34-42.
Gooding, R. Z., & Wagner, J. A. (1985). A Meta-analytic review of the relationship between size and performance: The productivity and efficiency of organizations and their subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(4):462-481.
Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2):103-123.
Harold, C. M., & Ployhart, R. E. (2008). What do applicants want? Examining changes in attribute judgements over time. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81:191–218.
Huffaker, B. (2013). Creating a culture of career development in corporations. Career Planning & Adult Development Journal, 29(2):152-155.
Kayaba??, A. (2010). Rekabet gücü perspektifinde lojistik faaliyetlerde performans geli?tirme (Logistics performance improvement in the perspective of competitiveness). ?stanbul: ?TO Publishing.
Kimberly, J. A. (1976). Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: A Review, critique, and proposal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(4):571-597.
Kuhfeld, W. F. (2010, October 1).Marketing research methods in SAS. June 27, 2014, SAS Institute: http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2010.pdf.
Lallemand, T., Plasman, R., & Rycx, F. (2005). Why do large ?rms pay higher wages? Evidence from matched worker-?rm data. International Journal of Manpower, 26(7/8):705-723.
Luce, R. D., & Tukey, J. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1,1-27.
Men, L. R., & Stacks, D. W. (2013). The impact of leadership style and employee empowerment on perceived organizational reputation. Journal of Communication Management, 17(2):171-192.
Onaran, O. (1981).Çal??ma ya?am?nda güdülenme kuramlar? (Theories of motivation at work). Ankara: Sevinç Publishing.
Örücü, E., Yumu?ak, S., & Özçelik, C. (2004). ??gören motivasyonunu etkileyen faktörlerin incelenmesi: Kalite yönetimi uygulayan ve uygulamayan iki ?irketin kar?ila?tirilmasi (Examinig factors affecting employee motivation: Comparison between two companies). Band?rma ??BF Yönetim ve Ekonomi Ara?tirmalari Dergisi, 1(2):135-168.
Poortinga, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Wiersma, G. (2003). Household preferences for energy-saving measures: A conjoint analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24,49–64.
Pruzan, P. (2001). Corporate reputation: Image and identity. Corporate Reputation Review, 4(1):50–64.
Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. (2005). Being good or being known: An Empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management, 48(6):1033-1049.
TÜ?K. (2014, June 16).Hanehalk? i?gücü istatistikleri (Household labor force statistics), March 2014. July 07, 2014 Türkiye ?statistik Kurumu: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=16008.
Weiner, N., & Mahoney, T. A. (1981). A Model of corporate performance as a function of environmental, organizational, and leadership influences. The Academy of Management Journal, 24(3):453-470.
Yüksel, S., Türk, Y., & Öztürk, ?. (2011).Sürdürülebilir büyüme için stratejik dönü?üm: Ekonomi raporu 2011. (Strategic Transformat?on For Sustainable Growth: Research Paper,2011) ?stanbul: MUS?AD Research Papers
Copyright: © 2014 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
