This study aims to test whether self-efficacy and perceived organizational support influence work engagement among Binmas members of the DI Yogyakarta police department. The study involved 113 participants, all of whom are active members of the Binmas police department in DI Yogyakarta, have a minimum educational qualification of high school, and have worked for at least one year. The data collection tools used were the work engagement scale, the self-efficacy scale, and the perceived organizational support scale. The data analysis method employed simple and multiple linear regression statistical techniques. The results show that the self-efficacy regression coefficient on work engagement is 0.288 (p<0.01); the perceived organizational support regression coefficient on work engagement is 0.439 (p<0.01), and the multiple regression coefficient of self-efficacy and perceived organizational support on work engagement is 0.537 (p<0.01). From the analysis, it can be concluded that the contribution of self-efficacy and perceived organizational support, and the combined contribution of self-efficacy and perceived organizational support to work engagement are 7.5%, 18.5%, and 27.5% respectively. This indicates that the first, second, and third hypotheses are accepted.
Andamari, S. R. (2019). Analisis Faktor Kepemimpinan Otentik Dan Persepsi Dukungan Organisasi Pada Work Engagement Staf Organisasi Perhotelan Dengan Efikasi Diri Sebagai Mediatornya. Jurnal Psikologi Integratif, 7(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpsi.v7i2.1775
Armstrong, M. (2014). Handbook Of Human Resource Management Practice (Thirteenth). ritish Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. www.koganpage.com
Aulia, A., Rahmawati, A., & Sari, S. N. (2022). Work engagement of high-risk occupation employees?: The role of self- efficacy and perceived organizational support. 19(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v19i2.44
Azis, S., Sutrasno, D., & Setiawan, W. (2022). Tingkat Kepercayaan Masyarakat terhadap Kinerja Polri Tahun 2021. Jurnal Litbang Polri, April, 23–34.
Bakker, A. B. (2011). An Evidence-Based Model of Work Engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Scienc, 20(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411414534
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007a). The Job Demands-Resources model?: state of the art. 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007b). The Job Demands-Resources model?: state of the art. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2010). The power of positive psychology: Psychological capital and work engagement. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research (pp. 54–68).
Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work and Stress, 22(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370802393649
Bakker, A. B., & van Wingerden, J. (2021). Do personal resources and strengths use increase work engagement? The effects of a training intervention. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 26(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000266
Bandura, A. (1997). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Chen, I. S. (2022). The Moderating Role of Personal Resources in the Relationship Between Job Demands and Work Engagement. Psihologija, 55(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI200707007C
Day, D. V., Fleenor, J. W., Atwater, L. E., Sturm, R. E., & McKee, R. A. (2014). Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.004
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived Organizational Support. 71(3), 500–507.
Iqbal, T., Khan, K., & Iqbal, N. (2012). Job stress & employee engagement. European Journal of Social Sciences, 28(1), 109–118.
Kalidass, A., & Bahron, A. (2015). The Relationship between Perceived Supervisor Support , Perceived Organizational Support , Organizational Commitment and Employee Turnover Intention. 6(5), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v6n5p82
Khairunnisa, S. F. (2023). Pengaruh Persepsi Kepemimpinan , Innovative Work Behaviour Terhadap Workforce Agility pada Perusahaan. 16(3), 210–215. https://doi.org/10.35134/jpsy165.v16i3.274
Kristiana, I. F., Purwono, U., & Fajrianthi, F. (2018). Analisis Rasch Dalam Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-9 (Uwes-9) Versi Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi, 17(2), 204. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.17.2.204-217
Mardiana, K. A., & Wijowo, S. (2022). Hubungan Self-efficacy dengan Work Engagement pada Karyawan Pusat Pengembangan Anak ( YCI ) Selama Masa. 4(3), 778–784.
Marpaung, R. A., Lubis, S. A., & Lubis, M. R. (2022). Pengaruh Quality of Work Life dan Profesionalisme Terhadap Keterlibatan Kerja Personil Satlantas Di Kepolisian Resort Kota Besar Medan The Influence of Quality of Work Life and Professionalism On The Engagement of Satlantas Personnel in The Police Medan B. 4(3), 1574–1583. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i3.911
Melinda, S., & Salendu, A. (2021). Persepsi Dukungan Organisasi dan Work Engagement pada Aparatur Sipil Negara di Instansi PQR. Jurnal Diversita, 7(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31289/diversita.v7i2.4809
Novrianto, R., Marettih, A. K. E., & Wahyudi, H. (2019). Validitas Konstruk Instrumen General Self Efficacy Scale Versi Indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi, 15(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24014/jp.v15i1.6943
Pratama, M. M., & Puspitadewi, N. W. S. (2019). Hubungan Antara Efikasi Diri Dengan Work Engagement Pada Karyawan Pt X. Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 06(02).
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived Organizational Support?: A Review of the Literature. 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.698
Rotich, R. K., Cheruiyot, T. K., & Korir, M. K. (2016). Effects of demographics on the relationship between optimism and work engagement among employees of state agencies in kenya. Journal of Resources Development and Management, 18(2014), 32–42.
Sahrah, A. (2017). Perceived Organizational Support Dan Organizational Citizenship Behavior Pada Perawat Rumah Sakit. Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 19(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.26486/psikologi.v19i1.598
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
Sartika, D., Pancaningrum, R. K., & Jumadi, J. (2022). Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Dengan Mekanisme Restorative Justice. Prosiding Semnaskom, 4(1).
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Utrecht work engagement scale Preliminary Manual Version 1.1. Occupational Health Psychology Unit Utrecht University, December, 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/t01350-000
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Bakker, A. B., & Alez-rom, V. G. (2002). The Measurement Of Engagement And Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. 71–92.
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1988). Self-efficacy and work-related performance A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240–261.
Waileruny, H. T. (2014). Perceived Organizational Support, Job Satistaction Dan Organizational Citizenship Behavior Pada PT. Bank Maluku Cabang Utama Kota Ambon. Agora, 2(2), 1–9. https://www.neliti.com/publications/35954/
Dahliana, R. I., & Sahrah, A. (2024). The Influence of Self-Efficacy and Perceived Organizational Support on Work Engagement in Members of the Regional Community Guidance in Yogyakarta Special Region. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(9), 2162–2171.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
