An assessment was made of the effect of family size on store brand perception. It was hypothesized that larger households because of resources constraints would have a higher perception of store brands. A survey of 43 households was conducted in Harare, Bulawayo and Bindura and their perception of store brands was captured along three dimensions which were perceived quality, value and risk. The results from the regression analysis illustrated that the effect of household size was significant for perceived value (p=0.003) and perceived risk (p<0.0001). Regarding perceived quality there was no significant (p>0.05) effect of family size. Specifically there was a strong negative correlation between family size and perceived risk for store brands and a strong positive correlation between family size and perceived value. The authors concluded that when family size is bigger there is a higher chance that the main shoppers will tryout lower priced brands that are on the market and this is because of resource constraints. This pattern of consumer behavior will lead to greater familiarity of store brands among larger households and consequently lower perceived risk and a higher value perception. Retailers can drive the growth of private label brands among price conscious consumers through the development of advertisements which communicate the fact that store brands offer economic advantage to large households without compromise of quality.
1. Abubakar H. L. (2011). The Relevance of Marketing Segmentation on the Level of Sales of a Product or Service. Journal of Entrepreneurship Research, 1(1):36-45
2. Ailawadi K, Neslin SA, Gedenk K. (2001). Pursing the value-conscious consumer: store brands versus national brand promotions. Journal of Marketing 65:71–89
3. Ailawadi,Kusum L., Koen Pauwels and Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp (2008), “Private Label Use and Store Loyalty,” Journal of Marketing , 72 (3), 19-30
4. Barta, R, and Sinha I. (1999). The effect of consumer price consciousness on private label purchase. International journal of research in Marketing 16 ():237-251.
5. Beneke J., (2010). Consumer perception of private label brands within the retail grocery sector of South Africa. African Journal of Business Management 4(2):203-220
6. Burton, S., Lichtenstein D.R., Netemeyer R .G. and Garretson A.J. (1998). A scale for measuring attitude toward private label products and an examination of psychological and behavioral correlates. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 26(4):293-306.
7. Chimhundu R., (2011). Private label marketing performance: an analysis of historical trends using theories of cumulative change and punctuated equilibrium. International Journal of Business and Management 6(8):58-65
8. DelVecchio D., (2001). Consumer perceptions of private label quality: the role of product category characteristics and consumer use of heuristics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 8 (2001):239-249
9. Diallo M.F., Chandon J.L., Cliquet G. and Philippe J. (2013). Factors influencing consumer behaviour towards store brands: Evidence from the French market. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 41 (6): 422-441.
10. Frank, R.E. and Boyd H.W. (1965) Are Private-Brand Prone Grocery Customers Really Different? Journal of Marketing Research 2(4): 27-35.
11. Fernie J, Fernie S, Moore C., (2003). Principles of Retailing, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford.
12. Gonzalez-Benito O. and Martos-Partal M., (2012). Role of Retailer Positioning and Product Category on the Relationship between Store Brand Consumption and Store Loyalty. Journal of Retailing 88 (2): 236-249
13. Keller K. L., (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing 57(1): 1-22.
14. Morgenson G., (1991). The trend is not their friend. Forbes September 16: 114-119.
15. Narasimhen C., & Wilcox R.T., (1998). “Private Labels and the Channel Relationship: A Cross-Category Analysis”. Journal of Business, 71(4): 573-600
16. Nyengerai S., Jaravaza D., Mukucha P., Chirimubwe R and Manjoro E., (2013). Determinants of Perception towards Private Label Brands in Zimbabwe: The Role of Familiarity, Store Image, Demographic Factors and Consumer Characteristics. Journal of Business and Management Studies 3 (5): 224-230
17. Richardson P.S., Jain A.K. and Dick A., (1996). Household store brand proneness: a framework. Journal of Retailing 72 (2): 159-185
18. Semeijn J, van Riel A.C.R and Ambrosini A.B., (2004). Consumer evaluations of store brands: effects of store image and product attributes. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 11:247-258
19. Symphony IRI Group. (2012). Private Label in Europe: Is there a limit to growth? From: www.symphonyiri.eu (accessed 5 November 2013)
20. Tifferet S., Herstein R., (2010) "The effect of individualism on private brand perception: a cross-cultural investigation", Journal of Consumer Marketing 27 (4) :313-323
21. Vahie A. and Paswan A., (2006). Private label brand image: its relationship with store image and national brand. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 34 (1):67-84
22. Van Riel, A.C.R., Lemmink J. and Ouwersloot, H., (2001). Consumer` evaluations of brand extensions: differences between goods and services. Journal of Service Research 3 (3): 220–231.
23. Walker J (2006). Bye-Bye Big Brands, J. Mark. 28 (17): 23.
Copyright: © 2014 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
