In the course of my doctoral journey, I (first author) confront and is not absolvable to me either, the entrenched colonial legacies that pervade higher education, particularly at Universiti Malaya, mirroring broader Western-centric research paradigms, hence, I am asking myself, am I doing ‘righting wrongs’ in my PhD. This study is then, takes a border scope in Asian context that aspires to undertake a critical examination of these colonial influences, interrogate the deeply rooted biases within academic discourse, and propose innovative pathways for a decolonized research framework that amplifies marginalized voices while integrating perspectives from the Global South. Aim: The objective is to scrutinize the persistence of colonial attitudes embedded in academic research and to advocate for research practices that are ethical, community-engaged, and inclusive of Indigenous knowledge systems. Method: Adopting a decolonial approach, this research encompasses a meticulous analysis of institutional practices 100 theses, a comprehensive review of pertinent literature on colonialism in higher education, and qualitative interviews with scholars and community stakeholders. This methodology elucidates how Western paradigms and the absence of community consent perpetuate the marginalization of Indigenous voices. Findings: The study reveals a persistent presence of colonial attitudes within the university’s research methodologies, highlighting a failure to integrate community consent and to honor Indigenous knowledge systems. These findings underscore the urgent necessity for a paradigm shift towards more inclusive and ethically grounded research methodologies. Impact: By addressing these critical issues, this personal igniting point is not more uncentered issue, rather, the research endeavors to contribute to a more equitable and inclusive academic environment. It seeks to challenge prevailing power dynamics and promote the integration of diverse epistemologies, ultimately advancing social justice within research practices. Policy Implications: This study advocates for comprehensive policy reforms within higher education institutions to adopt decolonized research frameworks and to establish rigorous guidelines for ethical, community-engaged research. It emphasizes the imperative of implementing consent processes and incorporating Indigenous perspectives within academic research, thereby fostering a more equitable and socially just research landscape.
Alatas, S. F. (2000). Intellectual imperialism: Definition, traits, and problems. Sociological Bulletin, 49(3), 405-424.
Alatas, S. F. (2006). Alternative discourses in Asian social science: Responses to Eurocentrism. SAGE Publications.
Alatas, S. H. (1972). The captive mind and the colonial intellectual. In Intellectuals in developing societies: The political economy of the new elite. London: Macmillan.
Andreotti, V. (2011). (Towards) decoloniality and diversity in global citizenship education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(3-4), 381-397.
Barden, P. (2022). Decoded: the science behind why we buy.
Battiste, M. (2013). Decolonizing education: Nourishing the learning spirit. UBC Press.
Baumann, B., & Rehbein, B. (2024). Decolonizing Understanding: Language and Translation in the Social Sciences. In Global Handbook of Inequality (pp. 1-20). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Bloomberg, L. D. (2022). Completing your qualitative dissertation: A road map from beginning to end.
Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. SAGE Publications.
Chowdhury, J. S., Vadevelu, K., Hatta, Z. A., Ashraf, M., & Bhaumik, A. (Eds.). (2024b). Reviving and Re-writing Ethics in Social Research for Commoning the Community. IGI Global.
Chowdhury, J. S., Vadevelu, K., Zakaria, A. F. M., Al-Mamun, A., & Ahmed, S. (Eds.). (2024a). History and Educational Philosophy for Social Justice and Human Rights. IGI Global.
Chowdhury, J. S., Wahab, H. A., Saad, R. M., Reza, H., & Ahmad, M. M. (Eds.). (2022). Reciprocity and its practice in social research. IGI Global.
Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Polity.
Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Polity.
Das, T. K., Mehta, B., Nikku, B. R., Omer, S., & Granich, S. (2023). Decolonizing South Asian social work: an analysis. Social Work Education, 42(5), 601-619.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2008). The landscape of qualitative research (Vol. 1). Sage.
Karim, M. R., & Azman, N. (2013). Internationalization of higher education: A comparative study of Malaysia and Pakistan. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 270-283.
Kelemen, M., & Rumens, N. (2008). An introduction to critical management research. Sage.
Kovach, M. (2010). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. University of Toronto Press.
Kumar, P., Mukharji, P. B., & Prasad, A. (2018). Decolonizing science in Asia. Verge: Studies in Global Asias, 4(1), 24-43.
Kuokkanen, R. (2000). Towards an "Indigenous paradigm" from a Sami perspective. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 20(2), 411-436.
Lee, M. N. (2004). Global trends, national policies and institutional responses: Restructuring higher education in Malaysia. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 3(1), 31-46.
Matteson, S. M., & DeLozier, R. W. (2022). Insights into undertaking a three-article dissertation. In Methodological innovations in research and academic writing (pp. 240-259). IGI Global. [HTML]
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2013). Coloniality of power in postcolonial Africa: Myths of decolonization. CODESRIA.
Peters, M. A., & Roberts, P. (2018). The role of the academic in society: The politics of higher education. New York: Routledge.
Peters, M. A., & Roberts, P. (2018). The role of the academic in society: The politics of higher education. Routledge.
Phillips, E. & Johnson, C. (2022). How to Get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors 7e. [HTML]
Porsanger, J. (2004). An essay about indigenous methodology. Nordlit, 8(1), 105-120.
Roy, P., Chowdhury, J. S., Abd Wahab, H., & Saad, R. (2022). Social Justice Through BPATC in Bangladesh Under the Shadow of Colonialism: Prospects and Challenges. Social Justice Research Methods for Doctoral Research, 303-319.
Sharmini, S., & Spronken-Smith, R. (2020). The PhD–is it out of alignment?. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(4), 821-833.
Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. Sage.
Siraz Chowdhury, J., Wahab, H. A., Mohd Saad, M. R., Mathbor, G. M., & Hamidi, M. (2023). Concluding Reflection: Seeing Self Through Other…. In Ubuntu Philosophy for the New Normalcy (pp. 161-196). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271-313). Macmillan.
Spivak, G. C. (2004). Righting wrongs. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(2), 523-581.
Venkatesh, V. (2021). Road to success: A guide for doctoral students and junior faculty members in the behavioral and social sciences. vt.edu
Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing.
(Chowdhury & Hatta, 2024)
Chowdhury, J. S., & Hatta, Z. (2024). PHD as Pizza Hut Delivering Model: ‘Righting Wrongs!’ How Long. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(8), 2691–2702.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
